<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,663 / Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brucew_aus</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-198616</link>
		<dc:creator>brucew_aus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-198616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Paul and Eileen

Didn&#039;t start this one to mid July and it took quite a few sittings to finally get it out.   Spent another week trying to work out why SPOONERISM fitted and finally gave up and came here to find out - hilarious !!

What a brilliant puzzle for a Friday and whilst seeing the royalty theme did not twig on to the chess one as much.

Great fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul and Eileen</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t start this one to mid July and it took quite a few sittings to finally get it out.   Spent another week trying to work out why SPOONERISM fitted and finally gave up and came here to find out &#8211; hilarious !!</p>
<p>What a brilliant puzzle for a Friday and whilst seeing the royalty theme did not twig on to the chess one as much.</p>
<p>Great fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodgel</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196150</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodgel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jackie, you&#039;re right!  And my old Chambers agrees with you.  One of those wandering words, I suppose.

A belated thanks to Eileen and all for explaining some fiendish cluing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackie, you&#8217;re right!  And my old Chambers agrees with you.  One of those wandering words, I suppose.</p>
<p>A belated thanks to Eileen and all for explaining some fiendish cluing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Holt</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Holt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bodgel, that was my understanding of prude too, but -

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/prude

- has the form used in the crossword as the first definition!

I&#039;m really glad to have found this blog as I could not work out the reason for 11a (Spoonerism), despite much head-scratching. Thanks Eileen for supplying the (hilarious!) answer.

And thanks too to Paul for creating a such a superb puzzle, I was thrilled to have completed it. It wasn&#039;t exactly a quick solve, but I enjoyed it immensely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bodgel, that was my understanding of prude too, but -</p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/prude" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/prude</a></p>
<p>- has the form used in the crossword as the first definition!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really glad to have found this blog as I could not work out the reason for 11a (Spoonerism), despite much head-scratching. Thanks Eileen for supplying the (hilarious!) answer.</p>
<p>And thanks too to Paul for creating a such a superb puzzle, I was thrilled to have completed it. It wasn&#8217;t exactly a quick solve, but I enjoyed it immensely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodgel</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196123</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodgel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see I have embarRassed myself further.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see I have embarRassed myself further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodgel</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196122</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodgel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely one of the 90% on this one - I got stuck at 11 right and one wrong (too embarassing to give details since it wasn&#039;t even spelt correctly, but it certainly didn&#039;t help with the rest).  But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just defensiveness that leads me to point out that a prude is someone who disapproves of someone else&#039;s behaviour, while a goody two shoes is someone who seeks approval by his or her own behaviour.  About as close in meaning as day and night, in fact?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely one of the 90% on this one &#8211; I got stuck at 11 right and one wrong (too embarassing to give details since it wasn&#8217;t even spelt correctly, but it certainly didn&#8217;t help with the rest).  But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just defensiveness that leads me to point out that a prude is someone who disapproves of someone else&#8217;s behaviour, while a goody two shoes is someone who seeks approval by his or her own behaviour.  About as close in meaning as day and night, in fact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r_c_a_d</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196119</link>
		<dc:creator>r_c_a_d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great puzzle. I don&#039;t often venture into the midweek crosswords but I might start doing the Friday ones now instead of the Saturdays (which have been a bit dull recently).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great puzzle. I don&#8217;t often venture into the midweek crosswords but I might start doing the Friday ones now instead of the Saturdays (which have been a bit dull recently).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196099</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 09:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came late to this one. Very little success on first visit but made rapid headway second time around. An excellent puzzle, ingenious and amusing: thanks to both Paul and Eileen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came late to this one. Very little success on first visit but made rapid headway second time around. An excellent puzzle, ingenious and amusing: thanks to both Paul and Eileen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196092</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe my brain wasn&#039;t working but I was one of the 90%]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe my brain wasn&#8217;t working but I was one of the 90%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhotician</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196075</link>
		<dc:creator>rhotician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul, Eileen, PaulB @25, RCW @28 and Thomas99 @32:

I began by solving 1ac which told me that 2dn began with M. I then, without really looking at 16, decided that the rest of the 2dn clue could only lead to &#039;monarch&#039; for which the solution to 16 must be the definition. Sure enough &#039;queen&#039; fitted the bill. The clue at 16 was therefore a simple Cryptic Definition, albeit, how shall I say, a bit feeble. Proceeding slowly and unsurely I completed the puzzle.

Turning to the blog I was gratified to see that the estimable Eileen seemed to agree about 16. &quot;But there must be more to it than that&quot; she said. Then looking at QUEEN on the screen the penny dropped. I scrolled forward to make a comment only to find that some foxy person had beaten me to it by some way.

Later it occurred to me that if I thought that 16 as a simple CD was a bit feeble then without &#039;in a group&#039; it just couldn&#039;t stand up. Hence my suggestion that &#039;group&#039; might be doing double duty (as the definition and as part of the CD).

Clearly my three respondents don&#039;t agree and I assume that Paul would deny it. Fair enough.

I agree with everyone on the general excellence of the puzzle. 11ac is superb. A definition by example and a CD, both very witty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, Eileen, PaulB @25, RCW @28 and Thomas99 @32:</p>
<p>I began by solving 1ac which told me that 2dn began with M. I then, without really looking at 16, decided that the rest of the 2dn clue could only lead to &#8216;monarch&#8217; for which the solution to 16 must be the definition. Sure enough &#8216;queen&#8217; fitted the bill. The clue at 16 was therefore a simple Cryptic Definition, albeit, how shall I say, a bit feeble. Proceeding slowly and unsurely I completed the puzzle.</p>
<p>Turning to the blog I was gratified to see that the estimable Eileen seemed to agree about 16. &#8220;But there must be more to it than that&#8221; she said. Then looking at QUEEN on the screen the penny dropped. I scrolled forward to make a comment only to find that some foxy person had beaten me to it by some way.</p>
<p>Later it occurred to me that if I thought that 16 as a simple CD was a bit feeble then without &#8216;in a group&#8217; it just couldn&#8217;t stand up. Hence my suggestion that &#8216;group&#8217; might be doing double duty (as the definition and as part of the CD).</p>
<p>Clearly my three respondents don&#8217;t agree and I assume that Paul would deny it. Fair enough.</p>
<p>I agree with everyone on the general excellence of the puzzle. 11ac is superb. A definition by example and a CD, both very witty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/06/15/guardian-25663-paul/#comment-196070</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=45414#comment-196070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rhotician @24-
No, &quot;group&quot; isn&#039;t doing double duty. It refers to Queen as a pop group, not to the queen as a card. The clue&#039;s a double definition; One of four cards = Queen and group = Queen. It took me a long time to solve, but it&#039;s a conventionally constructed clue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rhotician @24-<br />
No, &#8220;group&#8221; isn&#8217;t doing double duty. It refers to Queen as a pop group, not to the queen as a card. The clue&#8217;s a double definition; One of four cards = Queen and group = Queen. It took me a long time to solve, but it&#8217;s a conventionally constructed clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
