<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Genius 105 / Crucible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trebor</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/#comment-188829</link>
		<dc:creator>Trebor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42397#comment-188829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this was great. Had to resort to google to verify a few (I just accept this with Genius, EV etc) but nothing too obscure.
Absolutely loved the idea and look forward to someone doing a &quot;Heroes and Villians&quot; or opposites themed puzzle along the same lines...

Like Duncan I was also held up as a result of confidently putting Harris in for the Lewis partner. I think that would have been a better answer - a sort of &amp;lit that even encompassed the connection.

Very much nitpicking now, so I&#039;ll end by thanking Crucible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was great. Had to resort to google to verify a few (I just accept this with Genius, EV etc) but nothing too obscure.<br />
Absolutely loved the idea and look forward to someone doing a &#8220;Heroes and Villians&#8221; or opposites themed puzzle along the same lines&#8230;</p>
<p>Like Duncan I was also held up as a result of confidently putting Harris in for the Lewis partner. I think that would have been a better answer &#8211; a sort of &amp;lit that even encompassed the connection.</p>
<p>Very much nitpicking now, so I&#8217;ll end by thanking Crucible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: briggg</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/#comment-188624</link>
		<dc:creator>briggg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42397#comment-188624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I solved all but five of the clues in my first sitting but was dismayed to find I had lost my print-out the following day and could only remember half a dozen. Started up again and solved all but Jeff/Mutt (though Lewis/Martin held me up, like many I couldn&#039;t get Harris out of my mind even though it wouldn&#039;t fit.)
Mutt &amp; Jeff was hidden away in a recess but I wasted far too much time trying to fit mote (&amp;beam?) or Myth (&amp;lore????)in. Doubly exasperating as I had Je in mind as the French setter on the first pass.
This was a Genius set at the right level for me, after a couple in Jan &amp; Feb that I got bored with before making any break through. This was exasperating but very definitely rewarding. Thanks Crucible and thanks Duncan for the blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I solved all but five of the clues in my first sitting but was dismayed to find I had lost my print-out the following day and could only remember half a dozen. Started up again and solved all but Jeff/Mutt (though Lewis/Martin held me up, like many I couldn&#8217;t get Harris out of my mind even though it wouldn&#8217;t fit.)<br />
Mutt &amp; Jeff was hidden away in a recess but I wasted far too much time trying to fit mote (&amp;beam?) or Myth (&amp;lore????)in. Doubly exasperating as I had Je in mind as the French setter on the first pass.<br />
This was a Genius set at the right level for me, after a couple in Jan &amp; Feb that I got bored with before making any break through. This was exasperating but very definitely rewarding. Thanks Crucible and thanks Duncan for the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crucible</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/#comment-188596</link>
		<dc:creator>Crucible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42397#comment-188596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to have disappointed you, Jan. And thanks for the detailed blog, Duncan. I&#039;m not going to apologise for 22d, though I never expected it to be such a stumbling block. To me, the pairing trips off the tongue but then ... As I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll be glad to know, if you wait a few months, there might just be &quot;Partners: the Sequel&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to have disappointed you, Jan. And thanks for the detailed blog, Duncan. I&#8217;m not going to apologise for 22d, though I never expected it to be such a stumbling block. To me, the pairing trips off the tongue but then &#8230; As I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll be glad to know, if you wait a few months, there might just be &#8220;Partners: the Sequel&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/#comment-188547</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 22:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42397#comment-188547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Duncan for well-coloured blog.

These are the (rather lengthy) notes I made on completion

I found this a hard challenge.  It took three sessions before it was completed.

I have looked back through the 225 archives and find that I usually like Crucible&#039;s Genius puzzles.  I can&#039;t say that I liked this one.

Having to solve seventeen clues from the wordplay only and with no letters to help, I nearly gave up.  I actually solved four of them backwards: finding a word which fit the grid, did it have a pair? and, if so, could I make that word fit the clue?

It took a long time to see how, SKULL worked (I had US and LL), ONIONS (I had ON from &#039;bone marrow&#039; but I never remember the cricket defintion of  &#039;leg&#039;) and JEFF got the biggest groan. I was about to look up the French for &#039;setter&#039; despite knowing that &#039;setter&#039; is I or me.  I was also tempted by &#039;hare and hound&#039; and &#039;March hare&#039; at 21a.  I felt a bit of a berk (and hair)!

I didn&#039;t enjoy the puzzle but I enjoyed the challenge.  Does that make sense?  If I hadn&#039;t managed to finish it, with a complete understanding, I would have hated it.  I think there were too many unknowns for me: a theme so broad with proper nouns included.

Crucible, you did a grand job, and the more I think about what to say the more I realise that, actually, I must have enjoyed it.  There, in writing down my comments I&#039;ve managed to change my own mind.  It was probably the recollection of trying to think of the names of breeds of hens when I asked my husband to give a four-letter word for chicken and he said, &quot;Fowl&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Duncan for well-coloured blog.</p>
<p>These are the (rather lengthy) notes I made on completion</p>
<p>I found this a hard challenge.  It took three sessions before it was completed.</p>
<p>I have looked back through the 225 archives and find that I usually like Crucible&#8217;s Genius puzzles.  I can&#8217;t say that I liked this one.</p>
<p>Having to solve seventeen clues from the wordplay only and with no letters to help, I nearly gave up.  I actually solved four of them backwards: finding a word which fit the grid, did it have a pair? and, if so, could I make that word fit the clue?</p>
<p>It took a long time to see how, SKULL worked (I had US and LL), ONIONS (I had ON from &#8216;bone marrow&#8217; but I never remember the cricket defintion of  &#8216;leg&#8217;) and JEFF got the biggest groan. I was about to look up the French for &#8216;setter&#8217; despite knowing that &#8216;setter&#8217; is I or me.  I was also tempted by &#8216;hare and hound&#8217; and &#8216;March hare&#8217; at 21a.  I felt a bit of a berk (and hair)!</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t enjoy the puzzle but I enjoyed the challenge.  Does that make sense?  If I hadn&#8217;t managed to finish it, with a complete understanding, I would have hated it.  I think there were too many unknowns for me: a theme so broad with proper nouns included.</p>
<p>Crucible, you did a grand job, and the more I think about what to say the more I realise that, actually, I must have enjoyed it.  There, in writing down my comments I&#8217;ve managed to change my own mind.  It was probably the recollection of trying to think of the names of breeds of hens when I asked my husband to give a four-letter word for chicken and he said, &#8220;Fowl&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/#comment-188530</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42397#comment-188530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Duncan

In my normal way I managed to get this finished just yesterday [4 out of last 6 occasions - I wish there were a prize for the latest correct entered solution, I&#039;d win it every month!].

I tend to try and do these crosswords throughout the month, and then get serious about it in the last few days.

I was stuck on 22d for over a week.  Despite me living in the USA and having an American wife I had never heard of the comic pairing, nor the cockney rhyming slang.  I was convinced the answer would be MYTH and would have put that in before the deadline if I had not managed to crack the Nice Setter bit yesterday morning.  I did not know FF for folios either, but with the JE worked out I went through every combination of letters and reverse engineered the answer in about 3 stages.  I&#039;m not sure whether I was proud of myself or just plain relieved at the end.  I&#039;ll be interested to learn how many other Guardian readers knew of this comic pair - certainly I would not say they were a &#039;well-known&#039; pairing unless I&#039;ve been living in a cave for the last 60 years.

Well done for a nice blog Duncan, and also Crucible for a very enjoyable 28/29 clues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Duncan</p>
<p>In my normal way I managed to get this finished just yesterday [4 out of last 6 occasions - I wish there were a prize for the latest correct entered solution, I'd win it every month!].</p>
<p>I tend to try and do these crosswords throughout the month, and then get serious about it in the last few days.</p>
<p>I was stuck on 22d for over a week.  Despite me living in the USA and having an American wife I had never heard of the comic pairing, nor the cockney rhyming slang.  I was convinced the answer would be MYTH and would have put that in before the deadline if I had not managed to crack the Nice Setter bit yesterday morning.  I did not know FF for folios either, but with the JE worked out I went through every combination of letters and reverse engineered the answer in about 3 stages.  I&#8217;m not sure whether I was proud of myself or just plain relieved at the end.  I&#8217;ll be interested to learn how many other Guardian readers knew of this comic pair &#8211; certainly I would not say they were a &#8216;well-known&#8217; pairing unless I&#8217;ve been living in a cave for the last 60 years.</p>
<p>Well done for a nice blog Duncan, and also Crucible for a very enjoyable 28/29 clues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman L in France</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/01/guardian-genius-105-crucible/#comment-188517</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman L in France</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42397#comment-188517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Duncan. Always hard to remember what happened a month ago, but I do recall entering sausage instead of bangers and only twigging after an hour or so. Jeff was wonderful, and gave lots of us on the Guardian website no end of trouble. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever read the comic strip but it was certainly floating around in the recesses of my mind, including the rhyming slang.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Duncan. Always hard to remember what happened a month ago, but I do recall entering sausage instead of bangers and only twigging after an hour or so. Jeff was wonderful, and gave lots of us on the Guardian website no end of trouble. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever read the comic strip but it was certainly floating around in the recesses of my mind, including the rhyming slang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
