<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,149 by Loroso</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212575</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks PeeDee and Loroso. I found this difficult: it took several goes, finishing this morning, to get there - and I was still unsure about some of the parsing. Although I did enjoy it, I think &quot;TV show&quot; is such a broad theme that it makes for rather unhelpful definitions. Very ingenious, as usual, nonetheless - and of course I completely failed to spot the pangram!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks PeeDee and Loroso. I found this difficult: it took several goes, finishing this morning, to get there &#8211; and I was still unsure about some of the parsing. Although I did enjoy it, I think &#8220;TV show&#8221; is such a broad theme that it makes for rather unhelpful definitions. Very ingenious, as usual, nonetheless &#8211; and of course I completely failed to spot the pangram!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212495</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is the first Loroso I failed on completely.
In a way it has to do with the common definition (TV show). I have a TV, but do not use it for watching these kind of programmes, unfortunately. Some I knew (Laramie, Fame, Glee and the inimitable Blackadder (my all-time British comedy hero)) but Lost, or Equinox? Tenko?

While the clueing was good as ever, I fear I didn&#039;t like it that much today.
But I did like the non-thematic DRUMMER (21d). And FRIDGE-FREEZER. And a few more, including the ingenious thematic GLEE and 1ac.

Thanks, PeeDee, for the blog.
I think in 3d &#039;in gray&#039; should be seen as &#039;drably dressed for American&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is the first Loroso I failed on completely.<br />
In a way it has to do with the common definition (TV show). I have a TV, but do not use it for watching these kind of programmes, unfortunately. Some I knew (Laramie, Fame, Glee and the inimitable Blackadder (my all-time British comedy hero)) but Lost, or Equinox? Tenko?</p>
<p>While the clueing was good as ever, I fear I didn&#8217;t like it that much today.<br />
But I did like the non-thematic DRUMMER (21d). And FRIDGE-FREEZER. And a few more, including the ingenious thematic GLEE and 1ac.</p>
<p>Thanks, PeeDee, for the blog.<br />
I think in 3d &#8216;in gray&#8217; should be seen as &#8216;drably dressed for American&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212468</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more from me. In 14dn, I took tumbler = JILL to be a reference to the Nursery Rhyme &quot;and Jill came tumbling after&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more from me. In 14dn, I took tumbler = JILL to be a reference to the Nursery Rhyme &#8220;and Jill came tumbling after&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212418</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PeeDee@8 re 23dn: I was certainly thinking of that general sense of &quot;net&quot;. Going to &lt;i&gt;Chambers&lt;/i&gt; 2008, I can find &lt;b&gt;net²&lt;/b&gt; &quot;(of eg a result) final or conclusive&quot;, which I think fits well enough to &quot;overall&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PeeDee@8 re 23dn: I was certainly thinking of that general sense of &#8220;net&#8221;. Going to <i>Chambers</i> 2008, I can find <b>net²</b> &#8220;(of eg a result) final or conclusive&#8221;, which I think fits well enough to &#8220;overall&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212415</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pelham, I am not very happy about TANGO, TENKO sounds more likely.  Are you thinking of NET in the sense of &#039;net profit&#039;?  In that case wouldn&#039;t overall be GROSS rather than NET?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pelham, I am not very happy about TANGO, TENKO sounds more likely.  Are you thinking of NET in the sense of &#8216;net profit&#8217;?  In that case wouldn&#8217;t overall be GROSS rather than NET?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212410</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Loroso for the crossword and PeeDee for the blog. I gave up still needing 13ac and 7dn. Seeing the answers I should have got 13ac, but 7dn was to me an obscure word and not the type where an anagram helps.

I already had all the letters except V when the possibility of the pangram occurred to me with 12 clues still to solve - and I already knew there had to be a V in 1ac, I just had not worked it out fully at that stage, so the pangram did not help me on this occasion. Favourite clue 28ac.

17dn: I agree with the inclusion of &quot;as it were&quot; for the device of &quot;saves&quot; = &quot;two lots of save&quot; = BAR BAR.

23dn: I think this should be TENKO (OK net reversed).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Loroso for the crossword and PeeDee for the blog. I gave up still needing 13ac and 7dn. Seeing the answers I should have got 13ac, but 7dn was to me an obscure word and not the type where an anagram helps.</p>
<p>I already had all the letters except V when the possibility of the pangram occurred to me with 12 clues still to solve &#8211; and I already knew there had to be a V in 1ac, I just had not worked it out fully at that stage, so the pangram did not help me on this occasion. Favourite clue 28ac.</p>
<p>17dn: I agree with the inclusion of &#8220;as it were&#8221; for the device of &#8220;saves&#8221; = &#8220;two lots of save&#8221; = BAR BAR.</p>
<p>23dn: I think this should be TENKO (OK net reversed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212405</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Susan, an ingenious suggestion!  For it to work fully &#039;need&#039; would have to indicate &#039;going inside&#039; or &#039;surrounding&#039;, I can&#039;t see how this would fit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Susan, an ingenious suggestion!  For it to work fully &#8216;need&#8217; would have to indicate &#8216;going inside&#8217; or &#8216;surrounding&#8217;, I can&#8217;t see how this would fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynette</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212403</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great blog, PeeDee. Shame about the crossword! (I thought 22 was a good clue, though).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog, PeeDee. Shame about the crossword! (I thought 22 was a good clue, though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212402</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if an alternative explanation for Blackadder could be &quot;add&quot; (interrupt casually)surrounded by &quot;blacker&quot; (less pleasant). It&#039;s one of the only 2 tv-linked answers I got (the other was Laramie) and that&#039;s how I worked it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if an alternative explanation for Blackadder could be &#8220;add&#8221; (interrupt casually)surrounded by &#8220;blacker&#8221; (less pleasant). It&#8217;s one of the only 2 tv-linked answers I got (the other was Laramie) and that&#8217;s how I worked it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/10/31/financial-times-14149-by-loroso/#comment-212388</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=50837#comment-212388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks PeeDee

I&#039;ve never watched much TV so I felt totally ill equipped to tackle this.

Of course, I&#039;ve heard of Jimmy Savile - who hasn&#039;t? - so credit is due to Loroso for topicality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks PeeDee</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never watched much TV so I felt totally ill equipped to tackle this.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;ve heard of Jimmy Savile &#8211; who hasn&#8217;t? &#8211; so credit is due to Loroso for topicality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
