<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Azed 2110</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/18/azed-2110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/18/azed-2110/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/18/azed-2110/#comment-215544</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51359#comment-215544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks all
I thought this was more enjoyable than an average Azed.
The definition in 10ac was so specific for &#039;quotahopper&#039; that I did not check the cryptic! I cannot see any way round it now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all<br />
I thought this was more enjoyable than an average Azed.<br />
The definition in 10ac was so specific for &#8216;quotahopper&#8217; that I did not check the cryptic! I cannot see any way round it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/18/azed-2110/#comment-215536</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51359#comment-215536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guess at the time was that 10ac. was at one stage going to be QUEUE-HOPPER, and the clue somehow didn&#039;t quite catch up with the change. But there isn&#039;t a word queue-hopper in Chambers, so that theory doesn&#039;t seem to work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess at the time was that 10ac. was at one stage going to be QUEUE-HOPPER, and the clue somehow didn&#8217;t quite catch up with the change. But there isn&#8217;t a word queue-hopper in Chambers, so that theory doesn&#8217;t seem to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/11/18/azed-2110/#comment-215522</link>
		<dc:creator>sidey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=51359#comment-215522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10 across, I vote clanger. Or more charitably, a work in progress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 across, I vote clanger. Or more charitably, a work in progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
