<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Cryptic N° 25,741 by Gordius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: g larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205354</link>
		<dc:creator>g larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 09:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting idea, Mr DNA @22, but I think it only works if your bracketed &#039;in&#039; is included, which it wasn&#039;t. Even then it&#039;s not a fair definition. I&#039;m with PeterO on this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea, Mr DNA @22, but I think it only works if your bracketed &#8216;in&#8217; is included, which it wasn&#8217;t. Even then it&#8217;s not a fair definition. I&#8217;m with PeterO on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr DNA</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr DNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could be argued that the definition of 1D isn’t necessarily the whole clue, as PeterO has it, but is just ‘around [in] 2061?’. So ‘around’ in the sense of ‘present, in evidence’ rather than ‘approximately’.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be argued that the definition of 1D isn’t necessarily the whole clue, as PeterO has it, but is just ‘around [in] 2061?’. So ‘around’ in the sense of ‘present, in evidence’ rather than ‘approximately’.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205333</link>
		<dc:creator>g larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I quibbled at 1d -&#039;around 2061&#039;. Presumably we, or at least the astronomers among us, know that Halley&#039;s Comet will appear in that year, not around it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quibbled at 1d -&#8217;around 2061&#8242;. Presumably we, or at least the astronomers among us, know that Halley&#8217;s Comet will appear in that year, not around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205325</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got off to a very bad start when I Googled 2061 and opted to put Odyssey Three in for 1d.  Fortunately, I didn&#039;t come up with any suitable answers for a 1,8, 10, 12, 17, and 19a to aggravate the situation before I returned to Wikipedia and found there was a better answer for 1d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got off to a very bad start when I Googled 2061 and opted to put Odyssey Three in for 1d.  Fortunately, I didn&#8217;t come up with any suitable answers for a 1,8, 10, 12, 17, and 19a to aggravate the situation before I returned to Wikipedia and found there was a better answer for 1d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205323</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cross-dressed here too. chafing. don&#039;t know how the ladies deal with all these straps &amp; bits of elastic...

d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cross-dressed here too. chafing. don&#8217;t know how the ladies deal with all these straps &amp; bits of elastic&#8230;</p>
<p>d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muffin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205315</link>
		<dc:creator>muffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MMLXI is written in my working space too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MMLXI is written in my working space too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chas</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205306</link>
		<dc:creator>chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to PeterO for the blog.

I also had CROSS-DRESSED. The number of us taking that view says to me that the clue needed better writing.

On 1d: when I see a date-like number in a clue I always check what it would look like in Roman numerals. On this occasion I got MMLXI which looked extremely unpromising!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to PeterO for the blog.</p>
<p>I also had CROSS-DRESSED. The number of us taking that view says to me that the clue needed better writing.</p>
<p>On 1d: when I see a date-like number in a clue I always check what it would look like in Roman numerals. On this occasion I got MMLXI which looked extremely unpromising!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205305</link>
		<dc:creator>rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, not too keen on that, which seemed a bit of a mess. &#039;Was&#039; is not used except for the &#039;surface&#039; meaning, and &#039;in&#039; has to be a verb, I guess, to &#039;in&#039; the &#039;break of jail&#039;. Wow, not my favourite clue!

Thanks KenJ
Rowly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, not too keen on that, which seemed a bit of a mess. &#8216;Was&#8217; is not used except for the &#8216;surface&#8217; meaning, and &#8216;in&#8217; has to be a verb, I guess, to &#8216;in&#8217; the &#8216;break of jail&#8217;. Wow, not my favourite clue!</p>
<p>Thanks KenJ<br />
Rowly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenj</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205302</link>
		<dc:creator>kenj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re 19ac
I think &#039;involved&#039; and &#039;....break&#039; are anagrinds for an anagram of he and jail.
Definition is &#039;he was .... in biblical times&#039;.
Nothing to do with jailbreaks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re 19ac<br />
I think &#8216;involved&#8217; and &#8216;&#8230;.break&#8217; are anagrinds for an anagram of he and jail.<br />
Definition is &#8216;he was &#8230;. in biblical times&#8217;.<br />
Nothing to do with jailbreaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/14/guardian-cryptic-n-25741-by-gordius/#comment-205294</link>
		<dc:creator>rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49006#comment-205294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too had CROSS-DRESSED! So with a good few of us thwarted there, it must be a bad one. That CHASUBLE one I didn&#039;t really like &#039;adjusts&#039;, maybe adjusted would have been better. And it&#039;s a bit chestnutty, I think I&#039;ve seen that version, kind of, quite few times. Rest okay, not too terrible.

Thanks for a nice blog, and to setter,

Cheers,
Rowly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too had CROSS-DRESSED! So with a good few of us thwarted there, it must be a bad one. That CHASUBLE one I didn&#8217;t really like &#8216;adjusts&#8217;, maybe adjusted would have been better. And it&#8217;s a bit chestnutty, I think I&#8217;ve seen that version, kind of, quite few times. Rest okay, not too terrible.</p>
<p>Thanks for a nice blog, and to setter,</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rowly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
