<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,964 by Cinephile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/28/financial-times-13964-by-cinephile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/28/financial-times-13964-by-cinephile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/28/financial-times-13964-by-cinephile/#comment-188270</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42303#comment-188270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#039;d see it like that, but, as you know, there are no absolutely agreed &#039;rules&#039; in this game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;d see it like that, but, as you know, there are no absolutely agreed &#8216;rules&#8217; in this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/28/financial-times-13964-by-cinephile/#comment-188267</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42303#comment-188267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nmsindy - so the rule could be &quot;definition and wordplay should be disjoint, though they may refer to one another&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nmsindy &#8211; so the rule could be &#8220;definition and wordplay should be disjoint, though they may refer to one another&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/28/financial-times-13964-by-cinephile/#comment-188260</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42303#comment-188260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think there is &#039;double duty&#039; in 10A.   I think the definition is just &#039;Hibernian&#039;.  Then the separate wordplay gives H (its first - admittedly referring back to Hibernian but I think this is fair as it&#039;s using the word in a different, separate, way) following IRIS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is &#8216;double duty&#8217; in 10A.   I think the definition is just &#8216;Hibernian&#8217;.  Then the separate wordplay gives H (its first &#8211; admittedly referring back to Hibernian but I think this is fair as it&#8217;s using the word in a different, separate, way) following IRIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/28/financial-times-13964-by-cinephile/#comment-188256</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42303#comment-188256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks PeeDee. I enjoyed this example of Cinephile’s wit and wisdom although there seemed to be a rather morbid thread with Cholera, Phthisis and Rigor Mortis. As usual, the Reverend takes a few liberties. There was no satisfactory definition for Rigor Mortis. Consignia should probably have been defined as former mail company as it only lasted 18 months before it changed its name back to The Royal Mail. I also did not like the definition of One Or Two as “three or more” but that is probably just my literal-mindedness as I see that Chambers defines it as “a few” which seems fair enough.

I finished with the blindingly obvious Phthisis because it took me some time to accept that the word really exists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks PeeDee. I enjoyed this example of Cinephile’s wit and wisdom although there seemed to be a rather morbid thread with Cholera, Phthisis and Rigor Mortis. As usual, the Reverend takes a few liberties. There was no satisfactory definition for Rigor Mortis. Consignia should probably have been defined as former mail company as it only lasted 18 months before it changed its name back to The Royal Mail. I also did not like the definition of One Or Two as “three or more” but that is probably just my literal-mindedness as I see that Chambers defines it as “a few” which seems fair enough.</p>
<p>I finished with the blindingly obvious Phthisis because it took me some time to accept that the word really exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
