<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,143 by Cinephile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/24/financial-times-14143-by-cinephile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/24/financial-times-14143-by-cinephile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/24/financial-times-14143-by-cinephile/#comment-210888</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50572#comment-210888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the pointing out the omission Eileen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pointing out the omission Eileen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/24/financial-times-14143-by-cinephile/#comment-210882</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50572#comment-210882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for being an EARLY BIRD with the blog, PeeDee. I&#039;m afraid this was a rather LONG MARCH for me during  my time OFF DUTY at lunchtime, so I ILLEGALLY looked at your blog for the answers and consoled myself with a glass of CHABLIS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for being an EARLY BIRD with the blog, PeeDee. I&#8217;m afraid this was a rather LONG MARCH for me during  my time OFF DUTY at lunchtime, so I ILLEGALLY looked at your blog for the answers and consoled myself with a glass of CHABLIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynette</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/24/financial-times-14143-by-cinephile/#comment-210867</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50572#comment-210867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not difficult? I beg to differ. Thanks for the blog, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not difficult? I beg to differ. Thanks for the blog, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/24/financial-times-14143-by-cinephile/#comment-210862</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50572#comment-210862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, PeeDee.

Very nicely done, indeed. I particularly liked 26ac [you&#039;ve accidentally left out TED] and 3,19 and 20dn.

RE 18dn: CHA = tea is an alternative spelling [used that way in today&#039;s Guardian Gordius puzzle] so the first &#039;less than&#039; is not strictly necessary, except for the surface.

I didn&#039;t think twice about COTE until I saw your query, thinking that it was a variation of &#039;cot&#039; and was surprised to see that it was in both Collins and Chambers only as an animal shelter. However, my SOED gives it as &#039;a cot or cottage, now dialect&#039;. [I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve seen houses called &#039;The Cote].]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, PeeDee.</p>
<p>Very nicely done, indeed. I particularly liked 26ac [you've accidentally left out TED] and 3,19 and 20dn.</p>
<p>RE 18dn: CHA = tea is an alternative spelling [used that way in today's Guardian Gordius puzzle] so the first &#8216;less than&#8217; is not strictly necessary, except for the surface.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think twice about COTE until I saw your query, thinking that it was a variation of &#8216;cot&#8217; and was surprised to see that it was in both Collins and Chambers only as an animal shelter. However, my SOED gives it as &#8216;a cot or cottage, now dialect&#8217;. [I'm sure I've seen houses called 'The Cote].]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
