<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic N° 645, by Nutmeg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/26/guardian-quiptic-n-645-by-nutmeg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/26/guardian-quiptic-n-645-by-nutmeg/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy smith</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/26/guardian-quiptic-n-645-by-nutmeg/#comment-188181</link>
		<dc:creator>andy smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42193#comment-188181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Peter O. I found the SW as tough or tougher than most of the regular cryptics. Couldn&#039;t see 18 at all before coming here - why &#039;regular&#039; anyway ? Overall very neat (TY Nutmeg), but in terms of the Quiptic brief I doubt if many beginners or those in a hurry completed it ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter O. I found the SW as tough or tougher than most of the regular cryptics. Couldn&#8217;t see 18 at all before coming here &#8211; why &#8216;regular&#8217; anyway ? Overall very neat (TY Nutmeg), but in terms of the Quiptic brief I doubt if many beginners or those in a hurry completed it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/26/guardian-quiptic-n-645-by-nutmeg/#comment-188133</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42193#comment-188133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this on the tough side for one of these. Not entirely sure why in retrospect though.

Hah. I was about to mutter about brought=bore when I finally remembered a usage I don&#039;t use!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this on the tough side for one of these. Not entirely sure why in retrospect though.</p>
<p>Hah. I was about to mutter about brought=bore when I finally remembered a usage I don&#8217;t use!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterO</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/26/guardian-quiptic-n-645-by-nutmeg/#comment-188071</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42193#comment-188071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[crosser - it&#039;s good to hear from someone! I think you are right - the definition was so obviously in the right general area that I did not question it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crosser &#8211; it&#8217;s good to hear from someone! I think you are right &#8211; the definition was so obviously in the right general area that I did not question it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosser</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/26/guardian-quiptic-n-645-by-nutmeg/#comment-188065</link>
		<dc:creator>crosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42193#comment-188065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, PeterO, but surely &quot;bigotry&quot; and &quot;hatred&quot; are not synonymous? Wouldn&#039;t &quot;intolerance&quot; have been a better definition?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, PeterO, but surely &#8220;bigotry&#8221; and &#8220;hatred&#8221; are not synonymous? Wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;intolerance&#8221; have been a better definition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
