<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,744 &#8211; Tramp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ste</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-206070</link>
		<dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-206070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent themed puzzle which was a pleasure from start to nearly the finish. Jessie instead of Barbie caused me problems - found Jess hooks existed so was sure this was correct. Fave clue TOYNBEE ( also a fave journo)
Thanks again Tramp
;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent themed puzzle which was a pleasure from start to nearly the finish. Jessie instead of Barbie caused me problems &#8211; found Jess hooks existed so was sure this was correct. Fave clue TOYNBEE ( also a fave journo)<br />
Thanks again Tramp<br />
 <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205653</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No problem there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artie Fufkin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205646</link>
		<dc:creator>Artie Fufkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been working on this over 2 days and just finished with a couple of gaps (i&#039;m a relative beginner). Great stuff as ever from Tramp, I must be on his wavelength as his are consistently the ones at which I do best. And looks like I need a new moniker as there&#039;s another Mr Fufkin :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been working on this over 2 days and just finished with a couple of gaps (i&#8217;m a relative beginner). Great stuff as ever from Tramp, I must be on his wavelength as his are consistently the ones at which I do best. And looks like I need a new moniker as there&#8217;s another Mr Fufkin <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205625</link>
		<dc:creator>rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toy Story would be for the VERY young though, Rorshach? But I still like the clever way you pin down the inconsistencies we see. 

On Sil, Paul B and Davy I think someone was having a bit of a chuckle, which is fine by me. I&#039;m a Times lover, but I think it&#039;s good to do the other titles as well, just to keep the hand in. 

Many thanks all. Enjoyed this thread.

Cheers
Rowly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toy Story would be for the VERY young though, Rorshach? But I still like the clever way you pin down the inconsistencies we see. </p>
<p>On Sil, Paul B and Davy I think someone was having a bit of a chuckle, which is fine by me. I&#8217;m a Times lover, but I think it&#8217;s good to do the other titles as well, just to keep the hand in. </p>
<p>Many thanks all. Enjoyed this thread.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Rowly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205614</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rorschach @ 65:

Any way this blog can incorporate a &#039;Like&#039; button?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rorschach @ 65:</p>
<p>Any way this blog can incorporate a &#8216;Like&#8217; button?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205611</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@57,58
Thanks for the publicity, gents.
&quot;Brusque&quot; but never rude. A style worth cultivating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@57,58<br />
Thanks for the publicity, gents.<br />
&#8220;Brusque&#8221; but never rude. A style worth cultivating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rorschach</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205603</link>
		<dc:creator>Rorschach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The perennial paradox of crossword solvers:

1 - why don&#039;t more young people do crosswords?

2 - Toy Story?!?! What is this?!?! Bloody setter!?!?!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The perennial paradox of crossword solvers:</p>
<p>1 &#8211; why don&#8217;t more young people do crosswords?</p>
<p>2 &#8211; Toy Story?!?! What is this?!?! Bloody setter!?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205601</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul B (@58) and Davy (@62): leaving out &#039;to&#039; was just a typo, no bad intentions whatsoever.

Paul B: I must admit I do Times crosswords only occasionally. Despite the fact that they are very precise and often clever, it is the house style (in my opinion, leading to somewhat sterile surfaces) that does not appeal very much to me. 

In my perception there is a lot more going on during an average Guardian crossword week. Not just in a positive way, there is much to criticise too. However, in general, I find the mixture of styles quite attractive. 
Perhaps, that&#039;s what I meant with &#039;adventurous&#039; - it&#039;s more an overall feeling than just about the clueing itself (which in case of The Times is undoubtedly first-class from a technical POV).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul B (@58) and Davy (@62): leaving out &#8216;to&#8217; was just a typo, no bad intentions whatsoever.</p>
<p>Paul B: I must admit I do Times crosswords only occasionally. Despite the fact that they are very precise and often clever, it is the house style (in my opinion, leading to somewhat sterile surfaces) that does not appeal very much to me. </p>
<p>In my perception there is a lot more going on during an average Guardian crossword week. Not just in a positive way, there is much to criticise too. However, in general, I find the mixture of styles quite attractive.<br />
Perhaps, that&#8217;s what I meant with &#8216;adventurous&#8217; &#8211; it&#8217;s more an overall feeling than just about the clueing itself (which in case of The Times is undoubtedly first-class from a technical POV).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205597</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please pardon the double &#039;m&#039;. Don&#039;t know where the second one came from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please pardon the double &#8216;m&#8217;. Don&#8217;t know where the second one came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/18/guardian-25744-tramp/#comment-205594</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49105#comment-205594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re Sil&#039;s comment at 57, methinks there is a missing &#039;to&#039; in the penultimmate line. Should read &#039;please stick to&#039;
but its amazing how the omission of one simple word can give a completely different meaning. Perhaps it was intentional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Sil&#8217;s comment at 57, methinks there is a missing &#8216;to&#8217; in the penultimmate line. Should read &#8216;please stick to&#8217;<br />
but its amazing how the omission of one simple word can give a completely different meaning. Perhaps it was intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
