<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyman crossword No 3,400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, Phil, this time it&#039;s you who&#039;s missing the definition! :)
But more about that - of course - not now but later!
Therefore, end of discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Phil, this time it&#8217;s you who&#8217;s missing the definition! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
But more about that &#8211; of course &#8211; not now but later!<br />
Therefore, end of discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176263</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hmmm, Everyman 3401. Isn&#039;t 8d missing a definition. Again?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, Everyman 3401. Isn&#8217;t 8d missing a definition. Again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176219</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stella for the lovely blog.

Everyman&#039;s puzzles never fail to entertain - solving them is a regular part of my Sunday post-prandial routine, when I wouldn&#039;t fancy undertaking anything too taxing. 

Like all the other posters here I was mystified by the absence of a definition for 1d and Sil&#039;s suggestion seems as good an explanation as any. I agree with the comments on &#039;Abstained&#039;, though I must admit that the dodgy grammar did not strike me at the time of solving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stella for the lovely blog.</p>
<p>Everyman&#8217;s puzzles never fail to entertain &#8211; solving them is a regular part of my Sunday post-prandial routine, when I wouldn&#8217;t fancy undertaking anything too taxing. </p>
<p>Like all the other posters here I was mystified by the absence of a definition for 1d and Sil&#8217;s suggestion seems as good an explanation as any. I agree with the comments on &#8216;Abstained&#8217;, though I must admit that the dodgy grammar did not strike me at the time of solving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176218</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, John, you&#039;re right about the construction of 18ac, but the question is: is &#039;on the wagon&#039; a good definition for ABSTAINED? Like others, I think it&#039;s not.

As to 1d: it looks like the definition has simple been edited out. Perhaps, Everyman&#039;s original clue ended in &quot;... bit of rubbish material&quot;, after which the editor thought that &quot;material&quot; wasn&#039;t needed in combination with &quot;rubbish&quot;. I found the word anyway as nothing else did fit.

Many thanks Stella for blogging [just try to divide the number of &#039;your&#039; posters by the number of comments in my latest blog .... :)].
Yes, this puzzle had a different feel compared to the average Everyman. 
And btw, FANNY ABOUT is in Chambers with the definition Everyman gives us.
Everyman - well, he&#039;s in Madeira for a month.
Wish I were ... :) [but I&#039;m not]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, John, you&#8217;re right about the construction of 18ac, but the question is: is &#8216;on the wagon&#8217; a good definition for ABSTAINED? Like others, I think it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>As to 1d: it looks like the definition has simple been edited out. Perhaps, Everyman&#8217;s original clue ended in &#8220;&#8230; bit of rubbish material&#8221;, after which the editor thought that &#8220;material&#8221; wasn&#8217;t needed in combination with &#8220;rubbish&#8221;. I found the word anyway as nothing else did fit.</p>
<p>Many thanks Stella for blogging [just try to divide the number of 'your' posters by the number of comments in my latest blog .... <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ].<br />
Yes, this puzzle had a different feel compared to the average Everyman.<br />
And btw, FANNY ABOUT is in Chambers with the definition Everyman gives us.<br />
Everyman &#8211; well, he&#8217;s in Madeira for a month.<br />
Wish I were &#8230; <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  [but I'm not]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176208</link>
		<dc:creator>John McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re 18 across -- it&#039;s A B(ishop) + stained = spotted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 18 across &#8212; it&#8217;s A B(ishop) + stained = spotted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176204</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I am in Madeira for a month, I have no access to my notes re this crossword. I doubt if they would provide answers to to the problems re ABSTAINED and SEERSUCKER, so please accept my apologies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I am in Madeira for a month, I have no access to my notes re this crossword. I doubt if they would provide answers to to the problems re ABSTAINED and SEERSUCKER, so please accept my apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176201</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Stella, for your blog.

I always enjoy Everyman on a Sunday morning, and this was no exception.  I liked FANNY ABOUT (not a typical Everyman clue, I have to say) and WATERY GRAVE also raised a smile.

I agree with you about ABSTAINED, and can&#039;t throw any light on the lack of a definition for SEERSUCKER, I&#039;m afraid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Stella, for your blog.</p>
<p>I always enjoy Everyman on a Sunday morning, and this was no exception.  I liked FANNY ABOUT (not a typical Everyman clue, I have to say) and WATERY GRAVE also raised a smile.</p>
<p>I agree with you about ABSTAINED, and can&#8217;t throw any light on the lack of a definition for SEERSUCKER, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176200</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stella,

I enjoyed this very much but share your reservations about ABSTAINED. The only way that I can see it working is in the sense &#039;He was on the wagon&#039; and &#039;He abstained&#039; but that includes an additional &#039;was&#039; !.

As to 1d I thought maybe it was &amp;lit and &#039;seersucker&#039; was a type of watch but I cannot confirm this.

There were some excellent surfaces here and I have ticked ten clues which may be a record. Favourites were EXCEL, ALPENHORNS, BANDLEADER and PLUSH.

Thanks Everyman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stella,</p>
<p>I enjoyed this very much but share your reservations about ABSTAINED. The only way that I can see it working is in the sense &#8216;He was on the wagon&#8217; and &#8216;He abstained&#8217; but that includes an additional &#8216;was&#8217; !.</p>
<p>As to 1d I thought maybe it was &amp;lit and &#8216;seersucker&#8217; was a type of watch but I cannot confirm this.</p>
<p>There were some excellent surfaces here and I have ticked ten clues which may be a record. Favourites were EXCEL, ALPENHORNS, BANDLEADER and PLUSH.</p>
<p>Thanks Everyman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosser</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/12/04/everyman-crossword-no-3400/#comment-176195</link>
		<dc:creator>crosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=37276#comment-176195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Stella. Not very taxing, but I too was surprised at the apparent lack of a definition for 1d. Has anyone an explanation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Stella. Not very taxing, but I too was surprised at the apparent lack of a definition for 1d. Has anyone an explanation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
