<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AZED No. 2,099 Plain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/#comment-204366</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48151#comment-204366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Nick

Thank you for amending the entry for 6dn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick</p>
<p>Thank you for amending the entry for 6dn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/#comment-204362</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48151#comment-204362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forgot to mention 16ac, easy but lovely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to mention 16ac, easy but lovely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/#comment-204360</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48151#comment-204360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks all
Quite an easy Azed,I thought.
Last in was 34ac.
I agree that &#039;thebes&#039; is not the plural but I do think that &#039;thebe(s) will be worth many a one (pula) could be correct.
ie lots of thebe will be worth many pula.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all<br />
Quite an easy Azed,I thought.<br />
Last in was 34ac.<br />
I agree that &#8216;thebes&#8217; is not the plural but I do think that &#8216;thebe(s) will be worth many a one (pula) could be correct.<br />
ie lots of thebe will be worth many pula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sharkey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/#comment-204346</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sharkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 09:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48151#comment-204346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with all comments so far.  I use Azed&#039;s style of parsing and had 6d as simply &#039;anag. inc. o, o&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all comments so far.  I use Azed&#8217;s style of parsing and had 6d as simply &#8216;anag. inc. o, o&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/#comment-204343</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 08:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48151#comment-204343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Azed for the crossword and Nick for the blog.

6dn: I think this is ((m)O(b) (ab)O(ut) VALIANT)*. I cannot account for the &quot;about&quot; otherwise.

30dn: I agree with Richard@1 on both counts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Azed for the crossword and Nick for the blog.</p>
<p>6dn: I think this is ((m)O(b) (ab)O(ut) VALIANT)*. I cannot account for the &#8220;about&#8221; otherwise.</p>
<p>30dn: I agree with Richard@1 on both counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/#comment-204342</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 07:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48151#comment-204342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1d

&amp; lit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1d</p>
<p>&amp; lit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Heald</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/02/azed-no-2099-plain/#comment-204335</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Heald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 06:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48151#comment-204335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very unusual to see Azed make 2 factual inaccuracies in the same clue.  In 30Dn, &#039;thebes&#039; is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; the plural of thebe (see C), and a pula is worth many a thebe, not vice versa.

22Ac can be read as just a double definition, Nick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very unusual to see Azed make 2 factual inaccuracies in the same clue.  In 30Dn, &#8216;thebes&#8217; is <i>not</i> the plural of thebe (see C), and a pula is worth many a thebe, not vice versa.</p>
<p>22Ac can be read as just a double definition, Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
