<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Cryptic 25554 Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182341</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And thank you all for your comments!  It&#039;s you for whom the blog&#039;s all about!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thank you all for your comments!  It&#8217;s you for whom the blog&#8217;s all about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182299</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks scchua for putting us out of our misery!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks scchua for putting us out of our misery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182258</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mitz, Robi, togo, Miche, Rich, Giovanna, Miche Doherty, and any others:  Starship was a group from San Fancisco that evolved from Jefferson Airplane.  Its first two hits in the mid-80s were We Built This City (a reference to San Francisco) and Sara, homophone (setter&#039;s device) of Sarah (Ferguson).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mitz, Robi, togo, Miche, Rich, Giovanna, Miche Doherty, and any others:  Starship was a group from San Fancisco that evolved from Jefferson Airplane.  Its first two hits in the mid-80s were We Built This City (a reference to San Francisco) and Sara, homophone (setter&#8217;s device) of Sarah (Ferguson).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182257</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gervase@50, I think one of the reasons why Rufus seems easier to me than other setters is his style of cluing - heavy with cryptic, double and the odd triple definitions, and light on elaborate charades involving reversals, containments/insertions, topping/tailing/disembowelment, and cross-referencing clues.  And I guess I&#039;m better at the former than the latter.  Which illustrates another factor - each individual mind will have different propensities for the different types of intellectual processes required for solving different types of clues (besides vocabulary, knowledge, etc) - it all depends on how your brain has been wired.  Eg. What makes a crossword easier for me is the inclusion of anagrams (but not long ones I&#039;m afraid), just like one of the commenters above.  I wonder what were the conclusions of that student&#039;s research that was publicised on 15sq.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gervase@50, I think one of the reasons why Rufus seems easier to me than other setters is his style of cluing &#8211; heavy with cryptic, double and the odd triple definitions, and light on elaborate charades involving reversals, containments/insertions, topping/tailing/disembowelment, and cross-referencing clues.  And I guess I&#8217;m better at the former than the latter.  Which illustrates another factor &#8211; each individual mind will have different propensities for the different types of intellectual processes required for solving different types of clues (besides vocabulary, knowledge, etc) &#8211; it all depends on how your brain has been wired.  Eg. What makes a crossword easier for me is the inclusion of anagrams (but not long ones I&#8217;m afraid), just like one of the commenters above.  I wonder what were the conclusions of that student&#8217;s research that was publicised on 15sq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanna</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182252</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich @ 52  Well you never know your luck!! 

I once made a wonderful mistake in an ironmonger&#039;s in Paris where I was searching for a knife to cut the bread. I was a young student at the time, short of money but reasonably resourceful. Being unable to recall the French for knife, except that it began with a c, I described its function in great detail. Alas, to the great amusement of the proprietor, the word was culottes!! This was long before they were a fashion item, I hasten to add. Needless to say I have never forgotten couteau and the said knife survived many a student outing round Europe!

Gervase @ 50. Yes it&#039;s most disconcerting. Sometimes it is listed as Monaco di Baviera, which still bears little relation to Munich.

All good fun, though.

Robi @ 47. Thanks, it makes a little more sense now.

Giovanna]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich @ 52  Well you never know your luck!! </p>
<p>I once made a wonderful mistake in an ironmonger&#8217;s in Paris where I was searching for a knife to cut the bread. I was a young student at the time, short of money but reasonably resourceful. Being unable to recall the French for knife, except that it began with a c, I described its function in great detail. Alas, to the great amusement of the proprietor, the word was culottes!! This was long before they were a fashion item, I hasten to add. Needless to say I have never forgotten couteau and the said knife survived many a student outing round Europe!</p>
<p>Gervase @ 50. Yes it&#8217;s most disconcerting. Sometimes it is listed as Monaco di Baviera, which still bears little relation to Munich.</p>
<p>All good fun, though.</p>
<p>Robi @ 47. Thanks, it makes a little more sense now.</p>
<p>Giovanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182247</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting take on crossing letter Gervase.

I have to agree I sometimes find Rufus less accessible than say Paul or Brendan. I had thought it was just the fact that there&#039;s usually a theme and/or that my mind set and general knowledge was compatible with my two favourite setters. 

Your theory may also explain why I found Gordius yesterday easier than I usually do.

Very interesting.

Giovanna @46 

You&#039;re right I never would have guessed Basilea. I remember a seasoned traveller once telling me that if you have some French then adding either a final &#039;E&#039; or &#039;A&#039; and putting on an outrageous accent often delivers comprehensible if not good Italian. He also said it didn&#039;t always work as he had once asked for the bill for lunch by saying &quot;l&#039;addizziona per favore&quot;. At which the English speaking waiter dissolved in floods of laughter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take on crossing letter Gervase.</p>
<p>I have to agree I sometimes find Rufus less accessible than say Paul or Brendan. I had thought it was just the fact that there&#8217;s usually a theme and/or that my mind set and general knowledge was compatible with my two favourite setters. </p>
<p>Your theory may also explain why I found Gordius yesterday easier than I usually do.</p>
<p>Very interesting.</p>
<p>Giovanna @46 </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right I never would have guessed Basilea. I remember a seasoned traveller once telling me that if you have some French then adding either a final &#8216;E&#8217; or &#8216;A&#8217; and putting on an outrageous accent often delivers comprehensible if not good Italian. He also said it didn&#8217;t always work as he had once asked for the bill for lunch by saying &#8220;l&#8217;addizziona per favore&#8221;. At which the English speaking waiter dissolved in floods of laughter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182246</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting thoughts Gervase. Attempting to quantify the unquantifiable,eh?
You have got Rufus as 20% harder than Paul - hard to match with experience.
If the clue is easy, especially if the definition is very obvious, the criteria you mention do not really come into play.
However, I always like to see someone attempting to analyse something, whatever the outcome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts Gervase. Attempting to quantify the unquantifiable,eh?<br />
You have got Rufus as 20% harder than Paul &#8211; hard to match with experience.<br />
If the clue is easy, especially if the definition is very obvious, the criteria you mention do not really come into play.<br />
However, I always like to see someone attempting to analyse something, whatever the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gervase</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182241</link>
		<dc:creator>Gervase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giovanna @46: Re the odd looking Basilea, Italian exonyms are a constant source of delight and bewilderment.  I remember being very confused about the route of a train to &#039;Monaco&#039;, until I realised that this is the Italian name for Munich (or should I say München). 

I have been puzzling over why I found this puzzle so much easier than most other posters seem to have done.  It occurs to me that there are several factors which influence the degree of difficulty of a crossword:

Vocabulary - it helps if you know the words, which in this case I did, fortunately.
Shape of the grid - a lot of unchecked initial letters round the perimeter makes a puzzle trickier for me, but there were none such in this one.
Construction of the clues - Paul&#039;s aren&#039;t the easiest, certainly, but I find it easier to spot the definition in his puzzles than in some others

For me, there is another factor: the nature of the crossing letters.  Uncommon crossing letters can make solutions to the remaining clues easier to find.  I&#039;ve often groaned when a recalcitrant clue has crossing letters which would all score 1 at Scrabble; there seem to be too many possible solutions.  For interest, I have calculated the average Scrabble score of the crossing letters in the four puzzles that have appeared in the Guardian this week.  The results are as follows:

Paul       1.65
Gordius  1.57
Brendan  1.48
Rufus     1.38

Perhaps this is one of the reasons I don&#039;t generally find Rufus&#039;s crosswords as easy as many other do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giovanna @46: Re the odd looking Basilea, Italian exonyms are a constant source of delight and bewilderment.  I remember being very confused about the route of a train to &#8216;Monaco&#8217;, until I realised that this is the Italian name for Munich (or should I say München). </p>
<p>I have been puzzling over why I found this puzzle so much easier than most other posters seem to have done.  It occurs to me that there are several factors which influence the degree of difficulty of a crossword:</p>
<p>Vocabulary &#8211; it helps if you know the words, which in this case I did, fortunately.<br />
Shape of the grid &#8211; a lot of unchecked initial letters round the perimeter makes a puzzle trickier for me, but there were none such in this one.<br />
Construction of the clues &#8211; Paul&#8217;s aren&#8217;t the easiest, certainly, but I find it easier to spot the definition in his puzzles than in some others</p>
<p>For me, there is another factor: the nature of the crossing letters.  Uncommon crossing letters can make solutions to the remaining clues easier to find.  I&#8217;ve often groaned when a recalcitrant clue has crossing letters which would all score 1 at Scrabble; there seem to be too many possible solutions.  For interest, I have calculated the average Scrabble score of the crossing letters in the four puzzles that have appeared in the Guardian this week.  The results are as follows:</p>
<p>Paul       1.65<br />
Gordius  1.57<br />
Brendan  1.48<br />
Rufus     1.38</p>
<p>Perhaps this is one of the reasons I don&#8217;t generally find Rufus&#8217;s crosswords as easy as many other do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua's mum</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182240</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua's mum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late as usual to tackle the crossword, but I think this was one of the best so far this year. Every clue was logical and satisfying, save perhaps 10 across. Many thanks to Paul for giving me a real treat, especially in the Swiss army knife, Palais des Nations and tinseltown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late as usual to tackle the crossword, but I think this was one of the best so far this year. Every clue was logical and satisfying, save perhaps 10 across. Many thanks to Paul for giving me a real treat, especially in the Swiss army knife, Palais des Nations and tinseltown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamestheghillie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/09/guardian-cryptic-25554-paul/#comment-182238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamestheghillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=40273#comment-182238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re making me feel old. 

As any fule kno, a Swiss Army knife also includes (or did) a device for taking stones out of horses hooves!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re making me feel old. </p>
<p>As any fule kno, a Swiss Army knife also includes (or did) a device for taking stones out of horses hooves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
