<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7828 by Klingsor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:59:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174737</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Klingsor, and flashling.   I found this about average in difficulty - some very pleasing surfaces in clues with subtle misdirection.   My favourites were AT ONCE and TINTORETTO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Klingsor, and flashling.   I found this about average in difficulty &#8211; some very pleasing surfaces in clues with subtle misdirection.   My favourites were AT ONCE and TINTORETTO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174734</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11ac and 28ac look OK to me, so I guess the the online version must have been corrected by the time I attempted this.

I was stuck on 24dn, thanks flashling for enlightening me.  I think it is a fair clue (and a good one!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11ac and 28ac look OK to me, so I guess the the online version must have been corrected by the time I attempted this.</p>
<p>I was stuck on 24dn, thanks flashling for enlightening me.  I think it is a fair clue (and a good one!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174732</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I managed to finish this over lunch time apart from 28 and 24.  After a few minutes studying tonight, I finally thought of steely, although the word order didn&#039;t seem to make sense.  I&#039;m glad to find out that (for once) it wasn&#039;t entirely might fault that I couldn&#039;t get the answer easily.  I completely failed to notice the fed up in 24 and assumed that def referred to the slang word, which for some reason I thought meant &quot;bad&quot; when it actually means the opposite.  

A nice puzzle but a shame about the two mistakes which made the ride a bit less smooth than it should have been.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I managed to finish this over lunch time apart from 28 and 24.  After a few minutes studying tonight, I finally thought of steely, although the word order didn&#8217;t seem to make sense.  I&#8217;m glad to find out that (for once) it wasn&#8217;t entirely might fault that I couldn&#8217;t get the answer easily.  I completely failed to notice the fed up in 24 and assumed that def referred to the slang word, which for some reason I thought meant &#8220;bad&#8221; when it actually means the opposite.  </p>
<p>A nice puzzle but a shame about the two mistakes which made the ride a bit less smooth than it should have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian_J</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174731</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian_J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much flashling and other contributors. I&#039;m new to Fifteensquared and love the fact that I can cheat a little if I get completely stuck. 11a Always looked like letting but I held out from entering it because I couldn&#039;t work out why!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much flashling and other contributors. I&#8217;m new to Fifteensquared and love the fact that I can cheat a little if I get completely stuck. 11a Always looked like letting but I held out from entering it because I couldn&#8217;t work out why!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174722</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got there in the end despite clueing errors; as well I was doing the online version so I could check 11a and 28a.  Mildly surprised only to find one musical reference (NONO) from Klingsor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got there in the end despite clueing errors; as well I was doing the online version so I could check 11a and 28a.  Mildly surprised only to find one musical reference (NONO) from Klingsor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174712</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clarification to 11: I meant to say that I was pleased that my construction at 11ac was wrong, but thought the general point was worth airing.

Also, apologies for mistyping &quot;Klingsor&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarification to 11: I meant to say that I was pleased that my construction at 11ac was wrong, but thought the general point was worth airing.</p>
<p>Also, apologies for mistyping &#8220;Klingsor&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174711</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Klingsor for a puzzle that had a lot of good clues and flashling for the blog. For me 23dn was one of those clues that I stared at for some minutes (with E-O-- already filled in) and then the solution hit me - very satisfying.

Thanks for the clarification on 28ac, for which I have nothing to add.

11ac: It was clear that LETTING was the answer. I managed to parse it as &quot;about&quot; = &quot;a bout&quot; = LEG, thinking in terms of multi-stage sporting contests. This has two problems: firstly the synonym is at best approximate, and second there is an unsignalled requirement to split a clue word. I have been reading Klingor&#039;s (or Alberich&#039;s) website following general discussion, and he makes a case for the acceptability of splitting a clue word, when the pronunciation is not changed. I still do not like this device, but at least I can see some sense behind it with that limitation.

24dn: I have to disagree with Thomas@5. I think asking us to convert &quot;Bored&quot; to &quot;fed up&quot; and then take the &quot;up&quot; as a reversal indicator, with only a question mark to hint that something strange is going on, is just asking too much for a weekday newspaper puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Klingsor for a puzzle that had a lot of good clues and flashling for the blog. For me 23dn was one of those clues that I stared at for some minutes (with E-O&#8211; already filled in) and then the solution hit me &#8211; very satisfying.</p>
<p>Thanks for the clarification on 28ac, for which I have nothing to add.</p>
<p>11ac: It was clear that LETTING was the answer. I managed to parse it as &#8220;about&#8221; = &#8220;a bout&#8221; = LEG, thinking in terms of multi-stage sporting contests. This has two problems: firstly the synonym is at best approximate, and second there is an unsignalled requirement to split a clue word. I have been reading Klingor&#8217;s (or Alberich&#8217;s) website following general discussion, and he makes a case for the acceptability of splitting a clue word, when the pronunciation is not changed. I still do not like this device, but at least I can see some sense behind it with that limitation.</p>
<p>24dn: I have to disagree with Thomas@5. I think asking us to convert &#8220;Bored&#8221; to &#8220;fed up&#8221; and then take the &#8220;up&#8221; as a reversal indicator, with only a question mark to hint that something strange is going on, is just asking too much for a weekday newspaper puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eimi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174707</link>
		<dc:creator>eimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m the somebody that failed to notice the rewritten clue didn&#039;t work, so apologies for that. I&#039;m attempting to correct the online version at the moment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the somebody that failed to notice the rewritten clue didn&#8217;t work, so apologies for that. I&#8217;m attempting to correct the online version at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klingsor</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174701</link>
		<dc:creator>Klingsor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I owe apologies here for sloppy work. During the editing process I corrected 28 to

Arch embodying support that’s firm (6)

but the original appears in the online version - I&#039;m glad that at least the paper carries the correct one.

The original clue to 11a was 

Becoming a landlord on acquiring tenant’s first money? (7) 

It was an &amp;lit - the def meant to imply that you don&#039;t really start letting until you&#039;ve received some wonga, and the wordplay exactly as Thomas99 parsed it. I was asked to look again at this and in the process of changing it I got it into what passes for my brain that I was clueing &quot;on&quot; as the container rather than &quot;leg&quot; (again Thomas99 is right here, though the leg/on/about connection wasn&#039;t intentional). I guess that after resubmitting this clue nobody else noticed this either. Shame.

Apologies again - I hope you all enjoyed the bits I managed to get right!

K]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owe apologies here for sloppy work. During the editing process I corrected 28 to</p>
<p>Arch embodying support that’s firm (6)</p>
<p>but the original appears in the online version &#8211; I&#8217;m glad that at least the paper carries the correct one.</p>
<p>The original clue to 11a was </p>
<p>Becoming a landlord on acquiring tenant’s first money? (7) </p>
<p>It was an &amp;lit &#8211; the def meant to imply that you don&#8217;t really start letting until you&#8217;ve received some wonga, and the wordplay exactly as Thomas99 parsed it. I was asked to look again at this and in the process of changing it I got it into what passes for my brain that I was clueing &#8220;on&#8221; as the container rather than &#8220;leg&#8221; (again Thomas99 is right here, though the leg/on/about connection wasn&#8217;t intentional). I guess that after resubmitting this clue nobody else noticed this either. Shame.</p>
<p>Apologies again &#8211; I hope you all enjoyed the bits I managed to get right!</p>
<p>K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/17/independent-7828-by-klingsor/#comment-174700</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36864#comment-174700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually I&#039;m now leaning towards Eileen&#039;s explanation of 11a - adding &quot;set&quot; would make it a very good clue. Another misprint?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I&#8217;m now leaning towards Eileen&#8217;s explanation of 11a &#8211; adding &#8220;set&#8221; would make it a very good clue. Another misprint?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
