<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic 682 / Hectence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/10/guardian-quiptic-682-hectence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/10/guardian-quiptic-682-hectence/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/10/guardian-quiptic-682-hectence/#comment-217130</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=52453#comment-217130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes quite. Ta both.

Umm, I know it&#039;s standard xword practice, but I&#039;ve always been a bit unsure about rejecting = reversing. I can see that &quot;a rejection&quot; can be &quot;a reverse&quot;, I&#039;m just not convinced about extending that to rejecting/reversing. I suspect the target audience may well appreciate having it spelt out too. So could one of you rich people who can afford a proper dictionary care to do that please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes quite. Ta both.</p>
<p>Umm, I know it&#8217;s standard xword practice, but I&#8217;ve always been a bit unsure about rejecting = reversing. I can see that &#8220;a rejection&#8221; can be &#8220;a reverse&#8221;, I&#8217;m just not convinced about extending that to rejecting/reversing. I suspect the target audience may well appreciate having it spelt out too. So could one of you rich people who can afford a proper dictionary care to do that please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
