<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic 675 Nutmeg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:08:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosser</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/#comment-211168</link>
		<dc:creator>crosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50455#comment-211168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only just got round to this puzzle. Thanks scchua.
I agree with Derek @5 about the difficulty but I really loved the misdirection at 5d (silk underwear) and at 7d (office worker = tea lady)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only just got round to this puzzle. Thanks scchua.<br />
I agree with Derek @5 about the difficulty but I really loved the misdirection at 5d (silk underwear) and at 7d (office worker = tea lady)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/#comment-210631</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50455#comment-210631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well to someone who is closer to the target audience than most, I found this harder than Rufus, and that was rated by most as being hard for a Rufus. So a bit strong for a Quiptic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to someone who is closer to the target audience than most, I found this harder than Rufus, and that was rated by most as being hard for a Rufus. So a bit strong for a Quiptic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/#comment-210532</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50455#comment-210532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re probably right, Jolly Swagman.  I was perhaps trying too hard in reading more into the clue.
[[Robi, right as usual.  #3 is furniture in the French Provincial style.]]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably right, Jolly Swagman.  I was perhaps trying too hard in reading more into the clue.<br />
[[Robi, right as usual.  #3 is furniture in the French Provincial style.]]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/#comment-210503</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50455#comment-210503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Largely good; thanks scchua - I did like LOVE LETTER, but not keen on LLANELLI.

[[#1 is the Big Dipper; alias Ursa Major
  #2 is Pat Boone - LOVE LETTERs In The Sand
  #3 is a French (PROVINCIAL?) dresser]]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Largely good; thanks scchua &#8211; I did like LOVE LETTER, but not keen on LLANELLI.</p>
<p>[[#1 is the Big Dipper; alias Ursa Major<br />
  #2 is Pat Boone - LOVE LETTERs In The Sand<br />
  #3 is a French (PROVINCIAL?) dresser]]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JollySwagman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/#comment-210478</link>
		<dc:creator>JollySwagman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50455#comment-210478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction - it doesn&#039;t quite work as a triple because briefs is plural and silk is singular - but the fact that it nearly does is still neat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t quite work as a triple because briefs is plural and silk is singular &#8211; but the fact that it nearly does is still neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JollySwagman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/22/guardian-quiptic-675-nutmeg/#comment-210475</link>
		<dc:creator>JollySwagman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50455#comment-210475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice - thanks both.

Particularly liked 5d - I didn&#039;t read it as a triple as &quot;cases for silks&quot; gives briefs without resorting to slang. The triple reading is good too which makes it even better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice &#8211; thanks both.</p>
<p>Particularly liked 5d &#8211; I didn&#8217;t read it as a triple as &#8220;cases for silks&#8221; gives briefs without resorting to slang. The triple reading is good too which makes it even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
