<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,209 by Mudd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:54:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/#comment-219560</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54449#comment-219560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, good point.  Thank you, Wil.  When it is a single letter I think it hardly makes a difference but nevertheless I do like to be accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good point.  Thank you, Wil.  When it is a single letter I think it hardly makes a difference but nevertheless I do like to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/#comment-219557</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54449#comment-219557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strictly speaking, Pete, 6dn is I in the anagram. But not a big deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strictly speaking, Pete, 6dn is I in the anagram. But not a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/#comment-219448</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54449#comment-219448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took a long time to get 6d!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a long time to get 6d!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/#comment-219447</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54449#comment-219447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failed on 6d, 9d &amp; 21a. They don&#039;t look too hard now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failed on 6d, 9d &amp; 21a. They don&#8217;t look too hard now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/#comment-219408</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54449#comment-219408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi John, As I remarked, I think that the BARKING MAD clue is a weak one in general but I do not see a problem with the definition per se.  I was unsure about the CLARET definition but have just now looked up the word in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary and found that it is given as a slang term for &#039;blood&#039; from the 17th century.  So, technically it may be passable but, if that is the only justification, then I have to agree that the combination of its being slang and that archaic makes it more obscure than I like to see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, As I remarked, I think that the BARKING MAD clue is a weak one in general but I do not see a problem with the definition per se.  I was unsure about the CLARET definition but have just now looked up the word in the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary and found that it is given as a slang term for &#8216;blood&#8217; from the 17th century.  So, technically it may be passable but, if that is the only justification, then I have to agree that the combination of its being slang and that archaic makes it more obscure than I like to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/24/financial-times-14209-by-mudd/#comment-219399</link>
		<dc:creator>John Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54449#comment-219399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Pete. 
An enjoyable puzzle.  But I thought the definitions for three clues were a bit suspect.  Crossbar you have mentioned.  Barking MAD and CLARET.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pete.<br />
An enjoyable puzzle.  But I thought the definitions for three clues were a bit suspect.  Crossbar you have mentioned.  Barking MAD and CLARET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
