<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7,899 / Dac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/independent-7899-dac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/independent-7899-dac/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:35:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tokyocolin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/independent-7899-dac/#comment-182138</link>
		<dc:creator>Tokyocolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40251#comment-182138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks RR. I too found this a pleasant stroll. 
In Japan the combover is known as &#039;barcode&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RR. I too found this a pleasant stroll.<br />
In Japan the combover is known as &#8216;barcode&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/independent-7899-dac/#comment-182135</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40251#comment-182135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike RR I found this extraordinarily difficult for a Dac, although no problems at all with it now that it&#039;s done. The usual excellence. Some would cavil at the chestnutty quality of PRONOUNCEMENT, and I never understood NAOMI until reading the blog.

Clive James used to call it a baldy cover-up, a term I use rather than combover because it implies a rather unpleasant vanity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike RR I found this extraordinarily difficult for a Dac, although no problems at all with it now that it&#8217;s done. The usual excellence. Some would cavil at the chestnutty quality of PRONOUNCEMENT, and I never understood NAOMI until reading the blog.</p>
<p>Clive James used to call it a baldy cover-up, a term I use rather than combover because it implies a rather unpleasant vanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/independent-7899-dac/#comment-182126</link>
		<dc:creator>sidey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40251#comment-182126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought Jack&#039;s was longer, donkey&#039;s years ago one paper had pictures of them heading balls to compare the lengths.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Jack&#8217;s was longer, donkey&#8217;s years ago one paper had pictures of them heading balls to compare the lengths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/independent-7899-dac/#comment-182104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40251#comment-182104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, RatkojaRiku.  Bit quiet in here today.  I too found this harder than Dac&#039;s usual Wednesday puzzle.  I&#039;m absolutely certain that he wasn&#039;t in &#039;I&#039;ll show you who&#039;s boss&#039; mode, but it certainly felt like it at times!

It&#039;s all fair (except maybe NAOMI, which I thought was a bit of a liberty) but having got a start, I certainly didn&#039;t find it easy to finish off. PREMATCH NERVES was a lovely anagram and clue, and although I&#039;ve certainly seen the PRONOUN + CEMENTS trick before, it took me a while to see it.

I fancy 5ac should have been (4-4) COMB-OVER (my Collins says so, anyway), but since we haven&#039;t mentioned footie on the Indy thread for at least a week, it gives me a chance to say get well soon to Sir Bobby Charlton, who was probably the most famous person to have flaunted it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, RatkojaRiku.  Bit quiet in here today.  I too found this harder than Dac&#8217;s usual Wednesday puzzle.  I&#8217;m absolutely certain that he wasn&#8217;t in &#8216;I&#8217;ll show you who&#8217;s boss&#8217; mode, but it certainly felt like it at times!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all fair (except maybe NAOMI, which I thought was a bit of a liberty) but having got a start, I certainly didn&#8217;t find it easy to finish off. PREMATCH NERVES was a lovely anagram and clue, and although I&#8217;ve certainly seen the PRONOUN + CEMENTS trick before, it took me a while to see it.</p>
<p>I fancy 5ac should have been (4-4) COMB-OVER (my Collins says so, anyway), but since we haven&#8217;t mentioned footie on the Indy thread for at least a week, it gives me a chance to say get well soon to Sir Bobby Charlton, who was probably the most famous person to have flaunted it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/08/independent-7899-dac/#comment-182087</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40251#comment-182087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks RR unlike yourself I struggled quite a bit, just an off day for me perhaps. Still couldn&#039;t really see cadillac, bit obvious now you&#039;ve pointed it out though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RR unlike yourself I struggled quite a bit, just an off day for me perhaps. Still couldn&#8217;t really see cadillac, bit obvious now you&#8217;ve pointed it out though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
