Posted by Simon Harris on May 12th, 2013
I think we welcome another new setter to the IoS this week, though I do recall one or two Inquisitors set by eXternal quite recently.
Posted in Independent | 8 Comments »
Posted by The Trafites on May 12th, 2013
Nick: This was perhaps the toughest ‘plain’ puzzle from Azed (other than the ‘specials’) that I have attempted – a definite 10/10 on the hardness scale.
Posted in Azed | 11 Comments »
Posted by The Trafites on May 12th, 2013
Posted in Everyman | 6 Comments »
Posted by mc_rapper67 on May 11th, 2013
I think I have solved all the clues correctly, but I can’t quite explain the parsing/wordplay in all cases. And although I could detect an underlying theme-ette, there were a couple of ‘almost-nina’s that, again, I couldn’t quite justify. So maybe you could say I have failed this particular ‘Rorschach test’ – I hope it won’t be a blot on my copybook!
Posted in Independent | 18 Comments »
Posted by PeeDee on May 10th, 2013
I used to find Tramp puzzles pretty tricky but I think I must be getting on to his wavelength at last. I have not seen any of the Star Wars movies but fortunately for me it was not necessary to know anything about them to get to the solutions. Thank you Tramp.
Posted in Guardian | 20 Comments »
Posted by Admin on May 10th, 2013
The annual lunch for Times setters is taking place on 23rd May and this will be followed by a Sloggers and Betters get-together in The Town of Ramsgate (62 Wapping High Street E1) from 4pm onwards. All welcome.
Posted in Announcements | 8 Comments »
Posted by Andrew on May 10th, 2013
Gordius is appearing at strange intervals these days – he used to be fairly predictably every other week, but then we saw him on a Friday and the following Tuesday, and now today as well as last Tuesday. Regular readers will know I am not his greatest fan: I found this a little harder than some of his recent puzzles, though with no major hold-ups, and with the usual smattering of niggles.
Posted in Guardian | 36 Comments »
Posted by duncanshiell on May 10th, 2013
Posted in Independent | 18 Comments »
Posted by John on May 9th, 2013
A rather difficult but enjoyable and so far as I can see utterly sound crossword from Tees (except perhaps for 1dn, about which I shall no doubt be corrected). He has achieved a rather odd feat, which I shall mention in a moment; the other feat which he almost achieved (if indeed he was even trying to achieve it) was to have no anagrams in the crossword. This failed and he had to use them in two clues, but only two I think.
Posted in Independent | 12 Comments »
Posted by Ringo on May 9th, 2013
I always enjoy Redshank’s puzzles, although my enjoyment in this instance was tempered by the fact that, having dashed through the NW corner, I spent half an hour staring at the rest of the grid in a stupor of dumb incomprehension. I’m still stumped by 19dn.
Posted in FT | 7 Comments »
Posted by manehi on May 9th, 2013
Fun and challenging, despite the two longer clues falling almost immediately. Favourites were 15a and 3d.
Posted in Guardian | 26 Comments »
Posted by Sil van den Hoek on May 9th, 2013
Monday Prize Crossword/Apr 29
Yes, half of the clues were double or cryptic definitions, but this was once more an enjoyable offering from Dante. That said, I am always a bit annoyed when seeing clues that I saw before (6d, 22d).
Posted in FT | 11 Comments »
Posted by Pete Maclean on May 9th, 2013
Posted in FT | 10 Comments »
Posted by PeeDee on May 8th, 2013
I found this much more amenable than the previous Io I blogged which was a desperate struggle – so getting to the end of this puzzle unaided came as something of a relief. Still not easy though, thank you Io. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 15 Comments »
