<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Christmas Prize No 25,514 by Araucaria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-179202</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-179202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Light Infantry Fusil is shown here:
http://therifleshoppe.com/catalog_pages/english_arms/(593).htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Light Infantry Fusil is shown here:<br />
<a href="http://therifleshoppe.com/catalog_pages/english_arms/(593)" rel="nofollow">http://therifleshoppe.com/catalog_pages/english_arms/(593)</a>.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-179155</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-179155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[42dn: FUSILLI
For the second definition, I wondered if &quot;shooter, possibly?&quot;
 meaning &quot;a gun, maybe&quot; could be read as  FUSIL, LI
 i.e. a musket (in the) Light Infantry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>42dn: FUSILLI<br />
For the second definition, I wondered if &#8220;shooter, possibly?&#8221;<br />
 meaning &#8220;a gun, maybe&#8221; could be read as  FUSIL, LI<br />
 i.e. a musket (in the) Light Infantry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrc</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-179118</link>
		<dc:creator>rrc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 11:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-179118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Undefined answers and spoonerisms do not draw me to a crossword, but having got unoriginal I did wonder whether Fagin was right.  Unfortunately I could not find a link with fag and work therefore was hestitant to go for Dickens although I did realise it was his 200yr anniversary. I too was amazed at the number of Dickensian characters who found there way into this puzzle and I am still chuckling over Noggs which I think is absolutely brilliant.  I just wish the way into the crossword had been a little more straight forward then the enjoyment would have been all the greater.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undefined answers and spoonerisms do not draw me to a crossword, but having got unoriginal I did wonder whether Fagin was right.  Unfortunately I could not find a link with fag and work therefore was hestitant to go for Dickens although I did realise it was his 200yr anniversary. I too was amazed at the number of Dickensian characters who found there way into this puzzle and I am still chuckling over Noggs which I think is absolutely brilliant.  I just wish the way into the crossword had been a little more straight forward then the enjoyment would have been all the greater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-179101</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-179101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to bridgesong and Araucaria.   

I solved this quite quickly (for an xmas special). I made a lucky guess and got the theme almost on the first clue.   There after I have to admit cheating and looking up lists of Dickens character names on the web.  I have read many Dickens books, but even the most recent was probably 30 years ago so I could remeber very little.

If you have not seen it already then try &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.ft.com/cms/098371c8-264e-11e1-85fb-00144feabdc0.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gozo&#039;s xmas alphabetical jigsaw&lt;/a&gt; puzzle in the FT.  I thought this was much more of an xmas challenge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to bridgesong and Araucaria.   </p>
<p>I solved this quite quickly (for an xmas special). I made a lucky guess and got the theme almost on the first clue.   There after I have to admit cheating and looking up lists of Dickens character names on the web.  I have read many Dickens books, but even the most recent was probably 30 years ago so I could remeber very little.</p>
<p>If you have not seen it already then try <a href="http://media.ft.com/cms/098371c8-264e-11e1-85fb-00144feabdc0.pdf" rel="nofollow">Gozo&#8217;s xmas alphabetical jigsaw</a> puzzle in the FT.  I thought this was much more of an xmas challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-179078</link>
		<dc:creator>Coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-179078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bogeyman, isn&#039;t it a Spoonerism, not a Malaproprism? That&#039;s the whole point of the clue. Anyway, enjoyed what we could do, loved FAGIN, though our way in was PICKWICK - COPPERFIELD took a while, shamefully! Always interesting to see how everyone gets their way in. Glad I wasn&#039;t the only one who was distracted by Monty Python, Davy!  Happy New Year, all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bogeyman, isn&#8217;t it a Spoonerism, not a Malaproprism? That&#8217;s the whole point of the clue. Anyway, enjoyed what we could do, loved FAGIN, though our way in was PICKWICK &#8211; COPPERFIELD took a while, shamefully! Always interesting to see how everyone gets their way in. Glad I wasn&#8217;t the only one who was distracted by Monty Python, Davy!  Happy New Year, all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogeyman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-178887</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogeyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-178887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised that no-one has mentioned that &quot;Dahls Chickens&quot; is the Big Friendly Giant&#039;s malapropism for Charles Dickens in Roald Dahl&#039;s book, The BFG!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that no-one has mentioned that &#8220;Dahls Chickens&#8221; is the Big Friendly Giant&#8217;s malapropism for Charles Dickens in Roald Dahl&#8217;s book, The BFG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitz</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-178870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-178870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy new year all.

My way in to the theme was via &#039;chicken soup&#039; which led me to &#039;Pumblechook&#039; and hence to &#039;Dahl&#039;s Chickens&#039;.  I&#039;m another that wouldn&#039;t have had a hope without a list of Dickens characters, but even so I found this special less challenging than the August Potter horror.  Kept me pleasantly diverted around Christmas.

Re: Skyscraper.  Is it too convoluted to suggest that &#039;scraper&#039; = &#039;fiddler&#039; (as in violinist) and that Fagin was certainly a fiddler the sense of being a cheat?

Re: Cusack.  I definitely thought of the American Cusacks, especially John and Joan.

In retrospect my favourite is &#039;pole&#039;.  I completely missed the two Dickens characters referred to and was lucky to arrive at the correct answer as a double definition of &#039;measure&#039; and &#039;skim&#039; (as in a punt) being not particularly happy with the latter and baffled by &#039;clay&#039;. 

Finally, I too was tempted by Beadle, but found Merdle just in time.

Thanks for the blog bridgesong, and as ever thanks to the Master.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy new year all.</p>
<p>My way in to the theme was via &#8216;chicken soup&#8217; which led me to &#8216;Pumblechook&#8217; and hence to &#8216;Dahl&#8217;s Chickens&#8217;.  I&#8217;m another that wouldn&#8217;t have had a hope without a list of Dickens characters, but even so I found this special less challenging than the August Potter horror.  Kept me pleasantly diverted around Christmas.</p>
<p>Re: Skyscraper.  Is it too convoluted to suggest that &#8216;scraper&#8217; = &#8216;fiddler&#8217; (as in violinist) and that Fagin was certainly a fiddler the sense of being a cheat?</p>
<p>Re: Cusack.  I definitely thought of the American Cusacks, especially John and Joan.</p>
<p>In retrospect my favourite is &#8216;pole&#8217;.  I completely missed the two Dickens characters referred to and was lucky to arrive at the correct answer as a double definition of &#8216;measure&#8217; and &#8216;skim&#8217; (as in a punt) being not particularly happy with the latter and baffled by &#8216;clay&#8217;. </p>
<p>Finally, I too was tempted by Beadle, but found Merdle just in time.</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog bridgesong, and as ever thanks to the Master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-178868</link>
		<dc:creator>sidey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-178868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds plausible but Fagin wasn&#039;t a pickpocket, he was a fence and a &#039;kidsman&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds plausible but Fagin wasn&#8217;t a pickpocket, he was a fence and a &#8216;kidsman&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-178859</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-178859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[31a - Fagin was a pickpocket.
Sky Rocket is rhyming slang for pocket, hence skyscraper = pickpocket.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>31a &#8211; Fagin was a pickpocket.<br />
Sky Rocket is rhyming slang for pocket, hence skyscraper = pickpocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bridgesong</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/05/guardian-christmas-prize-no-25514-by-araucaria/#comment-178724</link>
		<dc:creator>bridgesong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=38422#comment-178724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tupu@17

Seems plausible to me.  I checked the OED for &quot;skyscraper&quot; without result, but didn&#039;t think to look at the entry for &quot;scraper&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tupu@17</p>
<p>Seems plausible to me.  I checked the OED for &#8220;skyscraper&#8221; without result, but didn&#8217;t think to look at the entry for &#8220;scraper&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
