<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14154 Neo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213898</link>
		<dc:creator>rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Selene&#039; is more usual Dave, as in that film Underwordl.

Cheers
Rowly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Selene&#8217; is more usual Dave, as in that film Underwordl.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Rowly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213887</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dave@15. My take on this issue is that the reasonable expectation is that the vast majority of clues should be completely unambiguous but just occasionally there may be a clue which requires the checked letters to resolve an ambiguity. The average rate of these is probably a lot less than one per crossword, but I agree they can be irritating when you guess wrong. The reason I dislike &quot;Quick&quot; crosswords is that so many of the clues in them are ambiguous without cross-checking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave@15. My take on this issue is that the reasonable expectation is that the vast majority of clues should be completely unambiguous but just occasionally there may be a clue which requires the checked letters to resolve an ambiguity. The average rate of these is probably a lot less than one per crossword, but I agree they can be irritating when you guess wrong. The reason I dislike &#8220;Quick&#8221; crosswords is that so many of the clues in them are ambiguous without cross-checking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave H</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213871</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally a day behind so very rarely submit comment as usually all has been said.
Very enjoyable however I have a quibble regarding 12a, as this held me up for some time, there are 2 girls names hidden backwards in brisbanelesbians the other one being Selen which I wrote in first.This obviously made 6,7 and 8 down a bit tricky until I solved 8d and looked for another name in 12a.
I know Selen is a less used name than Elena but if you know your looking for a backward name when you have spotted one you tend to take that name as the answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally a day behind so very rarely submit comment as usually all has been said.<br />
Very enjoyable however I have a quibble regarding 12a, as this held me up for some time, there are 2 girls names hidden backwards in brisbanelesbians the other one being Selen which I wrote in first.This obviously made 6,7 and 8 down a bit tricky until I solved 8d and looked for another name in 12a.<br />
I know Selen is a less used name than Elena but if you know your looking for a backward name when you have spotted one you tend to take that name as the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213723</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now after all this, let&#039;s talk about &quot;Labour leader&quot; and &quot;Greek leader&quot;, Mr B ..... :)
When late last night I read the clues, I was hoping to .... well, ya know (others, perhaps, don&#039;t - therefore my apologies).
Now what about &quot;Abba finish&quot;? [I didn&#039;t comment &#039;there&#039; because I want to be honest and supportive (rightly so, in this case!) at the same time, which wasn&#039;t fully possible for me]

Fine puzzle which I solved while invigilating at work (invigilating? :)) so no dictionaries at hand apart from Vietnamese-English, Korean-English and Chinese-English (which is true).

While you think surfaces are &quot;non-existing&quot;, I thought yours were generally pretty good. You always care for them IMO.

In 23d, &quot;New filling for cheese&quot; I played with the idea of replacing the &#039;content&#039; of &quot;cheese&quot; with whatever: C ..... E
I&#039;ve put it in my Notebook of Crossword Ideas.

Many thanks to U2, scchua!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now after all this, let&#8217;s talk about &#8220;Labour leader&#8221; and &#8220;Greek leader&#8221;, Mr B &#8230;.. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
When late last night I read the clues, I was hoping to &#8230;. well, ya know (others, perhaps, don&#8217;t &#8211; therefore my apologies).<br />
Now what about &#8220;Abba finish&#8221;? [I didn't comment 'there' because I want to be honest and supportive (rightly so, in this case!) at the same time, which wasn't fully possible for me]</p>
<p>Fine puzzle which I solved while invigilating at work (invigilating? <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) so no dictionaries at hand apart from Vietnamese-English, Korean-English and Chinese-English (which is true).</p>
<p>While you think surfaces are &#8220;non-existing&#8221;, I thought yours were generally pretty good. You always care for them IMO.</p>
<p>In 23d, &#8220;New filling for cheese&#8221; I played with the idea of replacing the &#8216;content&#8217; of &#8220;cheese&#8221; with whatever: C &#8230;.. E<br />
I&#8217;ve put it in my Notebook of Crossword Ideas.</p>
<p>Many thanks to U2, scchua!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynette</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213720</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for taking the trouble to reply, Neo. On reflection, it is a matter of taste of course. 

Personally, I&#039;m not a fan of pushing the boundaries too far just for the sake of a good surface. 6dn was a very good surface but at the expense of clueing &#039;OON&#039; as &#039;round leg&#039;, and whilst I wouldn&#039;t claim that it was unfairly clued, I&#039;d have preferred something like &#039;Unusually large Cat came in breaking Clooney&#039;s heart!&#039;, but I&#039;m happy to accept that I&#039;m probably in the minority.

By the way, I really did enjoy solving the rest if this crossword, and was really quite surprised by the fact that 6dn seemed so out of character with the style of all the other clues.

Thanks again to both Neo &amp; scchua.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for taking the trouble to reply, Neo. On reflection, it is a matter of taste of course. </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m not a fan of pushing the boundaries too far just for the sake of a good surface. 6dn was a very good surface but at the expense of clueing &#8216;OON&#8217; as &#8217;round leg&#8217;, and whilst I wouldn&#8217;t claim that it was unfairly clued, I&#8217;d have preferred something like &#8216;Unusually large Cat came in breaking Clooney&#8217;s heart!&#8217;, but I&#8217;m happy to accept that I&#8217;m probably in the minority.</p>
<p>By the way, I really did enjoy solving the rest if this crossword, and was really quite surprised by the fact that 6dn seemed so out of character with the style of all the other clues.</p>
<p>Thanks again to both Neo &amp; scchua.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213701</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neo@11: I was quite happy with 6dn, although (as you say) it was not completely unambiguous. Partial or complete anagrams can work for obscure words, but there really should be only one plausible way of fitting in the missing letters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo@11: I was quite happy with 6dn, although (as you say) it was not completely unambiguous. Partial or complete anagrams can work for obscure words, but there really should be only one plausible way of fitting in the missing letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213686</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pelham - respect is mutual. 

Skinning cats is what I do, and as you know, with this activity different opportunities present themselves along the way. I too am a fan of strings of letters, of groups of words either treated as a single entity or as a multitude, or just about anything as long as it all agrees at the cryptic level. The surface is very important to me, but I always try to keep in mind that it really is an arbitrary construct - a means to an end only.

As to cats, I think you are telling me that I should not have clued an obscure word using a partial anagram, and I can accept that: there&#039;s no reason why a MAICE NOON shouldn&#039;t be the solution, especially as I might have made the same crit myself of someone else&#039;s work.

Cheers from one PB to another.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pelham &#8211; respect is mutual. </p>
<p>Skinning cats is what I do, and as you know, with this activity different opportunities present themselves along the way. I too am a fan of strings of letters, of groups of words either treated as a single entity or as a multitude, or just about anything as long as it all agrees at the cryptic level. The surface is very important to me, but I always try to keep in mind that it really is an arbitrary construct &#8211; a means to an end only.</p>
<p>As to cats, I think you are telling me that I should not have clued an obscure word using a partial anagram, and I can accept that: there&#8217;s no reason why a MAICE NOON shouldn&#8217;t be the solution, especially as I might have made the same crit myself of someone else&#8217;s work.</p>
<p>Cheers from one PB to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213668</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Neo for popping in. It is always interesting to discuss clues with you, because you clearly respect precision of language.

12ac: I can accept that &quot;two word phrase&quot; is not quite right. If you take the subject of &quot;hold&quot; as &quot;some letters&quot; then the plural verb is indeed justified. I was thinking of it as a sequence of letters, in which case the verb needs to be singular. The advantage of putting &quot;will hold&quot; (or similar) is that it is acceptable as either singular or plural. In this case, there is a distinct disadvantage as the extra word would take the clue on to a second line.

24dn: I am happy to stand corrected on this one. The phrase &lt;b&gt;spear carrier&lt;/b&gt; indeed appears in &lt;i&gt;Chambers&lt;/i&gt; 2011 with the definition &quot;an actor in a minor non-speaking role&quot;, so no indication of definition by example is required. It just did not occur to me that this was worth checking before I wrote my comment - it should have done. I am sure the phrase can be found hyphenated in some other dictionary, but to me that really does not matter.

Finally (for now anyway) a bit more about 6dn. To me this was an obscure answer, and I appreciated the very precise clue. The real answer was much more plausible than the only sensible alternative MAICE NOON given the checking letters. This was a case where a partial anagram was appropriate for precision, which is not always the case. It was also valuable to me that none of these checking letters was necessary to solve any of the relevant across clues. Sometimes two obscure answers cross. It is then desirable that at least one can be solved without the mutually checking letter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Neo for popping in. It is always interesting to discuss clues with you, because you clearly respect precision of language.</p>
<p>12ac: I can accept that &#8220;two word phrase&#8221; is not quite right. If you take the subject of &#8220;hold&#8221; as &#8220;some letters&#8221; then the plural verb is indeed justified. I was thinking of it as a sequence of letters, in which case the verb needs to be singular. The advantage of putting &#8220;will hold&#8221; (or similar) is that it is acceptable as either singular or plural. In this case, there is a distinct disadvantage as the extra word would take the clue on to a second line.</p>
<p>24dn: I am happy to stand corrected on this one. The phrase <b>spear carrier</b> indeed appears in <i>Chambers</i> 2011 with the definition &#8220;an actor in a minor non-speaking role&#8221;, so no indication of definition by example is required. It just did not occur to me that this was worth checking before I wrote my comment &#8211; it should have done. I am sure the phrase can be found hyphenated in some other dictionary, but to me that really does not matter.</p>
<p>Finally (for now anyway) a bit more about 6dn. To me this was an obscure answer, and I appreciated the very precise clue. The real answer was much more plausible than the only sensible alternative MAICE NOON given the checking letters. This was a case where a partial anagram was appropriate for precision, which is not always the case. It was also valuable to me that none of these checking letters was necessary to solve any of the relevant across clues. Sometimes two obscure answers cross. It is then desirable that at least one can be solved without the mutually checking letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213657</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello. 

Thanks to scchua, and thanks indeed for the comments, some of which centred around the issue of cryptic grammar. If you&#039;ll allow me, I&#039;ll say what I had in mind from that perspective when I wrote the clues you&#039;ve scrutinized.

5ac: this cryptic construction wasn&#039;t designed to advertise any particular sequence of events, but to describe an entity NARMENIA that &#039;wants&#039; (does not have) a first letter. 

12ac: to me surfaces are not real. There are no lesbians in this crossword clue, nor a two-word phrase. OTOH some letters, b, r, i, s, b, a, n, e, l, e, s, b, i, a, n, s, with an arbitrarily assigned gap somewhere between them, hold (because they attract a plural usage) back (seen in a backward direction) the required word. AFAIA all cryptic tenses agree.
 
15ac: TA=appreciated was my intention.
 
18ac: &#039;supposedly&#039; in Collins, but not in Chambers. I went the simplest available way.
 
6dn: you can&#039;t please all the people etc, but I quite liked this one! As to poorly-clued (which probably does need a hyphen), I&#039;d like to know why Lynette thinks this is the case (impossible to respond without more information). I can&#039;t see any grammatical boo-boos. 

18dn: as someone mentioned, PHEASANT is singular or plural. If you do what the clue asks, &#039;cut H from PHEASANT&#039; you get the required word – no last letters to remove!
 
24dn: &#039;spear-carrier&#039; was according to Chambers a synonym when I set the puzzle. They may have had second thoughts.

Happy hunting,
Neo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. </p>
<p>Thanks to scchua, and thanks indeed for the comments, some of which centred around the issue of cryptic grammar. If you&#8217;ll allow me, I&#8217;ll say what I had in mind from that perspective when I wrote the clues you&#8217;ve scrutinized.</p>
<p>5ac: this cryptic construction wasn&#8217;t designed to advertise any particular sequence of events, but to describe an entity NARMENIA that &#8216;wants&#8217; (does not have) a first letter. </p>
<p>12ac: to me surfaces are not real. There are no lesbians in this crossword clue, nor a two-word phrase. OTOH some letters, b, r, i, s, b, a, n, e, l, e, s, b, i, a, n, s, with an arbitrarily assigned gap somewhere between them, hold (because they attract a plural usage) back (seen in a backward direction) the required word. AFAIA all cryptic tenses agree.</p>
<p>15ac: TA=appreciated was my intention.</p>
<p>18ac: &#8216;supposedly&#8217; in Collins, but not in Chambers. I went the simplest available way.</p>
<p>6dn: you can&#8217;t please all the people etc, but I quite liked this one! As to poorly-clued (which probably does need a hyphen), I&#8217;d like to know why Lynette thinks this is the case (impossible to respond without more information). I can&#8217;t see any grammatical boo-boos. </p>
<p>18dn: as someone mentioned, PHEASANT is singular or plural. If you do what the clue asks, &#8216;cut H from PHEASANT&#8217; you get the required word – no last letters to remove!</p>
<p>24dn: &#8216;spear-carrier&#8217; was according to Chambers a synonym when I set the puzzle. They may have had second thoughts.</p>
<p>Happy hunting,<br />
Neo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/financial-times-14154-neo/#comment-213595</link>
		<dc:creator>rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51061#comment-213595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think people say &#039;appreciated&#039; without bothering with the &#039;much&#039; these days. Same as &#039;ta&#039; I guess.

On with The G!

Rowly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people say &#8216;appreciated&#8217; without bothering with the &#8216;much&#8217; these days. Same as &#8216;ta&#8217; I guess.</p>
<p>On with The G!</p>
<p>Rowly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
