<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,135 &#8211; Dante</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/25/financial-times-14135-dante/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/25/financial-times-14135-dante/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:53:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/25/financial-times-14135-dante/#comment-211626</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 01:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50420#comment-211626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bamberger,
I had the same as you (when I wrote the blog).
Then found out that &#039;obtain&#039; can mean &#039;be valid, applicable or true&#039; - for which the Chambers Thesaurus gives us &#039;exist&#039; as an alternative.
But don&#039;t ask me to give a sentence in which both are interchangeable - I&#039;m just a B#$%*&amp; foreigner anyway. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bamberger,<br />
I had the same as you (when I wrote the blog).<br />
Then found out that &#8216;obtain&#8217; can mean &#8216;be valid, applicable or true&#8217; &#8211; for which the Chambers Thesaurus gives us &#8216;exist&#8217; as an alternative.<br />
But don&#8217;t ask me to give a sentence in which both are interchangeable &#8211; I&#8217;m just a B#$%*&amp; foreigner anyway. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/25/financial-times-14135-dante/#comment-211508</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50420#comment-211508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t get 6d, 23a &amp; 25a.
I still don&#039;t get 6d . I can&#039;t think of a sentence where existent can be swapped for obtaining. I&#039;d be grateful for an example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t get 6d, 23a &amp; 25a.<br />
I still don&#8217;t get 6d . I can&#8217;t think of a sentence where existent can be swapped for obtaining. I&#8217;d be grateful for an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radler</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/25/financial-times-14135-dante/#comment-211282</link>
		<dc:creator>Radler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50420#comment-211282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For 8d
Angered, enraged and upset
...might have been quite nice, and you could have taken your pick as to the indicator and fodder.
It&#039;s unusual for an anagram clue to be ambiguous.  It&#039;s much easier with cryptic defs and double definitions, (and with reversals if the indicator&#039;s not positioned carefully).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 8d<br />
Angered, enraged and upset<br />
&#8230;might have been quite nice, and you could have taken your pick as to the indicator and fodder.<br />
It&#8217;s unusual for an anagram clue to be ambiguous.  It&#8217;s much easier with cryptic defs and double definitions, (and with reversals if the indicator&#8217;s not positioned carefully).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/25/financial-times-14135-dante/#comment-211193</link>
		<dc:creator>John Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50420#comment-211193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks for this, Sil.  Some people have criticised Dante at times for being too easy.  This one should satisfy them because it was pretty hard.  I couldn&#039;t get anywhere in the bottom right hand corner.  Probably because I put the more common English word RUBBER in 28 across instead of ERASER.  Also I couldn&#039;t get 3D perhaps for the reason you were unhappy with it and I had never heard of BLOATERS as a fish.  I wonder whether it is fair to mislead us with more than one possible answer to a clue or whether that is all part of the fun?  Cincinnus on Saturday had a clue which had two answers depending on whether you interpret &quot;HIT&quot; as being in the present tense of past tense. This held me up for quite a while.

With 29A, I don&#039;t think it is a double definition.  In fact I thought this a clever cryptic clue.  I took the definition to be &quot;out-of-this-world&quot;.   And space men is a reference to the fact that advertising agents sell space. i.e. in newspapers or on billboards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for this, Sil.  Some people have criticised Dante at times for being too easy.  This one should satisfy them because it was pretty hard.  I couldn&#8217;t get anywhere in the bottom right hand corner.  Probably because I put the more common English word RUBBER in 28 across instead of ERASER.  Also I couldn&#8217;t get 3D perhaps for the reason you were unhappy with it and I had never heard of BLOATERS as a fish.  I wonder whether it is fair to mislead us with more than one possible answer to a clue or whether that is all part of the fun?  Cincinnus on Saturday had a clue which had two answers depending on whether you interpret &#8220;HIT&#8221; as being in the present tense of past tense. This held me up for quite a while.</p>
<p>With 29A, I don&#8217;t think it is a double definition.  In fact I thought this a clever cryptic clue.  I took the definition to be &#8220;out-of-this-world&#8221;.   And space men is a reference to the fact that advertising agents sell space. i.e. in newspapers or on billboards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
