Comments on: Financial Times 13,914 – Mudd http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/financial-times-13914-mudd/ Never knowingly undersolved. Tue, 21 May 2013 18:38:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Sil van den Hoek http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/financial-times-13914-mudd/#comment-182256 Sil van den Hoek Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:24:32 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40183#comment-182256 jmac @1:
You must be absolutely right.
Many thanks for enlightening me [I am not into golf], but your parsing explains it all.

Thomas99:
Yes, that’s it, of course.
Didn’t think of lush=sot.
So, no hassle with the apostrophe S [and rightly so].

]]> By: Thomas99 http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/financial-times-13914-mudd/#comment-182167 Thomas99 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:01:40 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40183#comment-182167 20d -
I think it has to be lush=sot and hot=h. No anagrams.

]]> By: jmac http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/financial-times-13914-mudd/#comment-182161 jmac Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:39:14 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40183#comment-182161 Hi Sil,

Re 6 down, an albatross is a three under par shot in golf, so unfortnately the clue refers to Tiger Woods rather than Jessica Alba.

]]>