<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic N° 637, by Hectence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%C2%B0-637-by-hectence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%c2%b0-637-by-hectence/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%c2%b0-637-by-hectence/#comment-181528</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39862#comment-181528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, a bit of stretch for a Quiptic, but do-able.

A couple of decades back The Times used the most succinct clue for 8d, to whit &quot;Sammoc&quot;. A serious groaner!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a bit of stretch for a Quiptic, but do-able.</p>
<p>A couple of decades back The Times used the most succinct clue for 8d, to whit &#8220;Sammoc&#8221;. A serious groaner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosser</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%c2%b0-637-by-hectence/#comment-181458</link>
		<dc:creator>crosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39862#comment-181458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, PeterO. I thought this was more difficult than the usual quiptic. I needed your explanation of 13a which I had got but couldn&#039;t parse, mainly because I had never heard of Edward Very.
I loved 8d. 
Thank you, Hectence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, PeterO. I thought this was more difficult than the usual quiptic. I needed your explanation of 13a which I had got but couldn&#8217;t parse, mainly because I had never heard of Edward Very.<br />
I loved 8d.<br />
Thank you, Hectence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterO</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%c2%b0-637-by-hectence/#comment-181278</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39862#comment-181278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[K&#039;sD - Certainly the puzzle was solvable; I just feel that many complete beginners would lack the confidence to go with half-understood answers, and there are enough of them here to make life difficult. Incidentally, the above is the second published version; in the first, I threw up my hands over SHAGGY in 1D. After a break for Downton Abbey, I returned to sort that one out, and noted that I had described the wordplay in 10A as an anagram rather than a reversal. Of course, that is not wrong - a reversal is a particular case of an anagram.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K&#8217;sD &#8211; Certainly the puzzle was solvable; I just feel that many complete beginners would lack the confidence to go with half-understood answers, and there are enough of them here to make life difficult. Incidentally, the above is the second published version; in the first, I threw up my hands over SHAGGY in 1D. After a break for Downton Abbey, I returned to sort that one out, and noted that I had described the wordplay in 10A as an anagram rather than a reversal. Of course, that is not wrong &#8211; a reversal is a particular case of an anagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%c2%b0-637-by-hectence/#comment-181263</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39862#comment-181263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice crossword, considerably easier than today&#039;s cryptic. Perhaps next time I should start with the Quiptic to get my brain working.

Thanks, PeterO; I had some trouble with RESURGE until I gave up on dr, mb etc for doctor in the clue and realised it was SURGEon. I thought the &#039;up&#039; in 6d was nicely misleading.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice crossword, considerably easier than today&#8217;s cryptic. Perhaps next time I should start with the Quiptic to get my brain working.</p>
<p>Thanks, PeterO; I had some trouble with RESURGE until I gave up on dr, mb etc for doctor in the clue and realised it was SURGEon. I thought the &#8216;up&#8217; in 6d was nicely misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%c2%b0-637-by-hectence/#comment-181243</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39862#comment-181243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Peter.  Not so sure I agree about the difficulty level; I thought it was eminently solvable because of the clear definitions in most clues, as well as in some cases with the enumeration.  I do agree though that it was a Quiptic where you arrived at the answer through crossing letters and the definition more often than through teasing out the wordplay, which in some clues was tricky.  I needed you to explain a couple today, and I didn&#039;t see that SLOE GIN is in fact a reversal and not an anagram.

I laughed at SHAGGY DOG STORY and also liked INVERTED COMMAS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Peter.  Not so sure I agree about the difficulty level; I thought it was eminently solvable because of the clear definitions in most clues, as well as in some cases with the enumeration.  I do agree though that it was a Quiptic where you arrived at the answer through crossing letters and the definition more often than through teasing out the wordplay, which in some clues was tricky.  I needed you to explain a couple today, and I didn&#8217;t see that SLOE GIN is in fact a reversal and not an anagram.</p>
<p>I laughed at SHAGGY DOG STORY and also liked INVERTED COMMAS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/01/30/guardian-quiptic-n%c2%b0-637-by-hectence/#comment-181240</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=39862#comment-181240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks PeterO and Hectence.  Yes, agree - a nice crossword, pitched for a not-so-beginner.

COD 8D INVERTED COMMAS, liked the definition - when it dawned on me.
7D UPGRADE, I think the position of &quot;in&quot; is okay if one reads it as &quot;Argued about {comma or pause} small change in {comma or pause} improved software&quot; - just a bit convoluted, as you say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks PeterO and Hectence.  Yes, agree &#8211; a nice crossword, pitched for a not-so-beginner.</p>
<p>COD 8D INVERTED COMMAS, liked the definition &#8211; when it dawned on me.<br />
7D UPGRADE, I think the position of &#8220;in&#8221; is okay if one reads it as &#8220;Argued about {comma or pause} small change in {comma or pause} improved software&#8221; &#8211; just a bit convoluted, as you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
