<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic 663 / Moley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/30/guardian-quiptic-663-moley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/30/guardian-quiptic-663-moley/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/30/guardian-quiptic-663-moley/#comment-199541</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=47101#comment-199541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this hit the spot for a Quiptic - okay, there are a few overlapping clues/answers, but there were some nice constructions too.  I thought UNDER LOCK AND KEY was a nice anagram.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this hit the spot for a Quiptic &#8211; okay, there are a few overlapping clues/answers, but there were some nice constructions too.  I thought UNDER LOCK AND KEY was a nice anagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tallboss</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/30/guardian-quiptic-663-moley/#comment-199476</link>
		<dc:creator>Tallboss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 03:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=47101#comment-199476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this was a very fair quiptic, aimed at the right level a quiptic should be

Thanks to Moley and BD for the blog]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was a very fair quiptic, aimed at the right level a quiptic should be</p>
<p>Thanks to Moley and BD for the blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/30/guardian-quiptic-663-moley/#comment-199411</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=47101#comment-199411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree. Thanks for the blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. Thanks for the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/07/30/guardian-quiptic-663-moley/#comment-199407</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=47101#comment-199407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog Big Dave. Your final remarks take the words out of my mouth - I&#039;m not at all keen on the style of clue you describe, and this puzzle is so full of them that it almost looks like a deliberate &quot;theme&quot;. In the acrosses we also have (perhaps more obscurely than the examples you mention) deFENCE and the non-double definition of STIMULUS. (I also took 6dn as a very weak dd.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog Big Dave. Your final remarks take the words out of my mouth &#8211; I&#8217;m not at all keen on the style of clue you describe, and this puzzle is so full of them that it almost looks like a deliberate &#8220;theme&#8221;. In the acrosses we also have (perhaps more obscurely than the examples you mention) deFENCE and the non-double definition of STIMULUS. (I also took 6dn as a very weak dd.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
