<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,121 by Alberich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206618</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, due to a new job, I have somewhat less time to do more than one cryptic nowadays. For that reason, I decided to start each day (ie before having a shower and, after that, while having my breakfast) with one of the non-Guardian puzzles. That is, if time allows.

Flimsy&#039;s very neat Thursday crossword was an easy victim, but Alberich&#039;s offering left me with only 5 solutions before I went to work. 
So, this morning, I gave it a follow-up.
This time I was more successful, although some words were unknown to me (ADIT, ANOSMIC, KISHINEV), but luckily clearly signposted.

I think we all agree that this was once more a beauty.
Indeed, a beauty!

Many thanks to everyone involved (slogger and better)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, due to a new job, I have somewhat less time to do more than one cryptic nowadays. For that reason, I decided to start each day (ie before having a shower and, after that, while having my breakfast) with one of the non-Guardian puzzles. That is, if time allows.</p>
<p>Flimsy&#8217;s very neat Thursday crossword was an easy victim, but Alberich&#8217;s offering left me with only 5 solutions before I went to work.<br />
So, this morning, I gave it a follow-up.<br />
This time I was more successful, although some words were unknown to me (ADIT, ANOSMIC, KISHINEV), but luckily clearly signposted.</p>
<p>I think we all agree that this was once more a beauty.<br />
Indeed, a beauty!</p>
<p>Many thanks to everyone involved (slogger and better)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206580</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Jed for the recommendation, I saw your summary on the 152 home page so decided to give it a go, very pleased I did! 

Thanks too for explaining KISHINEV, I thought of kiev, but coulnd&#039;t make any likely sounding answers from that.  Having seen the solution I&#039;m not sure that I would have thought it promising enough to look up anyway!

Thanks to Alberich too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jed for the recommendation, I saw your summary on the 152 home page so decided to give it a go, very pleased I did! </p>
<p>Thanks too for explaining KISHINEV, I thought of kiev, but coulnd&#8217;t make any likely sounding answers from that.  Having seen the solution I&#8217;m not sure that I would have thought it promising enough to look up anyway!</p>
<p>Thanks to Alberich too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206499</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great stuff from the old boy (see Anax a few days ago), found this a pig to complete so thanks Jed for explaining some bits I just couldn&#039;t see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff from the old boy (see Anax a few days ago), found this a pig to complete so thanks Jed for explaining some bits I just couldn&#8217;t see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206492</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Alberich @4. I am completely happy to be put right about 20ac. It works perfectly if the omission is made before the anagram and I really should have seen that. I think it works equally well on both surface and cryptic reading with or without the &quot;off&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alberich @4. I am completely happy to be put right about 20ac. It works perfectly if the omission is made before the anagram and I really should have seen that. I think it works equally well on both surface and cryptic reading with or without the &#8220;off&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberich</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206489</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m off out soon so an early thanks for the blog and comments so far. 20 is meant to imply that &quot;ring off&quot; from mountaineer, i.e. MUNTAINEER, is mobile, and the rest is definition. I think that does work though I can&#039;t for the life of me remember why I felt it necessary to include the &quot;off&quot;. A good weekend to all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m off out soon so an early thanks for the blog and comments so far. 20 is meant to imply that &#8220;ring off&#8221; from mountaineer, i.e. MUNTAINEER, is mobile, and the rest is definition. I think that does work though I can&#8217;t for the life of me remember why I felt it necessary to include the &#8220;off&#8221;. A good weekend to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206487</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction to 2 re 20ac: &quot;I cannot quite &lt;i&gt;get&lt;/i&gt; the cryptic grammar&quot; etc. I cannot get the grammar to work correctly in my own comment otherwise. Apologies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to 2 re 20ac: &#8220;I cannot quite <i>get</i> the cryptic grammar&#8221; etc. I cannot get the grammar to work correctly in my own comment otherwise. Apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206486</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Alberich for a very enjoyable puzzle and Jed for the blog. As Eileen, has already said, large numbers of excellent clues. My favourite was 8dn.

20ac: I cannot quite the cryptic grammar to work in this one. I would be happy with either &quot;mountaineer mobile&quot; (noun phrase) or &quot;mountaineer&#039;s mobile&quot; (complete clause) as an indication for the anagram, but to me &quot;Ring off from&quot; only works with the former.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alberich for a very enjoyable puzzle and Jed for the blog. As Eileen, has already said, large numbers of excellent clues. My favourite was 8dn.</p>
<p>20ac: I cannot quite the cryptic grammar to work in this one. I would be happy with either &#8220;mountaineer mobile&#8221; (noun phrase) or &#8220;mountaineer&#8217;s mobile&#8221; (complete clause) as an indication for the anagram, but to me &#8220;Ring off from&#8221; only works with the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/09/28/financial-times-14121-by-alberich/#comment-206470</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49475#comment-206470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Jed. 

A smasher indeed - it would be much quicker to list the clues that I didn&#039;t tick!

Some stunningly good constructions and surfaces, notably 20, 24,26,27 [as a former teacher, I really laughed at this one] ac and 2,7,8,9,17, and 21 dn. [I could go on!]

Huge thanks, Alberich - I loved it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jed. </p>
<p>A smasher indeed &#8211; it would be much quicker to list the clues that I didn&#8217;t tick!</p>
<p>Some stunningly good constructions and surfaces, notably 20, 24,26,27 [as a former teacher, I really laughed at this one] ac and 2,7,8,9,17, and 21 dn. [I could go on!]</p>
<p>Huge thanks, Alberich &#8211; I loved it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
