<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,786 &#8211; Gordius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-214062</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-214062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;With anger&quot; or &quot;irate&quot; could equally be used to describe her humour before she killed him.
(posted with humour)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With anger&#8221; or &#8220;irate&#8221; could equally be used to describe her humour before she killed him.<br />
(posted with humour)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikewglospur</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-214003</link>
		<dc:creator>mikewglospur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-214003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just read through all the comments above. Surprised no-one has queried/criticised 12A.
How can &quot;irate&quot; be defined as &quot;anger&quot;?
If it&#039;s supposed to be = &quot;with anger&quot;, please provide me with an example of a sentence where this could be substituted for the word &quot;irate&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read through all the comments above. Surprised no-one has queried/criticised 12A.<br />
How can &#8220;irate&#8221; be defined as &#8220;anger&#8221;?<br />
If it&#8217;s supposed to be = &#8220;with anger&#8221;, please provide me with an example of a sentence where this could be substituted for the word &#8220;irate&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213911</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds a bit smelly, Andrew.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a bit smelly, Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213907</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought Jones as an indication for DOW was totally unsound.  It only works if you think that Dow was the first name of Mr Jones.

In general I was very disappointed with this crossword, it was a lot easier and a lot sloppier than Gordius&#039; usual products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Jones as an indication for DOW was totally unsound.  It only works if you think that Dow was the first name of Mr Jones.</p>
<p>In general I was very disappointed with this crossword, it was a lot easier and a lot sloppier than Gordius&#8217; usual products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brucew_aus</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213788</link>
		<dc:creator>brucew_aus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gordius and UY
Cup Day took preference and congrats to the Irish who bred the first seven horses to finish!  Only really focused on this today and thought that this was one of his best puzzles - certainly did not find it easy.

Knew about the things called Rawlplugs but did not know their name.  Parsed GRAMPUS slightly differently by finding a puffer was the name for a small porpoise and tenuously linked that to a dolphin like grampus.

Didn&#039;t go down the presidential ROMNEY path but still took some time to settle on WETLAND.

All in all a good work out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gordius and UY<br />
Cup Day took preference and congrats to the Irish who bred the first seven horses to finish!  Only really focused on this today and thought that this was one of his best puzzles &#8211; certainly did not find it easy.</p>
<p>Knew about the things called Rawlplugs but did not know their name.  Parsed GRAMPUS slightly differently by finding a puffer was the name for a small porpoise and tenuously linked that to a dolphin like grampus.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t go down the presidential ROMNEY path but still took some time to settle on WETLAND.</p>
<p>All in all a good work out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chas</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213717</link>
		<dc:creator>chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William @22 thanks for that. I now agree that Gordius was perfectly correct where I had initially thought to condemn him for an error.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William @22 thanks for that. I now agree that Gordius was perfectly correct where I had initially thought to condemn him for an error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213716</link>
		<dc:creator>g larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I whizzed through this and was surprised not to find more comments like NeilW&#039;s &#039;Tuesday is the new Monday&#039;. Much easier than Rufus yesterday. I can&#039;t recall ever finding a puzzle easier than RCW apparently did - a red-letter day indeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I whizzed through this and was surprised not to find more comments like NeilW&#8217;s &#8216;Tuesday is the new Monday&#8217;. Much easier than Rufus yesterday. I can&#8217;t recall ever finding a puzzle easier than RCW apparently did &#8211; a red-letter day indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213713</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a very fair expression of your opinion,Derek.
Of course,I do not confuse easy with poor; if it doesn&#039;t puzzle me (easy) then it&#039;s a failure as a puzzle. Very straightforward.

BTW I have always found the left more satisfying than the right!
So I agree with your last sentence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very fair expression of your opinion,Derek.<br />
Of course,I do not confuse easy with poor; if it doesn&#8217;t puzzle me (easy) then it&#8217;s a failure as a puzzle. Very straightforward.</p>
<p>BTW I have always found the left more satisfying than the right!<br />
So I agree with your last sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213694</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RCW it&#039;s because with the easy ones you continue confuse easy with poor, which are only equivalent some of the time. Your comments re hard are spotted, rest assured, and when one day you call a real stinker &quot;good&quot; just becasue it is hard, no doubt some one will comment. It won&#039;t be me because I will have given up and found something else to do.

Interesting that you went RHS (write in) followed by LHS (harder). I went LHS (mostly write in) followed by RHS (harder).

Thank heaven for differences, life would be so dull otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RCW it&#8217;s because with the easy ones you continue confuse easy with poor, which are only equivalent some of the time. Your comments re hard are spotted, rest assured, and when one day you call a real stinker &#8220;good&#8221; just becasue it is hard, no doubt some one will comment. It won&#8217;t be me because I will have given up and found something else to do.</p>
<p>Interesting that you went RHS (write in) followed by LHS (harder). I went LHS (mostly write in) followed by RHS (harder).</p>
<p>Thank heaven for differences, life would be so dull otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/06/guardian-25786-gordius/#comment-213680</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51052#comment-213680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Galeraman @26
Don&#039;t be surprised!
I reckon that I praise as many for being a good challenge as I do criticise for being a write-in.
Somehow people seem to spot (and object to) the latter and ignore the former. Ah well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galeraman @26<br />
Don&#8217;t be surprised!<br />
I reckon that I praise as many for being a good challenge as I do criticise for being a write-in.<br />
Somehow people seem to spot (and object to) the latter and ignore the former. Ah well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
