<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,051 &#8211; Falcon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/#comment-198738</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=46442#comment-198738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting point, Keeper.

Normally I would have done the puzzles you mentioned, but as I was abroad I restricted myself to the crossword I had to blog.

Personally, I cannot be bothered too much as long as it doesn&#039;t happen too frequently and as long as the clues are not too similar.

But just last week we had another duplication as Styx and Falcon both clued BLUDGEON, on two consecutive days.

And coincidentally, in this week&#039;s Guardian blogs there was a similar discussion due to the fact that both Qaos and Tramp made clear that they had to re-write one of their clues for this reason.

&quot;Isn’t it the editors’ job to try to avoid such repetition?&quot;
Good question, don&#039;t know the answer yet.
Editors could also try to change the order of publication of cryptics with duplications. At least, in that case, the setter&#039;s brainchild wouldn&#039;t be affected - which for me, personally, is more important than the negative effects i.e. a solver saying &quot;oh, I&#039;ve seen that one before&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point, Keeper.</p>
<p>Normally I would have done the puzzles you mentioned, but as I was abroad I restricted myself to the crossword I had to blog.</p>
<p>Personally, I cannot be bothered too much as long as it doesn&#8217;t happen too frequently and as long as the clues are not too similar.</p>
<p>But just last week we had another duplication as Styx and Falcon both clued BLUDGEON, on two consecutive days.</p>
<p>And coincidentally, in this week&#8217;s Guardian blogs there was a similar discussion due to the fact that both Qaos and Tramp made clear that they had to re-write one of their clues for this reason.</p>
<p>&#8220;Isn’t it the editors’ job to try to avoid such repetition?&#8221;<br />
Good question, don&#8217;t know the answer yet.<br />
Editors could also try to change the order of publication of cryptics with duplications. At least, in that case, the setter&#8217;s brainchild wouldn&#8217;t be affected &#8211; which for me, personally, is more important than the negative effects i.e. a solver saying &#8220;oh, I&#8217;ve seen that one before&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keeper</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/#comment-198728</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=46442#comment-198728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I surprised no one else has commented on the appearance of repeat answers (clued similarly) in consecutive FT puzzles.

14ac: In FT 14,052, Jason clued AFTER ALL as &quot;Last in spite of expectations.&quot;

27ac: In FT 14,050, Mudd clued MANDRAKE as &quot;Two males discovering plant.&quot;  What&#039;s more, the answer appeared in the same location in each grid (bottom left corner).

Isn&#039;t it the editors&#039; job to try to avoid such repetition?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I surprised no one else has commented on the appearance of repeat answers (clued similarly) in consecutive FT puzzles.</p>
<p>14ac: In FT 14,052, Jason clued AFTER ALL as &#8220;Last in spite of expectations.&#8221;</p>
<p>27ac: In FT 14,050, Mudd clued MANDRAKE as &#8220;Two males discovering plant.&#8221;  What&#8217;s more, the answer appeared in the same location in each grid (bottom left corner).</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it the editors&#8217; job to try to avoid such repetition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/#comment-198483</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=46442#comment-198483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments.

Richard, when I started blogging just over a year ago, I was aware of the big time span between publication and blog.
I thought, why not include a link to the puzzle in the first part of my preamble (of course, without giving anything away) to give solvers the opportunity to tackle the puzzle as if it were a daily before looking at the rest of the blog.

You are the first person to say something about this, which is much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
<p>Richard, when I started blogging just over a year ago, I was aware of the big time span between publication and blog.<br />
I thought, why not include a link to the puzzle in the first part of my preamble (of course, without giving anything away) to give solvers the opportunity to tackle the puzzle as if it were a daily before looking at the rest of the blog.</p>
<p>You are the first person to say something about this, which is much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/#comment-198471</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=46442#comment-198471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t get 25a and therefore I couldn&#039;t get 26a.
Not having 20d -I was convinced it was e something or other- was one reason why I couldn&#039;t get 25a 
Also failed on 18d where I was looking for a tall building but wouldn&#039;t have got tract either.
I have done easier FT crosswords than this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t get 25a and therefore I couldn&#8217;t get 26a.<br />
Not having 20d -I was convinced it was e something or other- was one reason why I couldn&#8217;t get 25a<br />
Also failed on 18d where I was looking for a tall building but wouldn&#8217;t have got tract either.<br />
I have done easier FT crosswords than this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/#comment-198424</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=46442#comment-198424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good of you to place a link to the crossword pdf in your itntroduction, by the way. Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good of you to place a link to the crossword pdf in your itntroduction, by the way. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/19/financial-times-14051-falcon/#comment-198415</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=46442#comment-198415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, Sil.

We found this an entertaining Monday lunchtime solve, although IMARI &amp; MERRIE ENGLAND were outside our general knowledge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, Sil.</p>
<p>We found this an entertaining Monday lunchtime solve, although IMARI &amp; MERRIE ENGLAND were outside our general knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
