<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,641 &#8211; Brendan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brucew_aus</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-195660</link>
		<dc:creator>brucew_aus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-195660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Brendan and manehi.

Another very late blog - usually struggle with Brendan, not in duration, but getting a word wrong.  No problems with this one, although like others, I did take some time to work out what was going on with CRABBED which was my last in.

Enjoyed the theme which I twigged onto about half way through - didn&#039;t really help with getting any more answers, but did give another aha when spotting the fresh fruit.

BATH OLIVER which I hadn&#039;t seen before was my c.o.d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brendan and manehi.</p>
<p>Another very late blog &#8211; usually struggle with Brendan, not in duration, but getting a word wrong.  No problems with this one, although like others, I did take some time to work out what was going on with CRABBED which was my last in.</p>
<p>Enjoyed the theme which I twigged onto about half way through &#8211; didn&#8217;t really help with getting any more answers, but did give another aha when spotting the fresh fruit.</p>
<p>BATH OLIVER which I hadn&#8217;t seen before was my c.o.d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194330</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a lovely Monday &quot;substitute setter&quot; puzzle!  Difficulty just right, humor level perfect, theme fun without spoiling the hunt... and the grid I love to hate!  Who could ask for more?

I was even able to completely parse the two unfamiliar phrases at 6d and 13d before looking them up.

Thanks for the fine blog, Manehi, and the superfine Monday (Tuesday...) Treat, Brendan!

PS, I got a pocket-sized Collins &quot;crossword&quot; dictionary at the dump yesterday!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lovely Monday &#8220;substitute setter&#8221; puzzle!  Difficulty just right, humor level perfect, theme fun without spoiling the hunt&#8230; and the grid I love to hate!  Who could ask for more?</p>
<p>I was even able to completely parse the two unfamiliar phrases at 6d and 13d before looking them up.</p>
<p>Thanks for the fine blog, Manehi, and the superfine Monday (Tuesday&#8230;) Treat, Brendan!</p>
<p>PS, I got a pocket-sized Collins &#8220;crossword&#8221; dictionary at the dump yesterday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JollySwagman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194120</link>
		<dc:creator>JollySwagman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@RCW #33 - yes - that&#039;s good too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RCW #33 &#8211; yes &#8211; that&#8217;s good too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JollySwagman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194119</link>
		<dc:creator>JollySwagman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Brendan #32. Recanting like that, you would never make it in politics. As your self-appointed spin-doctor for 19D perhaps the explanation should be:

&quot;Makes&quot; can mean &quot;recoups&quot; on it&#039;s own. E.g. what did you recoup from that investment? 

That leaves &quot;up score&quot; as anagram fodder.

And &quot;originally composed&quot; taken together as the anagrind.

It comes from once having been a public &quot;servant&quot;.

&quot;Never complain, never explain, and never ever resign.&quot; - only sadly I did the first and last of those things.

Of course away from my duties as your spin-doctor I would say that the fact that &quot;makes up&quot; tightens the definition makes for what is sometimes called an extended definition - ie the short version is enough - the extended version (which appears to include double-duty) adds to it.

OTOH, personally, I see no reason at all for double-duty on the def/wordplay overlap to be perfectly allowable.

Thanks anyway for a characteristically enjoyable puzzle (and M for the blog).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brendan #32. Recanting like that, you would never make it in politics. As your self-appointed spin-doctor for 19D perhaps the explanation should be:</p>
<p>&#8220;Makes&#8221; can mean &#8220;recoups&#8221; on it&#8217;s own. E.g. what did you recoup from that investment? </p>
<p>That leaves &#8220;up score&#8221; as anagram fodder.</p>
<p>And &#8220;originally composed&#8221; taken together as the anagrind.</p>
<p>It comes from once having been a public &#8220;servant&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Never complain, never explain, and never ever resign.&#8221; &#8211; only sadly I did the first and last of those things.</p>
<p>Of course away from my duties as your spin-doctor I would say that the fact that &#8220;makes up&#8221; tightens the definition makes for what is sometimes called an extended definition &#8211; ie the short version is enough &#8211; the extended version (which appears to include double-duty) adds to it.</p>
<p>OTOH, personally, I see no reason at all for double-duty on the def/wordplay overlap to be perfectly allowable.</p>
<p>Thanks anyway for a characteristically enjoyable puzzle (and M for the blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194112</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not a purist so superfluous is OK by me.
I would have preferred just &quot;Makes up score.&quot; A very fine clue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a purist so superfluous is OK by me.<br />
I would have preferred just &#8220;Makes up score.&#8221; A very fine clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194103</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some comments on comments.

19 was a blunder. No excuse. The double duty of &quot;up&quot; inexcusable.
But I have no problem with &quot;originally&quot; (&quot;original&quot; = &quot;novel&quot;, see Chambers). Superfluous words, if they are justifiable, I see just as other possible resource for the cluer; likewise with 3-way clues.

Thanks Robi for saving my blushes on AEROBE, almost another blunder. My memory told me it was a small organism.

Nice one about Clinton and Monica, Robi. 

I hadn&#039;t heard of TABLE MONEY either, but sometimes a little stretching is acceptable for the sake of the theme, surely. It&#039;s in Chambers, its meaning can be inferred from its constituents, the clue is reasonably clear, and it has LEMON in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments on comments.</p>
<p>19 was a blunder. No excuse. The double duty of &#8220;up&#8221; inexcusable.<br />
But I have no problem with &#8220;originally&#8221; (&#8220;original&#8221; = &#8220;novel&#8221;, see Chambers). Superfluous words, if they are justifiable, I see just as other possible resource for the cluer; likewise with 3-way clues.</p>
<p>Thanks Robi for saving my blushes on AEROBE, almost another blunder. My memory told me it was a small organism.</p>
<p>Nice one about Clinton and Monica, Robi. </p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of TABLE MONEY either, but sometimes a little stretching is acceptable for the sake of the theme, surely. It&#8217;s in Chambers, its meaning can be inferred from its constituents, the clue is reasonably clear, and it has LEMON in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194096</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I said @16 &quot; I hate to be picky about individual clues (I usually resist)&quot;.
I wish I had stuck to my usual habit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said @16 &#8221; I hate to be picky about individual clues (I usually resist)&#8221;.<br />
I wish I had stuck to my usual habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194094</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NeilW @26; maybe this is stretching things, but could it be that &#039;makes&#039; is the anagrind and &#039;originally&#039; refers to &#039;makes up&#039; which is &#039;composed&#039; [or comprised]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NeilW @26; maybe this is stretching things, but could it be that &#8216;makes&#8217; is the anagrind and &#8216;originally&#8217; refers to &#8216;makes up&#8217; which is &#8216;composed&#8217; [or comprised]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apiarist</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194090</link>
		<dc:creator>apiarist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t finish this because at 15ac I was trying to solve it as note - poet and not poet - note. But even then I had never heard of &quot;crabbed&quot; so I doubt it would have made any difference . No sour grapes from me though !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t finish this because at 15ac I was trying to solve it as note &#8211; poet and not poet &#8211; note. But even then I had never heard of &#8220;crabbed&#8221; so I doubt it would have made any difference . No sour grapes from me though !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/21/guardian-25641-brendan/#comment-194088</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44434#comment-194088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The less talented amongst us struggled with this one. Intrigued at the lack of knowledge of the phrase TABLE MONEY. Um, you guys fancy a game of poker?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The less talented amongst us struggled with this one. Intrigued at the lack of knowledge of the phrase TABLE MONEY. Um, you guys fancy a game of poker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
