<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 14,230 by Cinephile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:28:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keeper</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220816</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps I&#039;m being picky, but doesn&#039;t 16a need something to refer to Austria&#039;s historical status as an archduchy?  For example, &quot;Austria once, say,...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m being picky, but doesn&#8217;t 16a need something to refer to Austria&#8217;s historical status as an archduchy?  For example, &#8220;Austria once, say,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelG</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220207</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyable puzzle
It should be HI TECH in your parsing of 1 across.
Keep up the good work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyable puzzle<br />
It should be HI TECH in your parsing of 1 across.<br />
Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220193</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@mike04/PeeDee @4&amp;5
Yes - I think that&#039;s definitely how I parsed it at the time, except I thought of it as &quot;for&quot; Yorkshiremen meaning that&#039;s what what they would think one was saying when one said &quot;war drum&quot;. I suppose it does work, I was just rather excited at finding the other approach which seemed to account for the plural a bit better - but rather too elaborately, it seems to me now; the simpler parsing is normally the intended one. I don&#039;t think there can be any serious doubt that it&#039;s basically about the Yorkshire pronunciation of &quot;War drum&quot; as &quot;Ward room&quot; with the &quot;for&quot; carried over by the &quot;and&quot;. It obviously works, it&#039;s just hard to describe and one can get a bit lost in the syntax.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike04/PeeDee @4&amp;5<br />
Yes &#8211; I think that&#8217;s definitely how I parsed it at the time, except I thought of it as &#8220;for&#8221; Yorkshiremen meaning that&#8217;s what what they would think one was saying when one said &#8220;war drum&#8221;. I suppose it does work, I was just rather excited at finding the other approach which seemed to account for the plural a bit better &#8211; but rather too elaborately, it seems to me now; the simpler parsing is normally the intended one. I don&#8217;t think there can be any serious doubt that it&#8217;s basically about the Yorkshire pronunciation of &#8220;War drum&#8221; as &#8220;Ward room&#8221; with the &#8220;for&#8221; carried over by the &#8220;and&#8221;. It obviously works, it&#8217;s just hard to describe and one can get a bit lost in the syntax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220191</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Mike04, I meant Italian not Latin, fixed the blog now.  (un)Fortunately I don&#039;t know any Latin so I was not distracted by the spelling.

Re 19dn I was initally put off the homophone explanation by it being &#039;and Yorkshiremen&#039; not &#039;for Yorkshiremen&#039;, but added to the multiple rooms explanation proposed by Thomas99 and refined by mike04 I think gives quite a plausible explanation.

I have never known Cinephile come back and explain clues here or anywhere else, so I guess we will never know for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mike04, I meant Italian not Latin, fixed the blog now.  (un)Fortunately I don&#8217;t know any Latin so I was not distracted by the spelling.</p>
<p>Re 19dn I was initally put off the homophone explanation by it being &#8216;and Yorkshiremen&#8217; not &#8216;for Yorkshiremen&#8217;, but added to the multiple rooms explanation proposed by Thomas99 and refined by mike04 I think gives quite a plausible explanation.</p>
<p>I have never known Cinephile come back and explain clues here or anywhere else, so I guess we will never know for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220189</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PeeDee

Thanks for parsing 3dn. I couldn&#039;t see it because the Latin for three is TRES.
However TRE is used in modern Rome - in Italian.

I find it very difficult to get my head round 19dn. Here&#039;s my attempt:
   The first room is for naval officers: a WARD ROOM.
   The second room is heard when a Yorkshireman pronounces WAR DRUM.
It&#039;s a Cinephile clue: don&#039;t enter either of these rooms, just enter the definition at the end - helpfully accompanied by a question mark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PeeDee</p>
<p>Thanks for parsing 3dn. I couldn&#8217;t see it because the Latin for three is TRES.<br />
However TRE is used in modern Rome &#8211; in Italian.</p>
<p>I find it very difficult to get my head round 19dn. Here&#8217;s my attempt:<br />
   The first room is for naval officers: a WARD ROOM.<br />
   The second room is heard when a Yorkshireman pronounces WAR DRUM.<br />
It&#8217;s a Cinephile clue: don&#8217;t enter either of these rooms, just enter the definition at the end &#8211; helpfully accompanied by a question mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220188</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelham Barton@2/PeeDee

Agree with Pelham B about the Yorkshire homophone. PeeDee&#039;s other comment about the plural made me think about it and I think the explanation is that &quot;Ward Room&quot; means, amongst other things, Naval Officers - not the room they use but the people themselves (&quot;the officers of a warship collectively, excepting the captain&quot; - Collins). But I think it&#039;s &quot;rooms&quot; because it&#039;s &quot;ward&quot; (a kind of room) plus &quot;room&quot;. So that bit of the clue is effectively a cryptic clue for &quot;Ward Room&quot;. The rest tells us that this is said &quot;for...Yorkshiremen&quot;, i.e. the solution is said like &quot;ward room&quot; if the speaker is from Yorkshire. I did it in a bit of a hurry and didn&#039;t really notice but it&#039;s actually a satisfyingly intricate clue, with the main laugh coming from the unusual &quot;precision&quot; of the homophone bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelham Barton@2/PeeDee</p>
<p>Agree with Pelham B about the Yorkshire homophone. PeeDee&#8217;s other comment about the plural made me think about it and I think the explanation is that &#8220;Ward Room&#8221; means, amongst other things, Naval Officers &#8211; not the room they use but the people themselves (&#8220;the officers of a warship collectively, excepting the captain&#8221; &#8211; Collins). But I think it&#8217;s &#8220;rooms&#8221; because it&#8217;s &#8220;ward&#8221; (a kind of room) plus &#8220;room&#8221;. So that bit of the clue is effectively a cryptic clue for &#8220;Ward Room&#8221;. The rest tells us that this is said &#8220;for&#8230;Yorkshiremen&#8221;, i.e. the solution is said like &#8220;ward room&#8221; if the speaker is from Yorkshire. I did it in a bit of a hurry and didn&#8217;t really notice but it&#8217;s actually a satisfyingly intricate clue, with the main laugh coming from the unusual &#8220;precision&#8221; of the homophone bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220186</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi PeeDee

19dn: May I suggest that WAR DRUM only sounds like WARD ROOM if you speak in a northern English accent, as for example in Yorkshire?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi PeeDee</p>
<p>19dn: May I suggest that WAR DRUM only sounds like WARD ROOM if you speak in a northern English accent, as for example in Yorkshire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2013/02/06/financial-times-14230-by-cinephile/#comment-220159</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fifteensquared.net/?p=55299#comment-220159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, PeeDee.

For those who missed it, Araucaria was on &#039;Newsnight&#039; last night - you can see it here here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21347467] and produced a special puzzle for the programme: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mk25/features/crossword]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, PeeDee.</p>
<p>For those who missed it, Araucaria was on &#8216;Newsnight&#8217; last night &#8211; you can see it here here: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21347467" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21347467</a> and produced a special puzzle for the programme: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mk25/features/crossword" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006mk25/features/crossword</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
