<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7955 / Phi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189696</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 06:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Started late and didn&#039;t get very far, but my subconscious must have been working on it overnight &#039;cos I finished it this morning with no recourse to e-help, just the occasional check in the (dead tree) dictionary.  Yes, tougher than the usual phi.
I agree with Peter O&#039;s parsing of 19d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Started late and didn&#8217;t get very far, but my subconscious must have been working on it overnight &#8216;cos I finished it this morning with no recourse to e-help, just the occasional check in the (dead tree) dictionary.  Yes, tougher than the usual phi.<br />
I agree with Peter O&#8217;s parsing of 19d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189685</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I dunno. It seems to me that in a daily puzzle, unthemed, there&#039;s no need to include recondite answers. If themed then yay, but keep them to an incredibly strict minimum. There are some who might disagree, Don among them (as I recall), but in a daily puzzle we are trying to entertain rather than &#039;educate&#039; (whatever that means in a bloomin&#039; crossword puzzle).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I dunno. It seems to me that in a daily puzzle, unthemed, there&#8217;s no need to include recondite answers. If themed then yay, but keep them to an incredibly strict minimum. There are some who might disagree, Don among them (as I recall), but in a daily puzzle we are trying to entertain rather than &#8216;educate&#8217; (whatever that means in a bloomin&#8217; crossword puzzle).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dormouse</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189681</link>
		<dc:creator>Dormouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, very tough.  I was out this evening and didn&#039;t return to it until late.  By midnight, having made little further progress I resorted to word searches, especially on the more obvious anagrams.  Don&#039;t think I&#039;d have got many of the obscure ones otherwise, but with lots of e-help I was able to finish it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, very tough.  I was out this evening and didn&#8217;t return to it until late.  By midnight, having made little further progress I resorted to word searches, especially on the more obvious anagrams.  Don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d have got many of the obscure ones otherwise, but with lots of e-help I was able to finish it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertandjoyce</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189677</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertandjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phew! One of us has been working today so started this rather late. It was certainly more difficult than we expect from Phi. It was interesting to find out that he started with the obscure words - the very words we had difficulty with. We are obviously not alone!
However, all very fair and we managed to guess all the answers before using Chambers to check them. 
Thanks Phi and Duncan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew! One of us has been working today so started this rather late. It was certainly more difficult than we expect from Phi. It was interesting to find out that he started with the obscure words &#8211; the very words we had difficulty with. We are obviously not alone!<br />
However, all very fair and we managed to guess all the answers before using Chambers to check them.<br />
Thanks Phi and Duncan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterO</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189671</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, pressed the wrong key. For what it&#039;s worth, I think that 19D parses marginally better as

LIT (&#039;illuminated&#039;) + AN (&#039;article&#039;) + Y (&#039;unknown&#039;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, pressed the wrong key. For what it&#8217;s worth, I think that 19D parses marginally better as</p>
<p>LIT (&#8216;illuminated&#8217;) + AN (&#8216;article&#8217;) + Y (&#8216;unknown&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterO</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189670</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[14D would be known (to some anyway) from Molière&#039;s play &lt;em&gt;Le Médecin malgré lui&lt;/em&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14D would be known (to some anyway) from Molière&#8217;s play <em>Le Médecin malgré lui</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189667</link>
		<dc:creator>Phi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the odd word drawer will supply 2 or 3 at most (SUPER..., MYRMIDON here) and constraints may force others (AMI DU COUR). The drawer has words still in use (even if rarely) and which I think deserve an airing; constraints may not be so obliging!

Not sure I agree entirely re anagrams and obscurities, though I&#039;d acknowledge the awkward seesawing effect of not knowing which way the last pair of consonants or vowels fall in the unchecked letters.  But with something like SUPER... with its affixes, an anagram is extremely effective once you have a few crosschecks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the odd word drawer will supply 2 or 3 at most (SUPER&#8230;, MYRMIDON here) and constraints may force others (AMI DU COUR). The drawer has words still in use (even if rarely) and which I think deserve an airing; constraints may not be so obliging!</p>
<p>Not sure I agree entirely re anagrams and obscurities, though I&#8217;d acknowledge the awkward seesawing effect of not knowing which way the last pair of consonants or vowels fall in the unchecked letters.  But with something like SUPER&#8230; with its affixes, an anagram is extremely effective once you have a few crosschecks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189666</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evening Paul.  That would be significantly more naughty than just very naughty, then, I guess?  Actually, I&#039;m not sure I really agree: if I know it&#039;s an anagram, then once I&#039;ve got my crossing letters I can look for letter patterns; certain combinations are more likely than others, and usually by a process of elimination you can get there.  But I do agree with you that cryptics sometimes can be bloody annoying; but there is pleasure in overcoming annoyance sometimes, n&#039;est-ce pas?

Thanks to Duncan for elucidating MALGRÉ LUI for me and to Phi for dropping in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evening Paul.  That would be significantly more naughty than just very naughty, then, I guess?  Actually, I&#8217;m not sure I really agree: if I know it&#8217;s an anagram, then once I&#8217;ve got my crossing letters I can look for letter patterns; certain combinations are more likely than others, and usually by a process of elimination you can get there.  But I do agree with you that cryptics sometimes can be bloody annoying; but there is pleasure in overcoming annoyance sometimes, n&#8217;est-ce pas?</p>
<p>Thanks to Duncan for elucidating MALGRÉ LUI for me and to Phi for dropping in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189662</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good puzzle, but I think it very, very, very naughty to clue recondite words or phrases with anagrams. Because: even where solvers identify the solving events correctly, and even where they have all the crossing letters, they may not be able to arrive at the required word(s). And that, as I&#039;m sure some of us know, can be bloody annoying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good puzzle, but I think it very, very, very naughty to clue recondite words or phrases with anagrams. Because: even where solvers identify the solving events correctly, and even where they have all the crossing letters, they may not be able to arrive at the required word(s). And that, as I&#8217;m sure some of us know, can be bloody annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncanshiell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/04/13/independent-7955-phi/#comment-189633</link>
		<dc:creator>duncanshiell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=42857#comment-189633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phi @ 4

Thanks for commenting.  The second &#039;with&#039; in the clue at 16d was a typo on my part, but the version I was working from, downloaded on Crossword Solver nearly a week ago, did not have &#039;nitrogen&#039; in the clue.  I have a print of that version in front of me now.  

I note however hat the versions available on Crossword Solver today and the version in the on-line Independent paper both have the word &#039;nitrogen&#039; in the clue. I usually check that the version on Crossword Solver on the day of the puzzle is at least by the same compiler as the one I thought I was blogging, but I&#039;ll have to look at every clue in future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phi @ 4</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting.  The second &#8216;with&#8217; in the clue at 16d was a typo on my part, but the version I was working from, downloaded on Crossword Solver nearly a week ago, did not have &#8216;nitrogen&#8217; in the clue.  I have a print of that version in front of me now.  </p>
<p>I note however hat the versions available on Crossword Solver today and the version in the on-line Independent paper both have the word &#8216;nitrogen&#8217; in the clue. I usually check that the version on Crossword Solver on the day of the puzzle is at least by the same compiler as the one I thought I was blogging, but I&#8217;ll have to look at every clue in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
