<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,553 / Gordius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182276</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it&#039;s a bit late but when I solved 22ac I thought that blue might refer to the fact (I think) that copper gives a blue flame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s a bit late but when I solved 22ac I thought that blue might refer to the fact (I think) that copper gives a blue flame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182271</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late to the party to comment on a puzzle which was so fine overall, yet marred in a few places in awkward ways.  I&#039;ll get my whining out of the way first...

DIEHARD could have had a better clue.  It was the first word I wrote next to it, with only the last D in place.  But I couldn&#039;t justify it.  1, 2, and 3 down are a weird set.  Ellipses are often used just to make a smoother surface, with each clue self-contained, but sometimes they have a strange transitive function.  Not sure what was really intended here.  1D doesn&#039;t need them and was an easy clue.  2D has no cryptic part - I read the &quot;...&quot; as being equal to &quot;...&quot;, end of drab clue.  And 3D completely lacks a definition.  Assembling them into &quot;Brunch equals square meal&quot; is even worse, since it&#039;s not a sentence, not a common phrase, and now the 3-part definition uses one of the solution words in the clues. 

That out of the way, everything between the NW and SE was wonderful and full of variety.  So other than my plaints, thanks for the fun, Gordius, and the fine as always blog, Eileen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the party to comment on a puzzle which was so fine overall, yet marred in a few places in awkward ways.  I&#8217;ll get my whining out of the way first&#8230;</p>
<p>DIEHARD could have had a better clue.  It was the first word I wrote next to it, with only the last D in place.  But I couldn&#8217;t justify it.  1, 2, and 3 down are a weird set.  Ellipses are often used just to make a smoother surface, with each clue self-contained, but sometimes they have a strange transitive function.  Not sure what was really intended here.  1D doesn&#8217;t need them and was an easy clue.  2D has no cryptic part &#8211; I read the &#8220;&#8230;&#8221; as being equal to &#8220;&#8230;&#8221;, end of drab clue.  And 3D completely lacks a definition.  Assembling them into &#8220;Brunch equals square meal&#8221; is even worse, since it&#8217;s not a sentence, not a common phrase, and now the 3-part definition uses one of the solution words in the clues. </p>
<p>That out of the way, everything between the NW and SE was wonderful and full of variety.  So other than my plaints, thanks for the fun, Gordius, and the fine as always blog, Eileen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182267</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward, if the definition had been &#039;mineral&#039; I think you would have a good case.
It was &#039;stone&#039; and therefore chrysolite wins easily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward, if the definition had been &#8216;mineral&#8217; I think you would have a good case.<br />
It was &#8216;stone&#8217; and therefore chrysolite wins easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JollySwagman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182265</link>
		<dc:creator>JollySwagman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@buddy #82

I see. (homophone)

or if you prefer the Latin

Video.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@buddy #82</p>
<p>I see. (homophone)</p>
<p>or if you prefer the Latin</p>
<p>Video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182255</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t there a doubt over whether 13dn is CHRYSOTILE or CHRYSOLITE?  They are both anagrams that are minerals and fit in the grid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there a doubt over whether 13dn is CHRYSOTILE or CHRYSOLITE?  They are both anagrams that are minerals and fit in the grid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182191</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul B (57)
I&#039;ve only just seen it your post and it&#039;s rather too late to comment, but if you do look in here again - yes, I &quot;goofed&quot; too, regarding the Tailor Bird; I had no idea. It&#039;s embarrassing to have exposed my ignorance - and the clue &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an &amp;lit - but on balance I&#039;m rather pleased to have learned that extraordinary fact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul B (57)<br />
I&#8217;ve only just seen it your post and it&#8217;s rather too late to comment, but if you do look in here again &#8211; yes, I &#8220;goofed&#8221; too, regarding the Tailor Bird; I had no idea. It&#8217;s embarrassing to have exposed my ignorance &#8211; and the clue <i>is</i> an &amp;lit &#8211; but on balance I&#8217;m rather pleased to have learned that extraordinary fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182189</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul B,

Also from wikipedia (and not, I promise, added by me)
ic: a rare short version of the Roman numeral XCIX (99)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ic

Not sure if this meets acceptable standards, mind: wikipedia is useful but not always reliable.

Look forward to continuing this discussion next time it&#039;s used!

Matt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul B,</p>
<p>Also from wikipedia (and not, I promise, added by me)<br />
ic: a rare short version of the Roman numeral XCIX (99)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ic" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ic</a></p>
<p>Not sure if this meets acceptable standards, mind: wikipedia is useful but not always reliable.</p>
<p>Look forward to continuing this discussion next time it&#8217;s used!</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182168</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And there was me simply assuming that 99 (cryptically)  meant 1 before 100 and so writing I before C.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there was me simply assuming that 99 (cryptically)  meant 1 before 100 and so writing I before C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182165</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NeilW@38, Thomas99@39,

Thanks for the clear &amp; FULL explanation. I was unaware that the entire clue had to be crucial to the word play. I have seen many clues described as an &amp;lit where this was not the case.

Anyway I would like to edit my original post to include &quot;semi&quot; or &quot;partial&quot;.

As for a last word (just for sheer cheek and at risk of being flamed to death) how about &quot;tendencies far from it&quot; as the anagrind? :-O]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NeilW@38, Thomas99@39,</p>
<p>Thanks for the clear &amp; FULL explanation. I was unaware that the entire clue had to be crucial to the word play. I have seen many clues described as an &amp;lit where this was not the case.</p>
<p>Anyway I would like to edit my original post to include &#8220;semi&#8221; or &#8220;partial&#8221;.</p>
<p>As for a last word (just for sheer cheek and at risk of being flamed to death) how about &#8220;tendencies far from it&#8221; as the anagrind? :-O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/guardian-22553-gordius/#comment-182148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40246#comment-182148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now 80 comments(at the mo), a first for 15/2

CHEEKY was great!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now 80 comments(at the mo), a first for 15/2</p>
<p>CHEEKY was great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
