<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 8,181 / Nestor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:01:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertandjoyce</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218215</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertandjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A difficult puzzle today. Sorry, yesterday - we&#039;ve only just finished it!

We wondered whether &#039;backing&#039; in 23d referred to Ringo&#039;s role (as opposed to drum-roll). 

Thanks RR and Nestor fir keeping us awake with a good and enjoyable challenge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A difficult puzzle today. Sorry, yesterday &#8211; we&#8217;ve only just finished it!</p>
<p>We wondered whether &#8216;backing&#8217; in 23d referred to Ringo&#8217;s role (as opposed to drum-roll). </p>
<p>Thanks RR and Nestor fir keeping us awake with a good and enjoyable challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RatkojaRiku</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218201</link>
		<dc:creator>RatkojaRiku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks to allan_c for spotting the typo - there is one almost every week, despite my efforts to proof-read my blogs before posting them.

And to Raich for the parsing of 23. The bit about the word &quot;ring&quot; and the picture (of a ring) &quot;o&quot; seems obvious now that it has been explained to me. I think that I was expecting a more technical term for papal regalia, although I suppose the wording was chosen mainly to reinforce the papal reference initiated by John Paul I. I did, however, expect a reversal (&quot;backed&quot;), although I suppose this could be understood to be back to back, one after the other. If this is the case, it is not a device that I recall having seen used very often ....

I will supplement the blog accordingly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks to allan_c for spotting the typo &#8211; there is one almost every week, despite my efforts to proof-read my blogs before posting them.</p>
<p>And to Raich for the parsing of 23. The bit about the word &#8220;ring&#8221; and the picture (of a ring) &#8220;o&#8221; seems obvious now that it has been explained to me. I think that I was expecting a more technical term for papal regalia, although I suppose the wording was chosen mainly to reinforce the papal reference initiated by John Paul I. I did, however, expect a reversal (&#8220;backed&#8221;), although I suppose this could be understood to be back to back, one after the other. If this is the case, it is not a device that I recall having seen used very often &#8230;.</p>
<p>I will supplement the blog accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218199</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this was hard but fair, and I was very pleased to finish it without resorting to aids. Ringo was my last in after the penny finally dropped on &quot;John Paul I&quot;.
Andy B.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was hard but fair, and I was very pleased to finish it without resorting to aids. Ringo was my last in after the penny finally dropped on &#8220;John Paul I&#8221;.<br />
Andy B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan_c</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218195</link>
		<dc:creator>allan_c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops, what happened there?  What I intended was S(omebody) should read S(omebod)Y but the angled brackets seem to have fouled it up.  So replace &#039;(&#039; and &#039;)&#039; with angled brackets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, what happened there?  What I intended was S(omebody) should read S(omebod)Y but the angled brackets seem to have fouled it up.  So replace &#8216;(&#8216; and &#8216;)&#8217; with angled brackets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan_c</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218194</link>
		<dc:creator>allan_c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just noticed a small typo at 17ac: S should be SY - but hardly worth bothering about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed a small typo at 17ac: S should be SY &#8211; but hardly worth bothering about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218193</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another one who struggled with this one.  Couldn&#039;t get there in the end but enjoyed the bits I did manage.  STAR TURN was priceless ...

Thanks to S&amp;B.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one who struggled with this one.  Couldn&#8217;t get there in the end but enjoyed the bits I did manage.  STAR TURN was priceless &#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks to S&amp;B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan_c</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218191</link>
		<dc:creator>allan_c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, a tough one today - we&#039;ve been spoiled by three fairly easy ones so far this week.  Needed assistance to finish it, and the blog to understand some of the parsing.

One quibble re 12ac - MANITOBA is a province of Canada, not a territory.  For the difference see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_and_territories_of_Canada

Thanks, RR - and Nestor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, a tough one today &#8211; we&#8217;ve been spoiled by three fairly easy ones so far this week.  Needed assistance to finish it, and the blog to understand some of the parsing.</p>
<p>One quibble re 12ac &#8211; MANITOBA is a province of Canada, not a territory.  For the difference see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_and_territories_of_Canada" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_and_territories_of_Canada</a></p>
<p>Thanks, RR &#8211; and Nestor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218190</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks RR and N. I do agree this was a tough one! Raich&#039;s explanation of 23d seems good; I also struggled with parsing 24a, although the answer seemed obvious enough. Good stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RR and N. I do agree this was a tough one! Raich&#8217;s explanation of 23d seems good; I also struggled with parsing 24a, although the answer seemed obvious enough. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raich</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/03/independent-8181-nestor/#comment-218170</link>
		<dc:creator>Raich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53611#comment-218170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think 23D is ring in two forms RING O.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 23D is ring in two forms RING O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
