<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inquisitor 1222: JOINER by Hypnos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/04/inquisitor-1222-joiner-by-hypnos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/04/inquisitor-1222-joiner-by-hypnos/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: regalize</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/04/inquisitor-1222-joiner-by-hypnos/#comment-188982</link>
		<dc:creator>regalize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42217#comment-188982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit late to the thread. Thanks to Hi, ho and ba for the excellent blog and to Hypnos for a puzzle that was far from a snooze. 36a did need triple cross-referencing to solve, but did not detract from the enjoyment of the clue. Drudge/trudge? I thought it was close enough and definable enough. Common usage has its place in good crosswords, even when the &#039;bible&#039; does not define it. Creating the character helped to ascertain where those pesky letters should be.... I think!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit late to the thread. Thanks to Hi, ho and ba for the excellent blog and to Hypnos for a puzzle that was far from a snooze. 36a did need triple cross-referencing to solve, but did not detract from the enjoyment of the clue. Drudge/trudge? I thought it was close enough and definable enough. Common usage has its place in good crosswords, even when the &#8216;bible&#8217; does not define it. Creating the character helped to ascertain where those pesky letters should be&#8230;. I think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HolyGhost</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/04/inquisitor-1222-joiner-by-hypnos/#comment-188844</link>
		<dc:creator>HolyGhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42217#comment-188844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good stuff from Hypnos, with a mildly tricksy endgame. 

I too tripped up over &quot;drudge&quot;/&quot;trudge&quot; initially, and eventually decided that &quot;iron&quot;=&quot;resolution&quot; was OK. 

The location of the blank squares seemed to be forced except for &quot;noB&quot; + &quot;Base&quot; and for &quot;mAt&quot; (the latter making the intersecting 17d CREDO my last entry), but that was resolved so as to produce an ampersand. 

Whether or not to &#039;join the dots&#039; to create the character itself? The rubric says that the &quot;[joiner] &lt;b&gt;can&lt;/b&gt; be found in the grid&quot; (my emphasis) &#8211; is this to be taken literally or are we to do it? Unsure. 

I always appreciate it when the setter comments on the comments - it confirms they read the blog, and care (but I feel it tends to close off the conversation - don&#039;t know if they read later comments). But thanks to all: setter, blogger, and those making comments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff from Hypnos, with a mildly tricksy endgame. </p>
<p>I too tripped up over &#8220;drudge&#8221;/&#8221;trudge&#8221; initially, and eventually decided that &#8220;iron&#8221;=&#8221;resolution&#8221; was OK. </p>
<p>The location of the blank squares seemed to be forced except for &#8220;noB&#8221; + &#8220;Base&#8221; and for &#8220;mAt&#8221; (the latter making the intersecting 17d CREDO my last entry), but that was resolved so as to produce an ampersand. </p>
<p>Whether or not to &#8216;join the dots&#8217; to create the character itself? The rubric says that the &#8220;[joiner] <b>can</b> be found in the grid&#8221; (my emphasis) &ndash; is this to be taken literally or are we to do it? Unsure. </p>
<p>I always appreciate it when the setter comments on the comments &#8211; it confirms they read the blog, and care (but I feel it tends to close off the conversation &#8211; don&#8217;t know if they read later comments). But thanks to all: setter, blogger, and those making comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/04/inquisitor-1222-joiner-by-hypnos/#comment-188821</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42217#comment-188821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Hihoba, for an excellent blog and Hypnos for a well-integrated puzzle.   Like you I found it an easier start than a finish with the blanks adding quite a dimension of difficulty.   But I got there.   In end the only doubt about placing that I had was the A in MAT, but, after some thought, I felt it had to go exactly where you have put it.    

I may be totally wrong in this but I did not think the ampersand had to be drawn ie that the blank squares would be sufficient to show it.  I also thought once SAND was given as a colour in Chambers that there was no problem there but I&#039;ll admit I was toying with WELSH NOVELIST for quite a while before I sorted things out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Hihoba, for an excellent blog and Hypnos for a well-integrated puzzle.   Like you I found it an easier start than a finish with the blanks adding quite a dimension of difficulty.   But I got there.   In end the only doubt about placing that I had was the A in MAT, but, after some thought, I felt it had to go exactly where you have put it.    </p>
<p>I may be totally wrong in this but I did not think the ampersand had to be drawn ie that the blank squares would be sufficient to show it.  I also thought once SAND was given as a colour in Chambers that there was no problem there but I&#8217;ll admit I was toying with WELSH NOVELIST for quite a while before I sorted things out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hypnos</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/04/inquisitor-1222-joiner-by-hypnos/#comment-188762</link>
		<dc:creator>Hypnos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42217#comment-188762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks to Hihoba for the fascinating and detailed blog.

Just to respond to your queries, in 15a, &quot;drudge&quot; was being used as a reasonably close synonym for &quot;plod&quot; (both are given in Chambers as verbs meaning to work laboriously). There was no intention to use &quot;trudge&quot; or to create any additional misprint. In 36a, &quot;resolution&quot; was indeed being used as a synonym for &quot;iron&quot; (iron=strength=resolution).

I&#039;ve not read Simon Garfield&#039;s book but will try to dip into it now you&#039;ve mentioned it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks to Hihoba for the fascinating and detailed blog.</p>
<p>Just to respond to your queries, in 15a, &#8220;drudge&#8221; was being used as a reasonably close synonym for &#8220;plod&#8221; (both are given in Chambers as verbs meaning to work laboriously). There was no intention to use &#8220;trudge&#8221; or to create any additional misprint. In 36a, &#8220;resolution&#8221; was indeed being used as a synonym for &#8220;iron&#8221; (iron=strength=resolution).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not read Simon Garfield&#8217;s book but will try to dip into it now you&#8217;ve mentioned it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lowe</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/04/inquisitor-1222-joiner-by-hypnos/#comment-188756</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42217#comment-188756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Hi for a detailed blog. I agree with your queries: I also had Drudge as a misprint for Trudge in 15A, until it didn&#039;t fit the definition of Ampersand, and the best I can find for iron/resolution in Chambers is &quot;Ironside or Ironsides n a nickname for a man of iron resolution (eg Oliver Cromwell)&quot;. It doesn&#039;t quite satisfy the clue, though.

I couldn&#039;t do the bottom left until I could guess the unclued entries for some extra letters to help. I enjoyed the concealed one-letter answer to 14A - one-letter answers to crossword clues are not common!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Hi for a detailed blog. I agree with your queries: I also had Drudge as a misprint for Trudge in 15A, until it didn&#8217;t fit the definition of Ampersand, and the best I can find for iron/resolution in Chambers is &#8220;Ironside or Ironsides n a nickname for a man of iron resolution (eg Oliver Cromwell)&#8221;. It doesn&#8217;t quite satisfy the clue, though.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t do the bottom left until I could guess the unclued entries for some extra letters to help. I enjoyed the concealed one-letter answer to 14A &#8211; one-letter answers to crossword clues are not common!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
