Comments on: Financial Times no.13,905 by ORENSE http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/19/financial-times-no-13905-by-orense/ Never knowingly undersolved. Fri, 24 May 2013 18:19:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: MikeC http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/19/financial-times-no-13905-by-orense/#comment-180468 MikeC Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:53:34 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39393#comment-180468 Thanks Ringo and Orense. I agree with everything you’ve said, though I parsed 20a as AV and OT, containing c(over) e(agles). Your version makes much better sense!

]]> By: Pelham Barton http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/19/financial-times-no-13905-by-orense/#comment-180437 Pelham Barton Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:27:53 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39393#comment-180437 Thanks Orense for a pleasant crossword and Ringo for the blog.

22ac: Given that the answer is a palindrome, you could justify “about” as a reversal indicator. I very much doubt that Orense meant it that way, but it would be a beautifully subtle touch if he did.

]]>