<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,571 &#8211; Araucaria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184543</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I particularly liked 12a  ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particularly liked 12a  <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184537</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard work, but got there, with the odd bit of gadgetting.

sidey, shouldn&#039;t you do a proper job and say which browsers show the clue as intended and which settings affect it? A lot of people on here don&#039;t like messing with settings so tend not to know about them, hence they would appreciate being told properly. I&#039;d do it for you, but I have a poker game just starting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard work, but got there, with the odd bit of gadgetting.</p>
<p>sidey, shouldn&#8217;t you do a proper job and say which browsers show the clue as intended and which settings affect it? A lot of people on here don&#8217;t like messing with settings so tend not to know about them, hence they would appreciate being told properly. I&#8217;d do it for you, but I have a poker game just starting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184536</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Andrew
I am wondering if I missed something @14 re Shallot (small onion)/Shalott (the lady)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew<br />
I am wondering if I missed something @14 re Shallot (small onion)/Shalott (the lady)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184534</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Andrew,

I enjoyed this very much and always seem to be more on A&#039;s wavelength than any other compiler. The only wordplay that I didn&#039;t understand was ONION so thanks for that. I always seem to fall for the number reference that doesn&#039;t refer to a clue but that&#039;s what cryptic clues are about.
I do, however, remain vigilant for the number (nummer) anaesthetic reference.

Lots of good clues today of which I&#039;ll select STRAY, REFUSAL (my COD), ERYNGO, SHALLOT and RELISH,
as favourites. Thanks Arry for a great puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew,</p>
<p>I enjoyed this very much and always seem to be more on A&#8217;s wavelength than any other compiler. The only wordplay that I didn&#8217;t understand was ONION so thanks for that. I always seem to fall for the number reference that doesn&#8217;t refer to a clue but that&#8217;s what cryptic clues are about.<br />
I do, however, remain vigilant for the number (nummer) anaesthetic reference.</p>
<p>Lots of good clues today of which I&#8217;ll select STRAY, REFUSAL (my COD), ERYNGO, SHALLOT and RELISH,<br />
as favourites. Thanks Arry for a great puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184504</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David
25d is indicated by &#039;from&#039; and the container isn&#039;t spelled out.
Keep going you will find that you improve with age (unlike in most other things).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David<br />
25d is indicated by &#8216;from&#8217; and the container isn&#8217;t spelled out.<br />
Keep going you will find that you improve with age (unlike in most other things).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184494</link>
		<dc:creator>David Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitz @29: Many thanks, I was reading &#039;cured&#039; as in &#039;cured meat&#039; so thought &#039;treated&#039; was the definition. You&#039;ve made it lot clearer so thanks. But &#039;of&#039; seems a weak hidden indicator (or maybe it&#039;s just me who&#039;s weak!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitz @29: Many thanks, I was reading &#8216;cured&#8217; as in &#8216;cured meat&#8217; so thought &#8216;treated&#8217; was the definition. You&#8217;ve made it lot clearer so thanks. But &#8216;of&#8217; seems a weak hidden indicator (or maybe it&#8217;s just me who&#8217;s weak!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitz</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David @28: &#039;treated&#039; doesn&#039;t necessarily mean &#039;cured&#039; on its own - only the addition of &#039;successfully&#039; shows that the doctor did the business.  In 19d, the indicator that there is a hidden word is &#039;of&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David @28: &#8216;treated&#8217; doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean &#8216;cured&#8217; on its own &#8211; only the addition of &#8216;successfully&#8217; shows that the doctor did the business.  In 19d, the indicator that there is a hidden word is &#8216;of&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184489</link>
		<dc:creator>David Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My heart sinks when I see it&#039;s an Araucaria puzzle as I know I&#039;ll struggle. This one certainly met my expectations, so many thanks for these explanations Andrew, or I&#039;d never finish. Just a couple of questions: what&#039;s &#039;successfully&#039; doing in 13a (other than serving to confuse)? And doesn&#039;t 19d need an indicator to show it&#039;s hidden?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My heart sinks when I see it&#8217;s an Araucaria puzzle as I know I&#8217;ll struggle. This one certainly met my expectations, so many thanks for these explanations Andrew, or I&#8217;d never finish. Just a couple of questions: what&#8217;s &#8216;successfully&#8217; doing in 13a (other than serving to confuse)? And doesn&#8217;t 19d need an indicator to show it&#8217;s hidden?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184418</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks all
I guess you themists must be delighted. Especially those from Yorkshire.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all<br />
I guess you themists must be delighted. Especially those from Yorkshire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KayOz</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/02/29/guardian-25571-araucaria/#comment-184414</link>
		<dc:creator>KayOz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=41188#comment-184414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you to Araucaria and Andrew.

A very enjoyable outing. Unlike most people I start anywhere in the puzzle. First in was 11a Orpen (guessed, not heard of before), then 2d Tulip, then 1d Bulbous. That led to a lot of the other answers.

I see the &#039;in there&#039; clues straight away. It annoys the shit out of my partner. He can see anagrams from 50 paces and give you all the options. Yesterday, I &#039;relish&#039;ed the inclusion of &#039;extremity&#039; in a sentence. I thought it was pretty clever because it is a devilishly difficult word to fit into anything.

I am in awe of most crossword setters. 

I hadn&#039;t heard of a CATBOAT 28a before but it was easy enough to work out. I mistakenly worked a while with lethargic instead of Lassitude. I liked 22a A long haul - heehe. You gotta love the old master.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you to Araucaria and Andrew.</p>
<p>A very enjoyable outing. Unlike most people I start anywhere in the puzzle. First in was 11a Orpen (guessed, not heard of before), then 2d Tulip, then 1d Bulbous. That led to a lot of the other answers.</p>
<p>I see the &#8216;in there&#8217; clues straight away. It annoys the shit out of my partner. He can see anagrams from 50 paces and give you all the options. Yesterday, I &#8216;relish&#8217;ed the inclusion of &#8216;extremity&#8217; in a sentence. I thought it was pretty clever because it is a devilishly difficult word to fit into anything.</p>
<p>I am in awe of most crossword setters. </p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of a CATBOAT 28a before but it was easy enough to work out. I mistakenly worked a while with lethargic instead of Lassitude. I liked 22a A long haul &#8211; heehe. You gotta love the old master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
