<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7,840/Monk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176073</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Monk
Thanks for dropping in and for confirming that I hadn&#039;t missed something. I spent as long looking for the &#039;extra&#039; as I did solving the puzzle but fortunately I have plenty of spare time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Monk<br />
Thanks for dropping in and for confirming that I hadn&#8217;t missed something. I spent as long looking for the &#8216;extra&#8217; as I did solving the puzzle but fortunately I have plenty of spare time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176064</link>
		<dc:creator>Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog and comments. To Gaufrid @ #10, the Nina is merely the connected anagrams on the first and last row. i.e. nothing very inspired, I&#039;m sorry to say!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog and comments. To Gaufrid @ #10, the Nina is merely the connected anagrams on the first and last row. i.e. nothing very inspired, I&#8217;m sorry to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks all for the pointers and apologies for the ommissons. I blogged this one in a hurry.

I&#039;m not sure I like the RIG dismantled in MADRAS wordplay. For me, MADRAS has to be entirely contained for the word &#039;in&#039; to make sense, and that initial R is sticking out like a sore thumb. Hey ho, horses for courses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all for the pointers and apologies for the ommissons. I blogged this one in a hurry.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I like the RIG dismantled in MADRAS wordplay. For me, MADRAS has to be entirely contained for the word &#8216;in&#8217; to make sense, and that initial R is sticking out like a sore thumb. Hey ho, horses for courses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertandjoyce</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176042</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertandjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We really enjoyed this one. Some original wordplay including &#039;laid back&quot; in 10ac. Brought a smile to our faces, just like &quot;fed up&quot; as mentioned @17. Similarly we thought 25ac was another good piece of clueing. 

We look forward to a challenge on Thursdays. Mind you we also had Anax earlier this week which was a real but enjoyable struggle as well.

Thanks to Ali and Monk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really enjoyed this one. Some original wordplay including &#8216;laid back&#8221; in 10ac. Brought a smile to our faces, just like &#8220;fed up&#8221; as mentioned @17. Similarly we thought 25ac was another good piece of clueing. </p>
<p>We look forward to a challenge on Thursdays. Mind you we also had Anax earlier this week which was a real but enjoyable struggle as well.</p>
<p>Thanks to Ali and Monk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176018</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Monk for an enjoyable crossword and Ali for the blog.

I had 19ac the same way as Gaufrid @2. This seems a perfectly fair device to me.

10ac: We have to take &quot;relaxed&quot; = &quot;laid back&quot; and then turn the word &quot;back&quot; into a reversal indicator. I could only do this because we had recently had &quot;Bored?&quot; = &quot;fed up&quot; = DEF (in a down clue). I said at the time that I thought that was unfair, and here we do not even have the ? to help us. To my mind, crossword solving should be about deducing devices from the wording in the clue, not a series of conventions to be learned. End of moan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Monk for an enjoyable crossword and Ali for the blog.</p>
<p>I had 19ac the same way as Gaufrid @2. This seems a perfectly fair device to me.</p>
<p>10ac: We have to take &#8220;relaxed&#8221; = &#8220;laid back&#8221; and then turn the word &#8220;back&#8221; into a reversal indicator. I could only do this because we had recently had &#8220;Bored?&#8221; = &#8220;fed up&#8221; = DEF (in a down clue). I said at the time that I thought that was unfair, and here we do not even have the ? to help us. To my mind, crossword solving should be about deducing devices from the wording in the clue, not a series of conventions to be learned. End of moan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redddevil</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176016</link>
		<dc:creator>redddevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr A W @15  &quot;In 2d of course you meant HE’S (not HE) in TAURUS.&quot; That&#039;s what I meant but somehow failed to say correctly!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr A W @15  &#8220;In 2d of course you meant HE’S (not HE) in TAURUS.&#8221; That&#8217;s what I meant but somehow failed to say correctly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr A Writinghawk</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176014</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr A Writinghawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Asleep&#039; is a euphemism for &#039;dead&#039; (popular on headstones).

In 2d of course you meant HE&#039;S (not HE) in TAURUS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Asleep&#8217; is a euphemism for &#8216;dead&#8217; (popular on headstones).</p>
<p>In 2d of course you meant HE&#8217;S (not HE) in TAURUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redddevil</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176012</link>
		<dc:creator>redddevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2D needs the &#039;sign&#039; part included to make thesaurus!
Thought anagram at 1D was easy and that gave me a good start. Got extrapolation after spree - not that many 13 letter words beginning with e and meaning inference!
Took a while for the penny to drop with Chinese but enjoyed it when it did.
Thanks to Monk and Ali.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2D needs the &#8216;sign&#8217; part included to make thesaurus!<br />
Thought anagram at 1D was easy and that gave me a good start. Got extrapolation after spree &#8211; not that many 13 letter words beginning with e and meaning inference!<br />
Took a while for the penny to drop with Chinese but enjoyed it when it did.<br />
Thanks to Monk and Ali.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterO</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176008</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[23A: alternatively, a GONER is one who is asleep. Permanently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23A: alternatively, a GONER is one who is asleep. Permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/01/independent-7840monk/#comment-176004</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37406#comment-176004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Ali.

I got off to a flying start with this one, but soon came to a halt.  I wasn&#039;t too enamoured of the OPTIONAL EXTRA/EXTRAPOLATION clues, because you have no way of solving them independently except by guessing at the definitions. I liked the headless hamster in AMSTERDAM.  Haven&#039;t seen much of Monk in recent times, so it was good to grapple with one of his offerings today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ali.</p>
<p>I got off to a flying start with this one, but soon came to a halt.  I wasn&#8217;t too enamoured of the OPTIONAL EXTRA/EXTRAPOLATION clues, because you have no way of solving them independently except by guessing at the definitions. I liked the headless hamster in AMSTERDAM.  Haven&#8217;t seen much of Monk in recent times, so it was good to grapple with one of his offerings today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
