<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyman No. 3454 (16th December)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/#comment-219132</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=52850#comment-219132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did not think 10 across was ambiguous, and indeed put it in before having any of the cross letters.  To me it was clear:  Sensitive (= sore)
over --- reversed, and the surface was a London landmark (statue of
Eric in Pickaninny Surplus :-) ).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not think 10 across was ambiguous, and indeed put it in before having any of the cross letters.  To me it was clear:  Sensitive (= sore)<br />
over &#8212; reversed, and the surface was a London landmark (statue of<br />
Eric in Pickaninny Surplus <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/#comment-217781</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=52850#comment-217781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I struggled to parse SUBEDITOR, having convinced myself that SUB was the word part from BOTTOM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggled to parse SUBEDITOR, having convinced myself that SUB was the word part from BOTTOM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/#comment-217764</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=52850#comment-217764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got stuck in Tyneside. If you&#039;d given me an even money bet as to whether opah was a fish or not, I&#039;d have said no. 
Also failed on 7d where &quot;pan&quot; = crticise was a step too far for me and 14a where I thought i was looking for something meaning outcome such as result.

Thanks for blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got stuck in Tyneside. If you&#8217;d given me an even money bet as to whether opah was a fish or not, I&#8217;d have said no.<br />
Also failed on 7d where &#8220;pan&#8221; = crticise was a step too far for me and 14a where I thought i was looking for something meaning outcome such as result.</p>
<p>Thanks for blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/#comment-217763</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=52850#comment-217763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smooth as ever.

Thanks Lorraine and for all the efforts in 2012. Happy Festive Season!

I guess 10 could be read either way, but I interpreted the surface to give EROS, so no problem there.

I didn&#039;t know NAVE=wheel hub and had to look up OPAH (Winfrey?. ;) )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smooth as ever.</p>
<p>Thanks Lorraine and for all the efforts in 2012. Happy Festive Season!</p>
<p>I guess 10 could be read either way, but I interpreted the surface to give EROS, so no problem there.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know NAVE=wheel hub and had to look up OPAH (Winfrey?. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/#comment-217762</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=52850#comment-217762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Lorraine,

Another good puzzle from Everyman which I didn&#039;t start till Wednesday due to its absence from the Guardian website
on the Sunday. I particularly liked EXPATRIATE, RELY, CHIEFTAIN and CHESSPIECE. Thanks Everyman for all the puzzles
throughout the year and thanks Lorraine etal for the blogging. All the best. Merry Crimbo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lorraine,</p>
<p>Another good puzzle from Everyman which I didn&#8217;t start till Wednesday due to its absence from the Guardian website<br />
on the Sunday. I particularly liked EXPATRIATE, RELY, CHIEFTAIN and CHESSPIECE. Thanks Everyman for all the puzzles<br />
throughout the year and thanks Lorraine etal for the blogging. All the best. Merry Crimbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2012/12/23/everyman-no-3454-16th-december/#comment-217761</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 08:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=52850#comment-217761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks, Lorraine (and for all your blogs during 2012).

Persuaded myself that the Surrey town was HASELMERE, which didn&#039;t help matters, but after that was corrected, all clearly clued as usual.  Just had to check out our fishy friend at 6ac.

I agree with you about EROS/SORE being ambiguous - it&#039;s one of my pet niggles.  Other folk will say that that&#039;s what crossing letters are for, but for me, the stand alone clue could be read two ways.  Small point in, as always, a pleasing Sunday puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks, Lorraine (and for all your blogs during 2012).</p>
<p>Persuaded myself that the Surrey town was HASELMERE, which didn&#8217;t help matters, but after that was corrected, all clearly clued as usual.  Just had to check out our fishy friend at 6ac.</p>
<p>I agree with you about EROS/SORE being ambiguous &#8211; it&#8217;s one of my pet niggles.  Other folk will say that that&#8217;s what crossing letters are for, but for me, the stand alone clue could be read two ways.  Small point in, as always, a pleasing Sunday puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
