<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7916/Morph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184277</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brilliant crossword. Hard work but enjoyable - and that&#039;s what it&#039;s all about right? I&#039;m with Richard - Lily of the Valley is genius.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant crossword. Hard work but enjoyable &#8211; and that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about right? I&#8217;m with Richard &#8211; Lily of the Valley is genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morph</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184264</link>
		<dc:creator>Morph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry if you don&#039;t share Richard&#039;s ardour,
Or if you&#039;d like them easier or &#039;arder.
Agree about TE so I will bin it.
And no, there wasn&#039;t any Nina in it.

Thanks for all the comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if you don&#8217;t share Richard&#8217;s ardour,<br />
Or if you&#8217;d like them easier or &#8216;arder.<br />
Agree about TE so I will bin it.<br />
And no, there wasn&#8217;t any Nina in it.</p>
<p>Thanks for all the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertandjoyce</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184253</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertandjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We would agree with KD&#039;s as to the overall impression of the puzzle!  As with crypticsue though, we can&#039;t see why it took so long to finish.
26a brought a smile but that maybe because we thought that &#039;Little Ted&#039; was a character in &#039;Super Ted&#039; that our son used to watch! He drew a fantastic picture of him when he was at Nursery (too long ago to remember- oh dear, we just did!)
Thanks to John and Morph.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would agree with KD&#8217;s as to the overall impression of the puzzle!  As with crypticsue though, we can&#8217;t see why it took so long to finish.<br />
26a brought a smile but that maybe because we thought that &#8216;Little Ted&#8217; was a character in &#8216;Super Ted&#8217; that our son used to watch! He drew a fantastic picture of him when he was at Nursery (too long ago to remember- oh dear, we just did!)<br />
Thanks to John and Morph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, Richard, I beg to differ.  LILY OF THE VALLEY was fun but far from brilliant for me.  The other two you mention were only ordinary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, Richard, I beg to differ.  LILY OF THE VALLEY was fun but far from brilliant for me.  The other two you mention were only ordinary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Heald</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184233</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Heald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wot no praise for LILY OF THE VALLEY?!  Why, this is the most brilliant clue I&#039;ve seen this year so far! (Admittedly, it&#039;s only February ...)

I thought the PECCADILLO clue and DARTBOARD defn were inspired too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wot no praise for LILY OF THE VALLEY?!  Why, this is the most brilliant clue I&#8217;ve seen this year so far! (Admittedly, it&#8217;s only February &#8230;)</p>
<p>I thought the PECCADILLO clue and DARTBOARD defn were inspired too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gaufrid, dear heart, thank you.  I must admit that I expect to know the words in weekday puzzles without having to resort to the dictionaries.

I have now had time to look up LILT as well - to hum!  Would you believe it?  

Morph, please give us an everyday puzzle which doesn&#039;t depend on obscure definitions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaufrid, dear heart, thank you.  I must admit that I expect to know the words in weekday puzzles without having to resort to the dictionaries.</p>
<p>I have now had time to look up LILT as well &#8211; to hum!  Would you believe it?  </p>
<p>Morph, please give us an everyday puzzle which doesn&#8217;t depend on obscure definitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184214</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyable puzzle, in which I found the LHS much harder than the RHS.    16D GARIBALDI was clever and amusing.   Re PEEKABOO I think the defn &#039;containing minor revelations&#039; might (also) refer to fashion style where small amounts of skin are visible.   I was not aware before now of the AMBIANCE spelling but the anagram clue made it bullet-proof and dict confirmed it.   Thanks, Morph, and John.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyable puzzle, in which I found the LHS much harder than the RHS.    16D GARIBALDI was clever and amusing.   Re PEEKABOO I think the defn &#8216;containing minor revelations&#8217; might (also) refer to fashion style where small amounts of skin are visible.   I was not aware before now of the AMBIANCE spelling but the anagram clue made it bullet-proof and dict confirmed it.   Thanks, Morph, and John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184205</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan
&quot;How does ‘typo’ = literal?&quot;

From Chambers under literal: &quot;A wrong letter in printed or typed material. A misprint of a letter in a word (printing)&quot;.

From Chambers under typo: &quot;A typographical error, a literal&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jan<br />
&#8220;How does ‘typo’ = literal?&#8221;</p>
<p>From Chambers under literal: &#8220;A wrong letter in printed or typed material. A misprint of a letter in a word (printing)&#8221;.</p>
<p>From Chambers under typo: &#8220;A typographical error, a literal&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184193</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I knew that I had time for only one crossword today and chose Morph over the others available.  I wish I hadn&#039;t!

Thanks for the blog, John, but I didn&#039;t like the puzzle at all.  For me, the clues were far too long and contrived without even the benefit of a smooth surface in some.

There are many discussions about homonyms so I won&#039;t mention the obvious (ardour does not sound like &#039;arder!).  OK, I mentioned it - sorry. ;) And I am probalby being extremely dim but how do we get from, 10. &#039;Typo picked up in strip&#039; to LITTORAL?  How does &#039;typo&#039; = literal?

As for 26. LILTED - must I confer with Chambers to confirm that it means &#039;humming&#039;?  Despite having L-L-E- I would never have got that!

I have now added Morph to the short list of compilers to avoid when I am short of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that I had time for only one crossword today and chose Morph over the others available.  I wish I hadn&#8217;t!</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog, John, but I didn&#8217;t like the puzzle at all.  For me, the clues were far too long and contrived without even the benefit of a smooth surface in some.</p>
<p>There are many discussions about homonyms so I won&#8217;t mention the obvious (ardour does not sound like &#8216;arder!).  OK, I mentioned it &#8211; sorry. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  And I am probalby being extremely dim but how do we get from, 10. &#8216;Typo picked up in strip&#8217; to LITTORAL?  How does &#8216;typo&#8217; = literal?</p>
<p>As for 26. LILTED &#8211; must I confer with Chambers to confirm that it means &#8216;humming&#8217;?  Despite having L-L-E- I would never have got that!</p>
<p>I have now added Morph to the short list of compilers to avoid when I am short of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/28/independent-7916morph/#comment-184187</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41134#comment-184187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another nice one from Morph.  I&#039;m with you, John, about the absence of a nina; it&#039;s not even a pangram despite the presence of k, v and x.  

I&#039;d not heard of a peccary before, but armadillo was pretty obviously the other mammal in 1a and from the definition the answer had to be PECCADILLO.  

FLY TIPPING raised a smile, remembering all those awful &#039;fly in my soup&#039; jokes - but I won&#039;t invite Gaudfrid&#039;s wrath by repeating any of them.

One or two minor grumbles; for instance isn&#039;t the use of &#039;Lawrence&#039; to clue the letters &#039;te&#039; becoming a bit of a cliché?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another nice one from Morph.  I&#8217;m with you, John, about the absence of a nina; it&#8217;s not even a pangram despite the presence of k, v and x.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d not heard of a peccary before, but armadillo was pretty obviously the other mammal in 1a and from the definition the answer had to be PECCADILLO.  </p>
<p>FLY TIPPING raised a smile, remembering all those awful &#8216;fly in my soup&#8217; jokes &#8211; but I won&#8217;t invite Gaudfrid&#8217;s wrath by repeating any of them.</p>
<p>One or two minor grumbles; for instance isn&#8217;t the use of &#8216;Lawrence&#8217; to clue the letters &#8216;te&#8217; becoming a bit of a cliché?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
