<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times no.14,207 by Gurney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fearsome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/#comment-218625</link>
		<dc:creator>fearsome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53961#comment-218625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks Gurney and Ringo
Enter defeated me and I hadn&#039;t parsed Forester completely]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks Gurney and Ringo<br />
Enter defeated me and I hadn&#8217;t parsed Forester completely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gurney</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/#comment-218588</link>
		<dc:creator>Gurney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53961#comment-218588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks for the blog, Ringo, and to those who commented.  Yes, I can confirm that a homophone of &#039;male&#039; was what was intended but, if two experienced solvers independently arrived at the answer the other way, it probably works just fine!   Liam is the Irish version of William and I must admit I&#039;d not have used it as not being familiar enough.    Re LOOTS (also a homophone issue!), I approach homophones with great caution as the same words are pronounced so differently in different places.    So I&#039;d looked in Collins which gives exactly the same pronunciation for both words and I took it from there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for the blog, Ringo, and to those who commented.  Yes, I can confirm that a homophone of &#8216;male&#8217; was what was intended but, if two experienced solvers independently arrived at the answer the other way, it probably works just fine!   Liam is the Irish version of William and I must admit I&#8217;d not have used it as not being familiar enough.    Re LOOTS (also a homophone issue!), I approach homophones with great caution as the same words are pronounced so differently in different places.    So I&#8217;d looked in Collins which gives exactly the same pronunciation for both words and I took it from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/#comment-218573</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53961#comment-218573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Gurney and Ringo.

I was interested in your comment about the vowel sound in the word &#039;LUTE&#039;, Eileen. 
Here, north of Hadrian&#039;s Wall, I think I&#039;m right in saying that the word is normally pronounced so as to rhyme with the word &#039;BOOT&#039;. So local dialect must play a part. 
The pronunciation must also depend on other factors though; a diphthong would be difficult to insert in, say, RUDE, but unavoidable in, say, JUTE.

There&#039;s an interesting article about the letter U here:  http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/6411/when-and-why-did-the-letter-u-begin-being-called-ju   
Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gurney and Ringo.</p>
<p>I was interested in your comment about the vowel sound in the word &#8216;LUTE&#8217;, Eileen.<br />
Here, north of Hadrian&#8217;s Wall, I think I&#8217;m right in saying that the word is normally pronounced so as to rhyme with the word &#8216;BOOT&#8217;. So local dialect must play a part.<br />
The pronunciation must also depend on other factors though; a diphthong would be difficult to insert in, say, RUDE, but unavoidable in, say, JUTE.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an interesting article about the letter U here:  <a href="http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/6411/when-and-why-did-the-letter-u-begin-being-called-ju" rel="nofollow">http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/6411/when-and-why-did-the-letter-u-begin-being-called-ju</a><br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/#comment-218559</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53961#comment-218559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Ringo. 

I, too, went for Liam, without thinking - Gurney is Irish! - but, Wanderer&#039;s right, &#039;picked up&#039; usually indicates a homophone.

Talking of which, I had to question LOOTS / lutes [which I would pronounce as &#039;lewts&#039;] but was amazed to see that Chambers gives &#039;loot&#039; as the first of the  alternative pronunciations - so, apologies, Gurney, and many thanks for a quick but very enjoyable solve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ringo. </p>
<p>I, too, went for Liam, without thinking &#8211; Gurney is Irish! &#8211; but, Wanderer&#8217;s right, &#8216;picked up&#8217; usually indicates a homophone.</p>
<p>Talking of which, I had to question LOOTS / lutes [which I would pronounce as 'lewts'] but was amazed to see that Chambers gives &#8216;loot&#8217; as the first of the  alternative pronunciations &#8211; so, apologies, Gurney, and many thanks for a quick but very enjoyable solve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ringo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/#comment-218557</link>
		<dc:creator>Ringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53961#comment-218557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Wanderer: Yes, that&#039;s much more straightforward - I&#039;d imagine your version is what the setter had in mind. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Wanderer: Yes, that&#8217;s much more straightforward &#8211; I&#8217;d imagine your version is what the setter had in mind. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/10/financial-times-no-14207-by-gurney/#comment-218556</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=53961#comment-218556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gurney and Ringo.

In 26d, MAIL, I read &#039;man picked up&#039; as &#039;sounds like male&#039;, although your &#039;man&#039;s name reversed&#039; works just as well.

I agree that this was not the hardest, but a very enjoyable solve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gurney and Ringo.</p>
<p>In 26d, MAIL, I read &#8216;man picked up&#8217; as &#8216;sounds like male&#8217;, although your &#8216;man&#8217;s name reversed&#8217; works just as well.</p>
<p>I agree that this was not the hardest, but a very enjoyable solve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
