<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,098 by Cincinnus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205386</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well one of the senses of &#039;simple&#039; given in Chambers is &#039;a medicine having only one constituent&#039;, and at a stretch simple = unexciting, not really the same but possibly their meanings overlap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well one of the senses of &#8216;simple&#8217; given in Chambers is &#8216;a medicine having only one constituent&#8217;, and at a stretch simple = unexciting, not really the same but possibly their meanings overlap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205330</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wil, I cannot say that I see SIMPLE as fitting 26ac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wil, I cannot say that I see SIMPLE as fitting 26ac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205327</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lovely crossword as always from Cincinnus. I was a bit thrown by writing in SIMPLE for 26ac: it could be the answer, couldn&#039;t it? There were not at that stage any checkers so it went straight in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely crossword as always from Cincinnus. I was a bit thrown by writing in SIMPLE for 26ac: it could be the answer, couldn&#8217;t it? There were not at that stage any checkers so it went straight in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t imagine a commentator saying &quot;Australia is 20 for 4&quot; they would always say &quot;Australia are 20 for 4&quot; . Mind you I think Australians would say 4 (wickets down ) for 20 runs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine a commentator saying &#8220;Australia is 20 for 4&#8243; they would always say &#8220;Australia are 20 for 4&#8243; . Mind you I think Australians would say 4 (wickets down ) for 20 runs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205214</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, yes, interpreting 19D as Austin and Morris being both cars and men is better.  Thank you, dreadnought.  By the way, I once owned a car that was one of the two -- and I cannot remember which!

I think we will have to agree to disagree about 3D.  Americans find expressions such as &quot;Australia play test cricket&quot; to be odd and consider them wrong.  But I believe that Brits use such constructions commonly and consider them to be fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, interpreting 19D as Austin and Morris being both cars and men is better.  Thank you, dreadnought.  By the way, I once owned a car that was one of the two &#8212; and I cannot remember which!</p>
<p>I think we will have to agree to disagree about 3D.  Americans find expressions such as &#8220;Australia play test cricket&#8221; to be odd and consider them wrong.  But I believe that Brits use such constructions commonly and consider them to be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205209</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn;t get 1d,2d &amp; 10a which were all interlinked. Also failed on 17d even with ?t?e?s?d.

I&#039;m ok with Australia . The test match players (ie those playing in a test match) make up Australia.

I&#039;m afraid I don&#039;t follow the point being made in &quot;Australia is a singular noun so takes the third person singular conjugation of the verb “to be” which in turn must take a singular object.&quot; Sorry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn;t get 1d,2d &amp; 10a which were all interlinked. Also failed on 17d even with ?t?e?s?d.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m ok with Australia . The test match players (ie those playing in a test match) make up Australia.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I don&#8217;t follow the point being made in &#8220;Australia is a singular noun so takes the third person singular conjugation of the verb “to be” which in turn must take a singular object.&#8221; Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205178</link>
		<dc:creator>John Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Pete and Cincinnus for yet another excellent puzzle.
I can&#039;t resist putting in my bit as an Australian to say that 3D is in error.  It should definitely read PLAYER.  I don&#039;t recall ever seeing Cincinnus make a mistake before so it is a huge surprise.  Australia is a singular noun so takes the third person singular conjugation of the verb &quot;to be&quot; which in turn must take a singular object.
Interestingly, in my work my country is always being muddled with Austria so I should have solved this clue immediately but sadly must confess to taking a little while.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pete and Cincinnus for yet another excellent puzzle.<br />
I can&#8217;t resist putting in my bit as an Australian to say that 3D is in error.  It should definitely read PLAYER.  I don&#8217;t recall ever seeing Cincinnus make a mistake before so it is a huge surprise.  Australia is a singular noun so takes the third person singular conjugation of the verb &#8220;to be&#8221; which in turn must take a singular object.<br />
Interestingly, in my work my country is always being muddled with Austria so I should have solved this clue immediately but sadly must confess to taking a little while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205174</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 12:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks, Pete &amp; Cincinnus.

I opted for PEDALO @ 1d but left a note for myself: &#039;Is 1d Correct?&#039;

It was and now that I know why maybe I will be able to sleep again at nights?

And here&#039;s a link for William Morris otherwise Lord Nuffield:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Morris,_1st_Viscount_Nuffield]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks, Pete &amp; Cincinnus.</p>
<p>I opted for PEDALO @ 1d but left a note for myself: &#8216;Is 1d Correct?&#8217;</p>
<p>It was and now that I know why maybe I will be able to sleep again at nights?</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a link for William Morris otherwise Lord Nuffield:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Morris,_1st_Viscount_Nuffield" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Morris,_1st_Viscount_Nuffield</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreadnought</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/13/financial-times-14098-by-cincinnus/#comment-205140</link>
		<dc:creator>dreadnought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=48802#comment-205140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes I enjoyed this too, especially the Aston Martin fodder.

19d: I think both Austin and Morris are both cars and both men, so &#039;carmen&#039; works OK.

Thanks for blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I enjoyed this too, especially the Aston Martin fodder.</p>
<p>19d: I think both Austin and Morris are both cars and both men, so &#8216;carmen&#8217; works OK.</p>
<p>Thanks for blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
