<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,002 by Cincinnus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/24/financial-times-14002-by-cincinnus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/24/financial-times-14002-by-cincinnus/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:41:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/24/financial-times-14002-by-cincinnus/#comment-194412</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44535#comment-194412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must confess I&#039;m not the first to use &amp;littish, having seen it somewhere on 15sq though I can&#039;t recall where.  You&#039;re right, &amp;lit and semi-&amp;lit very often trigger discussion, though personally I feel it doesn&#039;t really matter how one categorises a clue; just appreciate the ingenuity of the setter.  And that&#039;s why also I&#039;ve used WIWD to avoid further debate whether a clue is 100% &amp;lit or only part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess I&#8217;m not the first to use &amp;littish, having seen it somewhere on 15sq though I can&#8217;t recall where.  You&#8217;re right, &amp;lit and semi-&amp;lit very often trigger discussion, though personally I feel it doesn&#8217;t really matter how one categorises a clue; just appreciate the ingenuity of the setter.  And that&#8217;s why also I&#8217;ve used WIWD to avoid further debate whether a clue is 100% &amp;lit or only part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/24/financial-times-14002-by-cincinnus/#comment-194409</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44535#comment-194409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt; with the last two being superbly &amp;lit/&amp;littish (or wordplay intertwined with definition).

&quot;&amp;littish&quot; I like that!  Must remember it.  I have heard clues of this type referred to as semi-&amp;lits but there seems to be much disagreement about the term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; with the last two being superbly &amp;lit/&amp;littish (or wordplay intertwined with definition).</p>
<p>&#8220;&amp;littish&#8221; I like that!  Must remember it.  I have heard clues of this type referred to as semi-&amp;lits but there seems to be much disagreement about the term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/24/financial-times-14002-by-cincinnus/#comment-194408</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44535#comment-194408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Bob, after writing the initial blog in which I wondered aloud about &#039;once&#039;, it occurred to me what role that played and I amended the entry.  Earlier I had thought that Formosa was the name of the island while Taiwan was the name of the country but then I came to suspect I was wrong.  I looked it up on Wikipedia which confirmed that Formosa is an obsolete name for Taiwan.  (Given that I have visited Taiwan, I perhaps should have known anyway!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Bob, after writing the initial blog in which I wondered aloud about &#8216;once&#8217;, it occurred to me what role that played and I amended the entry.  Earlier I had thought that Formosa was the name of the island while Taiwan was the name of the country but then I came to suspect I was wrong.  I looked it up on Wikipedia which confirmed that Formosa is an obsolete name for Taiwan.  (Given that I have visited Taiwan, I perhaps should have known anyway!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Cumbow</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/24/financial-times-14002-by-cincinnus/#comment-194405</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cumbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44535#comment-194405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pete,

In your original post--which appears to have been amended above--you ssaid that in 21a the &quot;once&quot; seemed extraneous.It isn&#039;t, because Formosa was once the name of the island we now call Taiwan. Maybe you figured that out and that&#039;s why the archived post above contains a different comment for 21a. But I thought I&#039;d check in just in case. Thanks for all you do!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,</p>
<p>In your original post&#8211;which appears to have been amended above&#8211;you ssaid that in 21a the &#8220;once&#8221; seemed extraneous.It isn&#8217;t, because Formosa was once the name of the island we now call Taiwan. Maybe you figured that out and that&#8217;s why the archived post above contains a different comment for 21a. But I thought I&#8217;d check in just in case. Thanks for all you do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/05/24/financial-times-14002-by-cincinnus/#comment-194354</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=44535#comment-194354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Pete and Cincinnus.
Like you I found this an enjoyable prize puzzle, the 2 descriptions not always coming together.
Favourites were WELL I NEVER, FORMOSA and JILL, all with gems (to borrow your word) of a surface, with the last two being superbly &amp;lit/&amp;littish (or wordplay intertwined with definition).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Pete and Cincinnus.<br />
Like you I found this an enjoyable prize puzzle, the 2 descriptions not always coming together.<br />
Favourites were WELL I NEVER, FORMOSA and JILL, all with gems (to borrow your word) of a surface, with the last two being superbly &amp;lit/&amp;littish (or wordplay intertwined with definition).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
