<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,212 by IO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/#comment-218946</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54180#comment-218946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a mathematician I had the same concerns as you mike, but then on second thoughts came to the same conclusion as Pelham.  I had written some comemnts in the original blog to that effect, but then for some completely numpty reason I acidentally deleted it and ha to write another more rushed attempt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a mathematician I had the same concerns as you mike, but then on second thoughts came to the same conclusion as Pelham.  I had written some comemnts in the original blog to that effect, but then for some completely numpty reason I acidentally deleted it and ha to write another more rushed attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/#comment-218945</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54180#comment-218945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Pelham.

I should&#039;ve considered &#039;non-zero&#039; in the sense of &#039;not equal to zero&#039;. 
With hindsight, of course, it&#039;s rather obvious!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Pelham.</p>
<p>I should&#8217;ve considered &#8216;non-zero&#8217; in the sense of &#8216;not equal to zero&#8217;.<br />
With hindsight, of course, it&#8217;s rather obvious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/#comment-218937</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54180#comment-218937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mike04@4 re 13ac: The first definition of &lt;b&gt;real&lt;/b&gt; in &lt;i&gt;Chambers&lt;/i&gt; 2011 is &quot;actually existing&quot;. Try a sentence like &quot;there is a real effect&quot;: you could replace &quot;real&quot; by &quot;non-zero&quot; in that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mike04@4 re 13ac: The first definition of <b>real</b> in <i>Chambers</i> 2011 is &#8220;actually existing&#8221;. Try a sentence like &#8220;there is a real effect&#8221;: you could replace &#8220;real&#8221; by &#8220;non-zero&#8221; in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/#comment-218936</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54180#comment-218936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much, Io and PeeDee.

In 13ac, I&#039;m wondering about the definition &#039;Real&#039; and the solution &#039;NON-ZERO&#039;. 
In mathematics, zero is a real number:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much, Io and PeeDee.</p>
<p>In 13ac, I&#8217;m wondering about the definition &#8216;Real&#8217; and the solution &#8216;NON-ZERO&#8217;.<br />
In mathematics, zero is a real number:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_number</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crypticsue</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/#comment-218922</link>
		<dc:creator>crypticsue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54180#comment-218922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having had an enforced week off from crosswords/reading anything at all, I did wonder how I was going to cope with an IO on my first day back but I didn&#039;t have any problems at all and enjoyed myself into the bargain.  Always a fan of a crossword where my favourite miserable donkey makes an appearance.

Thanks to IO for entertaining me greatly while  proving that my brain still works and to PeeDee for the blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had an enforced week off from crosswords/reading anything at all, I did wonder how I was going to cope with an IO on my first day back but I didn&#8217;t have any problems at all and enjoyed myself into the bargain.  Always a fan of a crossword where my favourite miserable donkey makes an appearance.</p>
<p>Thanks to IO for entertaining me greatly while  proving that my brain still works and to PeeDee for the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/#comment-218921</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54180#comment-218921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Io for an enjoyable crossword and PeeDee for the blog. Favourite clue 22ac and I needed PeeDee&#039;s explanation for 23ac and 10dn.

7ac: I agree with PeeDee&#039;s explanation (I agree with all of the others as well, but he expressed doubt about this one).

13ac: My one grumble with this crossword. Nero was a real person, but the story of him fiddling while Rome burnt is almost certainly untrue: at best he will have played a plucked stringed instrument such as a lyre. To me, that means we need some indication of the dubious nature of the definition.

5dn: When solving, I wondered if &quot;on&quot; was doing double duty here, but &lt;i&gt;Chambers&lt;/i&gt; 2008 gives &lt;b&gt;pointe&lt;/b&gt; as &quot;the extreme tip of the toe, or the position of standing on it&quot;, so &quot;tiptoe&quot; is a sufficient definition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Io for an enjoyable crossword and PeeDee for the blog. Favourite clue 22ac and I needed PeeDee&#8217;s explanation for 23ac and 10dn.</p>
<p>7ac: I agree with PeeDee&#8217;s explanation (I agree with all of the others as well, but he expressed doubt about this one).</p>
<p>13ac: My one grumble with this crossword. Nero was a real person, but the story of him fiddling while Rome burnt is almost certainly untrue: at best he will have played a plucked stringed instrument such as a lyre. To me, that means we need some indication of the dubious nature of the definition.</p>
<p>5dn: When solving, I wondered if &#8220;on&#8221; was doing double duty here, but <i>Chambers</i> 2008 gives <b>pointe</b> as &#8220;the extreme tip of the toe, or the position of standing on it&#8221;, so &#8220;tiptoe&#8221; is a sufficient definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowland</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/16/financial-times-14212-by-io/#comment-218918</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54180#comment-218918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is O getting the &#039;no&#039;. So you are right! But it could have been ALL OURS anyway, so not the best trick. I thought some here didn&#039;t make a lor of sense, but still an enjoyable run-out.

Thanks,
Rowly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is O getting the &#8216;no&#8217;. So you are right! But it could have been ALL OURS anyway, so not the best trick. I thought some here didn&#8217;t make a lor of sense, but still an enjoyable run-out.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Rowly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
