Comments on: Enigmatic Variations No.992 – Udergroud by Loda http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/19/enigmatic-variations-no-992-udergroud-by-loda/ Never knowingly undersolved. Wed, 22 May 2013 15:42:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Cap'n P'ng'n http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/19/enigmatic-variations-no-992-udergroud-by-loda/#comment-175812 Cap'n P'ng'n Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:41:05 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36816#comment-175812 I think the gremlins might have changed “conducted” to “composed” in the clue for 3d.
Thanks to Deep Threat – I was with Mr Sting on the patronymic.

Cap’n P’ng’n

]]> By: Mister Sting http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/19/enigmatic-variations-no-992-udergroud-by-loda/#comment-175253 Mister Sting Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:38:12 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36816#comment-175253 What *was* I thinking? Obviously, that is what is intended. My apologies all round.

]]> By: Deep Threat http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/19/enigmatic-variations-no-992-udergroud-by-loda/#comment-175216 Deep Threat Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:38:44 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36816#comment-175216 I had ‘wash’ as the extra word in 6d. This gives ‘Mikhailovich’ for the patronymic, which is a more usual spelling. Then the wordplay uses one instance of ‘caned’ as the anagram indicator.

]]> By: Mister Sting http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/19/enigmatic-variations-no-992-udergroud-by-loda/#comment-174940 Mister Sting Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:05:19 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36816#comment-174940 You are, of course, completely correct.
It appears that there is a mistake. ‘Fyopor’ would be a silly name, after all.
I have amended the post.

]]> By: Querulous http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/19/enigmatic-variations-no-992-udergroud-by-loda/#comment-174899 Querulous Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:09:39 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36816#comment-174899 I’m slightly confused by 3d – shouldn’t the 2nd and 4th letters be PO rather than DO, i.e. cOmPosed?

]]>