<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 8111 / Phi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208864</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Phi for dropping in. The &quot;beepiarist&quot; is indeed from &lt;i&gt;Garden Rubbish&lt;/i&gt;: one of the few gems in a book which I found rather tedious overall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phi for dropping in. The &#8220;beepiarist&#8221; is indeed from <i>Garden Rubbish</i>: one of the few gems in a book which I found rather tedious overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dormouse</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208862</link>
		<dc:creator>Dormouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I thought I&#039;d done this, but I now see I got 23ac wrong.  I was thinking along the lines that as a pianist gives a recital, they could be a &quot;reciter&quot;, but of course the correct noun would be &quot;recitalist&quot;.  OK, I couldn&#039;t see how it worked but I couldn&#039;t see 24ac either.  (I see Richter kept playing into the nineties, but I don&#039;t recall ever seeing him play.)

Thanks, and thanks for being not the only one having &quot;Tripoli&quot; for 17ac.  Came back to the puzzle after several hours and suddenly saw 6dn, which told me I was wrong.  I&#039;d been previously telling myself there could be no word starting tb-.

No, I didn&#039;t spot the nina.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I thought I&#8217;d done this, but I now see I got 23ac wrong.  I was thinking along the lines that as a pianist gives a recital, they could be a &#8220;reciter&#8221;, but of course the correct noun would be &#8220;recitalist&#8221;.  OK, I couldn&#8217;t see how it worked but I couldn&#8217;t see 24ac either.  (I see Richter kept playing into the nineties, but I don&#8217;t recall ever seeing him play.)</p>
<p>Thanks, and thanks for being not the only one having &#8220;Tripoli&#8221; for 17ac.  Came back to the puzzle after several hours and suddenly saw 6dn, which told me I was wrong.  I&#8217;d been previously telling myself there could be no word starting tb-.</p>
<p>No, I didn&#8217;t spot the nina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208844</link>
		<dc:creator>Phi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My notes (from when I typed up the puzzle to submit it) say &#039;mo&#039;.

The bee -&gt; apiarist &amp; ape -&gt; beepiarist is rather neat.  I don&#039;t recognise it, but I must admit I tired of S&amp;Y after &#039;And Now All This&#039;.  There was one called &#039;Garden Rubbish&#039;, I think, and it may come from that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My notes (from when I typed up the puzzle to submit it) say &#8216;mo&#8217;.</p>
<p>The bee -&gt; apiarist &amp; ape -&gt; beepiarist is rather neat.  I don&#8217;t recognise it, but I must admit I tired of S&amp;Y after &#8216;And Now All This&#8217;.  There was one called &#8216;Garden Rubbish&#8217;, I think, and it may come from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertandjoyce</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208840</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertandjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well spotted - we missed that entirely. Perhaps Phi will drop by and indicate which one he intended.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well spotted &#8211; we missed that entirely. Perhaps Phi will drop by and indicate which one he intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208836</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to 4/5 and 8: &lt;i&gt;Chambers&lt;/i&gt; 2008 and 2011 (but not 1998) have &lt;b&gt;mo.&lt;/b&gt; for &quot;month&quot; in a separate entry some way down from &lt;b&gt;MO&lt;/b&gt;, which has various expansions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to 4/5 and 8: <i>Chambers</i> 2008 and 2011 (but not 1998) have <b>mo.</b> for &#8220;month&#8221; in a separate entry some way down from <b>MO</b>, which has various expansions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan_c</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208833</link>
		<dc:creator>allan_c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bah! Missed the nina, otherwise I might have got TAUT a lot sooner than I did.  And I too had to check the meaning of &#039;gore&#039;; I always wondered why Kensington Gore was so called.

Thanks, Phi and B&amp;J.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah! Missed the nina, otherwise I might have got TAUT a lot sooner than I did.  And I too had to check the meaning of &#8216;gore&#8217;; I always wondered why Kensington Gore was so called.</p>
<p>Thanks, Phi and B&amp;J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertandjoyce</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208807</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertandjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelham Barton @5 -  We thought the same thing about 20d. It wasn&#039;t until we came to write up the blog that we realised we couldn&#039;t find MO as an abbreviation for month in any of the dictionaries!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelham Barton @5 &#8211;  We thought the same thing about 20d. It wasn&#8217;t until we came to write up the blog that we realised we couldn&#8217;t find MO as an abbreviation for month in any of the dictionaries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208800</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10a seems uncontroversial to me. NealH is right that &quot;net game&quot; wouldn&#039;t be used to describe a player&#039;s overall performance, but there is nothing in the clue to suggest that it would. My understanding is that it means how a player (or seed) plays (or performs) close to the net - which fits Phi&#039;s clue very well. I think it is a common expression. (I don&#039;t know much about tennis  but I certainly knew it.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10a seems uncontroversial to me. NealH is right that &#8220;net game&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t be used to describe a player&#8217;s overall performance, but there is nothing in the clue to suggest that it would. My understanding is that it means how a player (or seed) plays (or performs) close to the net &#8211; which fits Phi&#8217;s clue very well. I think it is a common expression. (I don&#8217;t know much about tennis  but I certainly knew it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208790</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a bit puzzled by 10 across and refused to believe it was the right answer for a long time.  I can see that a tennis player might be described as having a good &quot;net game&quot;, meaning they are good at volleying close to the net, but it hardly seems like common usage and I don&#039;t think you would use it to describe a player&#039;s overall performance.  Other than that, this was an enjoyable and well-constructed puzzle.  Spotting the NINA would have helped me with the couple I was struggling with (derivative and taut), but I didn&#039;t notice it.   The definition in 4 down was excellent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit puzzled by 10 across and refused to believe it was the right answer for a long time.  I can see that a tennis player might be described as having a good &#8220;net game&#8221;, meaning they are good at volleying close to the net, but it hardly seems like common usage and I don&#8217;t think you would use it to describe a player&#8217;s overall performance.  Other than that, this was an enjoyable and well-constructed puzzle.  Spotting the NINA would have helped me with the couple I was struggling with (derivative and taut), but I didn&#8217;t notice it.   The definition in 4 down was excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/12/independent-8111-phi/#comment-208787</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=49951#comment-208787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction to 4: I meant 20dn, not 22dn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to 4: I meant 20dn, not 22dn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
