Comments on: Cyclops 477: Our Slicker http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/16/cyclops-477-our-slicker/ Never knowingly undersolved. Wed, 22 May 2013 22:30:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Bamberger http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/16/cyclops-477-our-slicker/#comment-205784 Bamberger Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:32:55 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49059#comment-205784 I liked your intro because while this didn’t cause me any problems, I find it really irritating when a blogger on a xword says something like “Very easy with no hold ups” and I’ve struggled for 45 minutes and have been quite pleased to get 5 clues out.

]]> By: jetdoc http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/16/cyclops-477-our-slicker/#comment-205703 jetdoc Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:23:27 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49059#comment-205703 Thanks, Will

]]> By: Will http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/16/cyclops-477-our-slicker/#comment-205624 Will Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:16:47 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49059#comment-205624 Slight correction to 2d: AN = one.

]]> By: jetdoc http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/16/cyclops-477-our-slicker/#comment-205450 jetdoc Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:46:50 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49059#comment-205450 Maybe… I wasn’t especially struck by the filthiness of it, but I am pretty much inured to it by now!

Beermagnet and I agree that the most difficult thing about writing the blog is doing the introductory paragraph, which was particularly difficult with this one — I just couldn’t think of anything to say!

]]> By: bridgesong http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/16/cyclops-477-our-slicker/#comment-205446 bridgesong Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:33:12 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49059#comment-205446 Thanks for the blog, Jetdoc. I agree with your assessment of the level of difficulty, although NORK was new to me. However, was it not even filthier than usual?

]]>