<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian25,625 / Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192139</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 01:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the excellent blog (as usual).  I have to jump (hesitantly in such company) to Paul&#039;s defence on the grammar of 5ac.  Yes, &#039;you and I&#039; is incorrect as it stands, but &#039;you and me&#039; would have give the accusative first person plural pronoun, &#039;us&#039; instead of the required nominative &#039;we&#039; - so, having headed down that road, he had no choice.  I think it&#039;s forgivable.  Thanks, Paul.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent blog (as usual).  I have to jump (hesitantly in such company) to Paul&#8217;s defence on the grammar of 5ac.  Yes, &#8216;you and I&#8217; is incorrect as it stands, but &#8216;you and me&#8217; would have give the accusative first person plural pronoun, &#8216;us&#8217; instead of the required nominative &#8216;we&#8217; &#8211; so, having headed down that road, he had no choice.  I think it&#8217;s forgivable.  Thanks, Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192136</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes Paul is a parody of himself. I saw &quot;well oiled&quot; and inserted &quot;lubricated&quot; without even looking at the cryptic element.

&quot;Sea Slug&quot; is in quotes for the surface.

Found some of the surfaces a bit weak.

I really enjoyed it mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes Paul is a parody of himself. I saw &#8220;well oiled&#8221; and inserted &#8220;lubricated&#8221; without even looking at the cryptic element.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sea Slug&#8221; is in quotes for the surface.</p>
<p>Found some of the surfaces a bit weak.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed it mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Yap</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192129</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Yap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 22:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Life is not fair. This Paul puzzle is just my cup of tea and while solving it, was heard alternately tittering and guffawing ... truly a fun experience even though I should have been feeling miserable (lightning killed my modem-router the night because, probably as divine retribution for being grumpy about Boatman&#039;s puzzle)

Thank you, Paul for lifting my spirits ... I will lift a single malt with you when we meet. Thanks Eileen for the excellent blog - I truly envy you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life is not fair. This Paul puzzle is just my cup of tea and while solving it, was heard alternately tittering and guffawing &#8230; truly a fun experience even though I should have been feeling miserable (lightning killed my modem-router the night because, probably as divine retribution for being grumpy about Boatman&#8217;s puzzle)</p>
<p>Thank you, Paul for lifting my spirits &#8230; I will lift a single malt with you when we meet. Thanks Eileen for the excellent blog &#8211; I truly envy you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry - experiencing some submission problems: I kept getting &quot;duplicate comments&quot; message, so I thought I could clear it with a new &quot;Please Ignore&quot; message, by which time the original was posted!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; experiencing some submission problems: I kept getting &#8220;duplicate comments&#8221; message, so I thought I could clear it with a new &#8220;Please Ignore&#8221; message, by which time the original was posted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please ignore]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please ignore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192125</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(i) Why should (would) Paul  retaliate? 

(ii) I understood Xwords were often published weeks or months after submission - was there time for Paul to retaliate?

I also saw Alto and Tenor (and therefore SINGERS) straight away, but it took  an age to get BACKING.

What is Billy No Mates? (OK, I&#039;ll look it up).

I found it quite tough today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(i) Why should (would) Paul  retaliate? </p>
<p>(ii) I understood Xwords were often published weeks or months after submission &#8211; was there time for Paul to retaliate?</p>
<p>I also saw Alto and Tenor (and therefore SINGERS) straight away, but it took  an age to get BACKING.</p>
<p>What is Billy No Mates? (OK, I&#8217;ll look it up).</p>
<p>I found it quite tough today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FranTom Menace</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192120</link>
		<dc:creator>FranTom Menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a really enjoyable solve this was!  Can you believe we failed only on 16a with all other solutions in.  Suspected &#039;wedge&#039; but having &#039;wed&#039; as join and looking for &#039;GE&#039; to be a woman&#039;s club in order to get the definition &#039;bound&#039; got us thoroughly stuck.

Fran sussed it was &#039;tenor&#039; and &#039;alto&#039; backwards very quickly, and the solution came even faster once we sussed that.

Thanks Paul!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a really enjoyable solve this was!  Can you believe we failed only on 16a with all other solutions in.  Suspected &#8216;wedge&#8217; but having &#8216;wed&#8217; as join and looking for &#8216;GE&#8217; to be a woman&#8217;s club in order to get the definition &#8216;bound&#8217; got us thoroughly stuck.</p>
<p>Fran sussed it was &#8216;tenor&#8217; and &#8216;alto&#8217; backwards very quickly, and the solution came even faster once we sussed that.</p>
<p>Thanks Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192117</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An entertaining crossword that did raise some smiles (&#039;Whale meet again&#039;, indeed!), though no paroxysms of laughter.

I didn&#039;t like the grammar of the surface of the clue for 5ac - &#039;inspiring you and I&#039; made me wince.

Thank you Eileen, as always]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An entertaining crossword that did raise some smiles (&#8216;Whale meet again&#8217;, indeed!), though no paroxysms of laughter.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t like the grammar of the surface of the clue for 5ac &#8211; &#8216;inspiring you and I&#8217; made me wince.</p>
<p>Thank you Eileen, as always</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Paul as always, God awful grid design though. I dislike the first letters not being active.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Paul as always, God awful grid design though. I dislike the first letters not being active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trebor</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/02/guardian25625-paul/#comment-192100</link>
		<dc:creator>Trebor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=43652#comment-192100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good puzzle for the half hour commute. Paul can produce either very tricky or quite easy puzzles - his puzzles are of course good fun in any guise.
Which makes me think of the various difficulty standards we see in the Guardian. I seem to remember a suggestion that, as a matter of policy, certain days were consistently harder than others. Could anyone expand on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good puzzle for the half hour commute. Paul can produce either very tricky or quite easy puzzles &#8211; his puzzles are of course good fun in any guise.<br />
Which makes me think of the various difficulty standards we see in the Guardian. I seem to remember a suggestion that, as a matter of policy, certain days were consistently harder than others. Could anyone expand on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
