<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times no.13,965 by LOROSO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pogel</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188385</link>
		<dc:creator>Pogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I convinced myself the director was Spielberg - spiel/pitch - and then gave myself a headache trying to justify the berg...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I convinced myself the director was Spielberg &#8211; spiel/pitch &#8211; and then gave myself a headache trying to justify the berg&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188371</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone - sorry I&#039;m late! Many thanks to Ringo for blogging and to everyone for their comments. Delighted that Lenny makes mention of my mentor; Roger played &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; major role in getting my crossword career off the ground. I&#039;ve always tried to write clues in as individual a way as I can but it&#039;s great to know that bits of Roger&#039;s influence come through from time to time - it&#039;s unintentional but I&#039;m glad it&#039;s there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone &#8211; sorry I&#8217;m late! Many thanks to Ringo for blogging and to everyone for their comments. Delighted that Lenny makes mention of my mentor; Roger played <i>the</i> major role in getting my crossword career off the ground. I&#8217;ve always tried to write clues in as individual a way as I can but it&#8217;s great to know that bits of Roger&#8217;s influence come through from time to time &#8211; it&#8217;s unintentional but I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crypticsue</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188345</link>
		<dc:creator>crypticsue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few Loroso&#039;s ago, I made what turns out now to have been an error in saying that I thought Loroso was user-friendly Anax.   Since then he has upped the toughness and today&#039;s puzzle, although great fun, did take me a while to sort out.   Thanks to him and Ringo too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few Loroso&#8217;s ago, I made what turns out now to have been an error in saying that I thought Loroso was user-friendly Anax.   Since then he has upped the toughness and today&#8217;s puzzle, although great fun, did take me a while to sort out.   Thanks to him and Ringo too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188342</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marvellous, if difficult, crossword. Thanks for the explanations of SASQUATCH and PROFESSOR, which I got (in the end) without parsing. Held myself up for ages by entering BRUSQUE instead of BRUISER. The definition (tough) was a bit of a stretch, but the wordplay seemed to work: B for bishop, RU&#039;S for game is, and QUE for queen... It even gave me a crossing Q for sasquatch, but in the wrong place. Failed on the choreographer.

COLOSSIANS my runaway favourite. Reminded me of the trick for remembering the epistles in the right order: A,E,I,O,U. This gives galAtians, ephEsians, philIppians, colOssians, and... thUssalonians.

Many thanks Ringo and Anax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvellous, if difficult, crossword. Thanks for the explanations of SASQUATCH and PROFESSOR, which I got (in the end) without parsing. Held myself up for ages by entering BRUSQUE instead of BRUISER. The definition (tough) was a bit of a stretch, but the wordplay seemed to work: B for bishop, RU&#8217;S for game is, and QUE for queen&#8230; It even gave me a crossing Q for sasquatch, but in the wrong place. Failed on the choreographer.</p>
<p>COLOSSIANS my runaway favourite. Reminded me of the trick for remembering the epistles in the right order: A,E,I,O,U. This gives galAtians, ephEsians, philIppians, colOssians, and&#8230; thUssalonians.</p>
<p>Many thanks Ringo and Anax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188341</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, this was very good indeed.   Esp liked THATCHING, TRUTH DRUG, NOT WITH IT, COLOSSIANS (my last answer), GARBLED.  All totally fair, and, yes, on the tough side.   Thanks LOROSO and Ringo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this was very good indeed.   Esp liked THATCHING, TRUTH DRUG, NOT WITH IT, COLOSSIANS (my last answer), GARBLED.  All totally fair, and, yes, on the tough side.   Thanks LOROSO and Ringo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188338</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Invigorating indeed Ringo, and a lot more difficult than this week’s Anax. I loved Air Kiss, Colossians and Not With It. Loroso normally has a very different style from his erstwhile mentor, Roger Squires but some of the clues today, particularly the one for Truth Drug certainly bear the ring of the master of the cryptic definition.
 
Ruth St Denis was new to me. I thought Sasquatch was also new to me but it must have been at the back of my mind somewhere because, otherwise, I would never have worked it out from the wordplay.

Who would guess that there are two 9-letter directors beginning with Tar…? I too hastily wrote in Tarkovski before finding that it did not fit in with Cairo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invigorating indeed Ringo, and a lot more difficult than this week’s Anax. I loved Air Kiss, Colossians and Not With It. Loroso normally has a very different style from his erstwhile mentor, Roger Squires but some of the clues today, particularly the one for Truth Drug certainly bear the ring of the master of the cryptic definition.</p>
<p>Ruth St Denis was new to me. I thought Sasquatch was also new to me but it must have been at the back of my mind somewhere because, otherwise, I would never have worked it out from the wordplay.</p>
<p>Who would guess that there are two 9-letter directors beginning with Tar…? I too hastily wrote in Tarkovski before finding that it did not fit in with Cairo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188329</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Loroso for an enjoyable puzzle and Ringo for the blog. Favourite clue 3dn: punctuation is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; to be ignored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Loroso for an enjoyable puzzle and Ringo for the blog. Favourite clue 3dn: punctuation is <i>not</i> to be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ringo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188325</link>
		<dc:creator>Ringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, thanks Togo - I had the &#039;squatch&#039; part, but SA had me stumped. It&#039;s not an abbreviation that readily comes to mind for me. All updated now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, thanks Togo &#8211; I had the &#8216;squatch&#8217; part, but SA had me stumped. It&#8217;s not an abbreviation that readily comes to mind for me. All updated now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: togo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188324</link>
		<dc:creator>togo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mmm.  Maybe sasquatch is zip=nothing=squat (from diddley-squat?) opening (between) it = Sex Appeal) and CH as the starts to convince and her....  Wish professor would explain itself though.  Very much agree with your Bravo re: Colossians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmm.  Maybe sasquatch is zip=nothing=squat (from diddley-squat?) opening (between) it = Sex Appeal) and CH as the starts to convince and her&#8230;.  Wish professor would explain itself though.  Very much agree with your Bravo re: Colossians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ringo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/03/29/financial-times-no-13965-by-loroso/#comment-188323</link>
		<dc:creator>Ringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42350#comment-188323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Togo, meant to go back and fill those in... but forgot. Have updated PROFESSOR now. Still working on SASQUATCH...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Togo, meant to go back and fill those in&#8230; but forgot. Have updated PROFESSOR now. Still working on SASQUATCH&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
