<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enigmatic Variations No. 1052: Mixed Doubles II by Kruger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/26/enigmatic-variations-no-1052-mixed-doubles-ii-by-kruger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/26/enigmatic-variations-no-1052-mixed-doubles-ii-by-kruger/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kruger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/26/enigmatic-variations-no-1052-mixed-doubles-ii-by-kruger/#comment-219572</link>
		<dc:creator>Kruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54523#comment-219572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pleased you got there in the end, mc_rapper, and thanks for the blog. The original Mixed Doubles was EV302 back in 1998 so version 3 is scheduled for about 2028.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pleased you got there in the end, mc_rapper, and thanks for the blog. The original Mixed Doubles was EV302 back in 1998 so version 3 is scheduled for about 2028.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/01/26/enigmatic-variations-no-1052-mixed-doubles-ii-by-kruger/#comment-219545</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=54523#comment-219545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, mc. I never thought of MAIM as a noun and hence injury. Some indication that it was an archaic use in the clue would have saved me some time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, mc. I never thought of MAIM as a noun and hence injury. Some indication that it was an archaic use in the clue would have saved me some time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
