Posted by duncanshiell on 26th June 2013
Archive for the 'Inquisitor' Category
Posted by duncanshiell on 19th June 2013
This is Chalicea’s fourth puzzle to appear in the Inquisitor series.
Posted by HolyGhost on 12th June 2013
Anyone who thought that Schadenfreude might be getting tired – think again!
I find it impossible to paraphrase the preamble, so here it is in full:
“One letter must be changed in the definition part of eight clues. The new letter must be removed from the answer before it is entered in the grid in titular fashion. Each of these grid entries is a jumbled example of a 10dn 1ac. The initial letters of the unjumbled examples can be arranged to form another example (X), for which (disregarding 19) the title cryptically provides temporal confirmation. An instruction relating to X which will enable grid completion is spelt out by single letters to be removed from the other 34 clues, never leaving a non-word.”
Quite a lot going on here!
Posted by kenmac on 5th June 2013
Preamble: 36 clues each contain one word which must have a letter removed, and those remaining rearranged to form a new word before solving. Discarded letters from the across clues spell out how a confused individual (who may be seen wandering in the grid and should be highlighted) might describe himself; those from the down clues a comment he might make about the answers to the five remaining clues and their relationship to five titles. Solvers must write the relevant item from another title (bearing in mind that of the puzzle) underneath the grid.
Posted by Hihoba on 29th May 2013
Wordplay in each of several clues yields a single extra letter which (omitting one keyword) spell out a phrase that was an integral part of 5 Down. The influence of this unclued entry has affected eight answers but, taking the phrase into account, another entry (which might otherwise be considered thematic) has been unaffected and must be highlighted.
Posted by duncanshiell on 22nd May 2013
The preamble for Y Z by Samuel was not too long. It stated "Six clues contain partial wordplay only; the remainder of the wordplay could be given by a two-word phrase Y Z. In 30 further clues, the wordplay leads to the answer plus an extra letter not to entered into the grid; these give Y Z #1. Y Z #2 makes up the unclued part of the perimeter; its unchecked letters could give PIP LIKES ICECAP. Four entries clued without definition may be combined to give Y Z #3 and must be highlighted.
Posted by HolyGhost on 15th May 2013
In 21 clues, a word in the definition was cut short, and wrongly corrected with a different ending. The first letters of each original correct string reveal a quotation that points to 10 unclued entries. We have to highlight “the appropriately numbered grid entry”.
A novel device to generate the letters in the quotation, which would seem to make matters more difficult …
Posted by kenmac on 8th May 2013
Preamble: Clues are arranged in alphabetical order of answers. Cells numbered 1 to 13 spell out a security question. 13 similarly arranged cells (including four shared clashing cells) will reveal the mistranscribed response. Solvers must consider the original response when choosing the more appropriate of two possible sets of instructions. Charybdis recommends following these instructions for real. A resulting line drawing will help solvers, who must finally decide how to shade these 22 cells using two colours, and hence resolve the four clashes.
Posted by Hihoba on 1st May 2013
Twelve across and thirteen down clues have a single letter misprinted in their definitions, the correct letters being different in each case. A description of the “missing” letter, symmetrically disposed, must be highlighted in the completed grid.
Posted by duncanshiell on 24th April 2013
This week’s Inquisitor has a new setter – Wickball. Welcome Sir [or Madam]
Posted by HolyGhost on 17th April 2013
Eleven corrections to definitions spell a phrase explaining 10 unclued entries. The remaining unclued entry (defining the phrase) would “in normal cryptic crossword usage, regard Lato’s interpretation as erroneous.”
Don’t really understand that last bit, but let’s crack on.
Posted by kenmac on 10th April 2013
Preamble: The wordplay in each clue leads to the answer plus an extra letter. These letters, in clue order, suggest how solvers should draw six straight lines, including two for guidance, and highlight 30 cells in the completed grid.
So, not much to do regarding the grid fill though I found identifying some of the extra letters a bit tricky.
Posted by Hihoba on 3rd April 2013
An artistic and musical offering this week from Kruger.
Posted by duncanshiell on 27th March 2013
Nutmeg is a fairly regular contributor to the Inquisitor series and always makes the solver think
Posted by HolyGhost on 20th March 2013
A first time out for Anax in the Inquisitor series.
Twelve answers, each clued without a definition, are of a kind. Their characters fall into two groups (as indicated in their clues); the members of the two groups are similar, but “?” is missing from the second group. We need to identify “?”; the (definitionless) 4d might be helpful.