<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25738 &#8211; Shed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:49:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205041</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From your page ref. xxii I assume you are using the 11th ed.
Interestingly on pg xvi section 7 of the latest it actually spells out the point. &quot;....strict alphabetical order may be waived in order to list the most commonly used form first.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From your page ref. xxii I assume you are using the 11th ed.<br />
Interestingly on pg xvi section 7 of the latest it actually spells out the point. &#8220;&#8230;.strict alphabetical order may be waived in order to list the most commonly used form first.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205037</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not rude at all - a little slow perhaps?
When examining B-L-A-I-E for my last to solve the correct word did not come to me because &#039;baulk&#039; does not fit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not rude at all &#8211; a little slow perhaps?<br />
When examining B-L-A-I-E for my last to solve the correct word did not come to me because &#8216;baulk&#8217; does not fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhotician</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205032</link>
		<dc:creator>rhotician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RCW @34
I was afraid someone would make such an observation.
Not long after making my post I found on pg xxii the example of &quot;alternative forms&quot; - boult or bolt. Opening at random and flicking around I soon found lots more. I assume you found ravin etc the same way.

I&#039;m still keen to understand how Chambers treats alternative forms but I&#039;ll keep the investigation private. Thanks for not subjecting my second sentence - &quot;In fact ... &quot; - to close scrutiny.

My curiosity was aroused by
yourself @12 - &quot;I have always spelled &#039;baulk&#039; but Chambers gives &#039;balk&#039; first.&quot; and
Giovanna @27 - &quot;although [Chambers] gives balk first.&quot;

Without wishing to be rude - so what?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RCW @34<br />
I was afraid someone would make such an observation.<br />
Not long after making my post I found on pg xxii the example of &#8220;alternative forms&#8221; &#8211; boult or bolt. Opening at random and flicking around I soon found lots more. I assume you found ravin etc the same way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still keen to understand how Chambers treats alternative forms but I&#8217;ll keep the investigation private. Thanks for not subjecting my second sentence &#8211; &#8220;In fact &#8230; &#8221; &#8211; to close scrutiny.</p>
<p>My curiosity was aroused by<br />
yourself @12 &#8211; &#8220;I have always spelled &#8216;baulk&#8217; but Chambers gives &#8216;balk&#8217; first.&#8221; and<br />
Giovanna @27 &#8211; &#8220;although [Chambers] gives balk first.&#8221;</p>
<p>Without wishing to be rude &#8211; so what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205029</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 22:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re 26 such indication is freely available and has been for megayonks. Some compilers even use it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 26 such indication is freely available and has been for megayonks. Some compilers even use it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205023</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rho @31
&quot;Chambers gives balk first because it precedes baulk alphabetically&quot;.
Are you sure? See: pg 1296 ravin, raven, ravine and passim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rho @31<br />
&#8220;Chambers gives balk first because it precedes baulk alphabetically&#8221;.<br />
Are you sure? See: pg 1296 ravin, raven, ravine and passim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gervase</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205019</link>
		<dc:creator>Gervase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi tupu: Thanks for correcting my mangling of Chomsky!

Shed: Thanks for dropping by - and for showing that setters are human after all.  As are solvers, of course - many of us failed to notice the infelicity.  Great puzzle, nevertheless!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi tupu: Thanks for correcting my mangling of Chomsky!</p>
<p>Shed: Thanks for dropping by &#8211; and for showing that setters are human after all.  As are solvers, of course &#8211; many of us failed to notice the infelicity.  Great puzzle, nevertheless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205018</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shed @30; thanks for dropping by; great minds think alike........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shed @30; thanks for dropping by; great minds think alike&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhotician</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205017</link>
		<dc:creator>rhotician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chambers gives balk first because it precedes baulk alphabetically. In fact by combining and cross-referencing the two it seems to me to imply that baulk is more common. Had I ever needed to write the word I  would have used baulk, having seen it more often. But I must have seen balk somewhere.

Nevertheless BALKANISE was also my last. And for what it&#039;s worth I also missed the misanagram.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chambers gives balk first because it precedes baulk alphabetically. In fact by combining and cross-referencing the two it seems to me to imply that baulk is more common. Had I ever needed to write the word I  would have used baulk, having seen it more often. But I must have seen balk somewhere.</p>
<p>Nevertheless BALKANISE was also my last. And for what it&#8217;s worth I also missed the misanagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shed</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205015</link>
		<dc:creator>Shed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Humble egg-faced apologies to all for 1dn and thanks for being so kind about it. I am in fact just about to contact the editor suggesting precisely Robi @14&#039;s rewrite (which I&#039;d thought of independently) for the archive. I take the point about a megabyte being a unit of memory rather than memory itself, but &#039;distance&#039; for &#039;mile&#039; is pretty standard and I think this falls into the same grey area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humble egg-faced apologies to all for 1dn and thanks for being so kind about it. I am in fact just about to contact the editor suggesting precisely Robi @14&#8242;s rewrite (which I&#8217;d thought of independently) for the archive. I take the point about a megabyte being a unit of memory rather than memory itself, but &#8216;distance&#8217; for &#8216;mile&#8217; is pretty standard and I think this falls into the same grey area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/11/guardian-25738-shed/#comment-205014</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ellison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48875#comment-205014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On second thoughts I suppose a BYTE is memory; still not convinced MEGABYTE is, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On second thoughts I suppose a BYTE is memory; still not convinced MEGABYTE is, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
